La muerte de Artemio Cruz

... Show More
El paso del tiempo —más de treinta años— ha ratificado el valor literario de una novela: La muerte de Artemio Cruz, en la que el autor se situaba a la vanguardia de lo que algunos años más tarde se conocería como la «nueva novela hispanoamericana».

Carlos Fuentes sorprendió a los críticos con una novela moderna y de enorme solidez narrativa. Novela de gran intensidad temática, está centrada en la reflexión sobre el México surgido de la Revolución, pero también analiza, con amargura, cuestiones tan universales y permanentes como la soledad, el poder o el desamor. La mente del protagonista transita durante toda la obra por la memoria y se convierte en un símbolo de salvación, es el espejo en el que el hombre se reconoce, el lugar de encuentro con su pasado que es, a la vez, su futuro.

207 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1962

Places
mexico

About the author

... Show More
Carlos Fuentes Macías was a Mexican writer and one of the best-known novelists and essayists of the 20th century in the Spanish-speaking world. Fuentes influenced contemporary Latin American literature, and his works have been widely translated into English and other languages.

Fuentes was born in Panama City, Panama; his parents were Mexican. Due to his father being a diplomat, during his childhood he lived in Montevideo, Rio de Janeiro, Washington, Santiago, and Buenos Aires. In his adolescence, he returned to Mexico, where he lived until 1965. He was married to film star Rita Macedo from 1959 till 1973, although he was an habitual philanderer and allegedly, his affairs - which he claimed include film actresses such as Jeanne Moreau and Jean Seberg - brought her to despair. The couple ended their relationship amid scandal when Fuentes eloped with a very pregnant and then-unknown journalist named Silvia Lemus. They were eventually married.

Following in the footsteps of his parents, he also became a diplomat in 1965 and served in London, Paris (as ambassador), and other capitals. In 1978 he resigned as ambassador to France in protest over the appointment of Gustavo Diaz Ordaz, former president of Mexico, as ambassador to Spain. He also taught courses at Brown, Princeton, Harvard, Penn, George Mason, Columbia and Cambridge.

---
کارلوس فوئنتس در ۱۱ نوامبر ۱۹۲۸ در پاناماسیتی به دنیا آمد. مادرش برتا ماسیاس ریواس و پدرش رافائل فوئنتس بوئه‌تیگر است. پدر وی از دیپلمات‌های مشهور مکزیک است. وی سفیر مکزیک در هلند، پاناما، پرتغال و ایتالیا بود.

دوران کودکی‌اش در واشنتگتن دی.سی. و سانتیاگوی شیلی گذشت. فوئنتس در دانشگاه مکزیک و ژنو در رشتهٔ حقوق تحصیل کرد. او به زبان‌های انگلیسی و فرانسه تسلط کامل دارد.

آثار
* مرگ آرتمیوکروز، ۱۹۶۲
* آئورا، ۱۹۶۲
* زمین ما،‌ ۱۹۷۵
* گرینگوی پیر، ۱۹۸۵
* ملکهٔ عروسک‌ها
* آسوده خاصر، ترجمهٔ محمدامین لاهیجی.
* مرگ آرتمیو کروز، ترجمهٔ مهدی سحابی.
* آئورا، ترجمهٔ عبدالله کوثری.
* سرهیدا.
* خودم با دیگران (به تازگی با نام از چشم فوئنتس) ترجمهٔ عبدالله کوثری.


---
Carlos Fuentes Macías fue un escritor mexicano y uno de los novelistas y ensayistas más conocidos en el mundo de habla española. Fuentes influyó en la literatura contemporánea de América Latina, y sus obras han sido ampliamente traducidas al inglés y otros idiomas.

Fuentes nació en la ciudad de Panamá, Panamá, sus padres eran mexicanos. Debido a su padre era un diplomático, durante su infancia vivió en Montevideo, Río de Janeiro, Washington, Santiago y Buenos Aires. En su adolescencia regresó a México, donde vivió hasta 1965. Estuvo casado con la estrella de cine Rita Macedo de 1959 hasta 1973, aunque era un mujeriego habitual y, al parecer, sus asuntos - que se ha cobrado incluyen actrices como Jeanne Moreau y Jean Seberg, su llevados a la desesperación. La pareja terminó su relación en medio del escándalo, cuando Fuentes se fugó con un periodista muy embarazada y entonces desconocido de nombre Silvia Lemus. Se casaron finalmente.

Siguiendo los pasos de sus padres, también se convirtió en un diplomático en 1965 y sirvió en Londres, París (como embajador), y otras capitales. En 1978 renunció al cargo de embajador en Francia en protesta por el nombramiento de Gustavo Díaz Ordaz, ex presidente de México, como embajador en España.

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
34(34%)
4 stars
35(35%)
3 stars
30(30%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More

An opening scene that blows your mind: the impressions of the old Mexican tycoon Artemio Cruz, on his deathbed. What follows are a dozen cycles of texts, presented in three different perspectives. In the 1st person, we hear the raving Artemio on his deathbed, sharing his disjointed thoughts and memories. In the 2nd person, there is a kind of living conscience that confronts Artemio with his faults and mistakes, making him face the consequences of his actions. And in the 3rd person, there are flashbacks on crucial episodes from his life, painting a vivid picture of his rise to power.


The construction of the story initially is intriguing, as it keeps the reader guessing and wondering what will happen next. However, soon it gets boring, as the same patterns and perspectives are repeated over and over again. The information that is presented gives you very gradually a picture of a reckless man who, through cunning, blackmail and manipulation, has built up an empire against the background of the turbulent Mexican history in the first half of the twentieth century.


Regularly there are beautiful passages, especially the stories in the 3rd person, which are rich in detail and atmosphere. You also get a somewhat disconcerting picture of a big man with his doubts and bumbling, which makes him more human and relatable. But there are too many dark, confused fragments to speak of an enjoyable reading. It's a pity that the author didn't manage to bring all these elements together in a more cohesive and engaging way.

July 15,2025
... Show More

I had to read a book for my high school World Literature class. I specifically chose this one as it appeared interesting. Little did I know what to anticipate from it as it truly caught me off guard.

The book commences with a surprise due to its explicitness. The author, Carlos Fuentes, employs rich imagery and other techniques to captivate the reader and maintain their focus, making them eager to read on. Although the novel isn't straightforward, it helps expand your imagination and makes you think about what's happening.

Set during the Mexican revolution, the main character witnesses the rise of modern Mexico and is a part of it all. The novel is about a wealthy high-class man, Artemio Cruz, who is on his deathbed. At his last moment, there is a crowd around him, many of whom, as he sees it, never loved him but only his wealth. He orders his only loyal friend, Padilla, to bring a recorder to capture his final spoken words.

Then, we learn about his life through his memories of climbing from poverty to wealth, which involve corruption, guilt, disloyalty, and affairs. He speaks of his experiences in a crucial and disturbing war, where all emotions seem to be erased from existence. There, he meets the woman he loved and desired to spend the rest of his life with, but is devastated to find her dead. Through memories, he slips in and out of dreaming and reliving, back to the reality of his deathbed.

The book seems to follow a sequence of events, starting from his recent memory and going back to his first memory, all the way to his birth, where the novel concludes.

July 15,2025
... Show More
The Great Mexican Novel? The Great Novel of the Latin American "Boom" Generation? However you describe La muerte de Artemio Cruz's greatness, you'll need a capital G.


This book, which is widely regarded as Carlos Fuentes's finest work - I'll refrain from endorsing that claim for now, as I haven't read any of his other fictional pieces, but I recognize it would be extremely difficult to surpass - tells the dark and convoluted story of the failure of the Mexican Revolution through the equally dark and convoluted character of Artemio Cruz. A Mexican Charles Foster Kane, a real-life Ebenezer Scrooge - Artemio Cruz is definitely not a likable man. He betrays his lovers, comrades, and country for his own personal gain. He treats his family as mere financial dependents, incapable even of the hard work and disciplined thought he demands from his servants and business partners. He hosts New Year's Eve parties simply to invite less wealthy people into his home and be worshipped.


Fuentes arranges the book into sections that do not present the story chronologically but do repeat the same three-part structure: (1) An important moment in Cruz's life is narrated by an omniscient voice, with occasional interjections from other characters. (2) On his deathbed, and in the first person, Cruz reflects on the events in his life, justifies his treachery, and expresses his contempt for the "well-wishers" gathered at his bedside. And (3) the voice of Fuentes - or is it the voice of the Revolution? - directly addresses Cruz, drawing a connection between Cruz's abandonment of ideals and his country's overall corrupt state. Of course, this third section, written in the second person, reads like the author's direct reproach not only of Artemio Cruz but of us, the audience, as well.


Another reviewer has stated that Cruz may be the least likable character in Latin American literature. Yes, but is he truly that different from any of the rest of us? Fuentes, with reference to Baudelaire, says no. Selfish, scornful, and unworthy of any love and redemption - Artemio Cruz is our twin / our brother.
July 15,2025
... Show More
There are pros and cons to my annual self-imposed requirement of reading a book in Spanish.

On the one hand, there are several advantages. Firstly, I feel extremely cultured and smart when I engage in this activity. It gives me a sense of accomplishment and makes me feel more connected to different languages and cultures. Secondly, by the second half of the book, my Spanish is back to near-fluent levels. This continuous practice helps me maintain and improve my language skills.

On the other hand, there are also some drawbacks. For one thing, I basically have no idea what happened in the first half of the book. The unfamiliar language and complex content can make it difficult to understand the story initially. Additionally, it takes an incredibly long time to read a book in a foreign language. This can be quite time-consuming and may require a significant amount of patience and dedication.

Based on what I actually understood, this is a really good novel about Mexico and an old man named Artemio. However, the shifting perspectives, Mexican idioms, and extensive historical and political context might make this an overly ambitious choice for a non-native speaker like me.
July 15,2025
... Show More

Fuentes masterfully sums up the complex Mexican reality within the monumental "Chingar" Chapter. It is truly a remarkable piece of work. If you have the ability to read in Spanish, it is highly recommended that you read this book in its original language. This is because when you read about certain words like "F*#K" for a dozen pages or so in translation, something significant is lost. The original language likely conveys a more profound and nuanced meaning. This thought-provoking book should not be overlooked. It should be studied in conjunction with the Mexican Revolution and Post-Revolutionary Mexico to gain an adequate historical context. By doing so, one can better understand the true essence and significance of the events and ideas presented in the book.

July 15,2025
... Show More

A serving of Citizen Kane is taken. It is then stirred well with the Latin American literary boom, Mexican politics, and the Mexican Revolution. James Joyce is added as a seasoning along with a dash of the post Han Dynasty Three Kingdoms epic. The outcome is The Death of Artemio Cruz.


This is not a book that can be casually perused while lounging on a chaise by the pool. However, for those who are willing to engage deeply with literature, it offers a remarkable experience. The protagonist, Cruz, is on his deathbed. The novel alternates between flashbacks that reveal snippets of his life and his deathbed perceptions of himself and those around him, presented in a more or less stream of consciousness style.


In the hands of a less skilled author, this approach might have resulted in a jumbled mess. But Fuentes is a master. He presents us not with a linear story but a character portrait. We gradually move from a vague understanding (in a sense, we have a rough sketch of the whole person early on) to a more focused one (as our initial impressions of Cruz are continuously developed, refined, and challenged). In a nutshell, Cruz is a revolutionary fighter who survives and achieves great success afterward, but often acts in morally ambiguous ways. However, this brief summary fails to convey the full experience that the reader has as Cruz takes shape in the novel.

July 15,2025
... Show More
The Death of Artemio Cruz (1962) stands as an exquisitely intricate and baroque narrative.

The protagonist, Artemio Cruz, is a complex composite figure. He begins as a revolutionary fighter but gradually transforms into an opportunist and plutocrat. His type mirrors many real Mexican historical figures. Just like many revolutionary generals, he exploits his privileged position to build lavish mansions for himself, imitating the Porfirian aristocrats he overthrew and betraying the ideals of the Revolution.

The novel presents a significant challenge due to its multiple and constantly evolving points of view on the protagonist. Cruz's life is not presented in a chronological sequence from birth to death but as a series of fragmented moments that shift rapidly in time. Fuentes adopts a triadic perspective, using first, second, and third-person accounts of Cruz's life. The second-person account, which some reviewers found rather confusing, seems to be a self-evaluating and self-condemning voice of conscience. These three perspectives not only represent Cruz's multiplicity of selves but also his inability to reconcile his ruthless, self-serving ego with his self-negating conscience, his opportunism with his idealism.

La Muerte de Artemio Cruz is an incredibly expansive novel, a work of excess and supreme confidence that demands diligent effort from its readers. At the very least, one needs to have some knowledge of Mexican history. However, if you do your homework, it proves to be a highly rewarding read.
July 15,2025
... Show More

The first time I attempted to read this novel at the age of 18 or 19, I abandoned it. In my thirties, I managed to finish it. It seemed fascinating to me to observe how it weaves the fictional life of a successful and corrupt entrepreneur who emerged from the ranks of the soldiery and rose to become an official of the Mexican Revolution with contemporary Mexican history. However, I also thought it was long, its language was overly ornate and its form was rather contrived.


It would take about thirty years and a new reading of the novel to raise it from three to five stars and understand that this novel, first published in 1962 and part of the dazzling boom of the Latin American novel in the sixties, is a classic that improves with age and rereadings.


The frame narrative is the protracted death of the septuagenarian protagonist, oscillating between his memories and the crudeness of his agony, the awareness of his vile, aging and rotten body, and the almost cheerful carelessness and energetic and vital egoism with which he embraces his growing moral rottenness resulting from excessive, comfortable and increasingly cynical enrichment, in a journey that goes from love to lovelessness and contempt.


The frame narrative recalls and at the same time deeply contrasts with those of La muerte de Ivan Ilich (1886) by Leo Tolstoy, As I lay dying (Mientras agonizo, 1930) by William Faulkner and El rumor de la montaña (1954) by Yasunari Kawabata, all of which, like Fuentes, work in a highly personal and original way on the relationship between aging, memory, history, morality, conscience and the confrontation with one's own death.


I still haven't found it easy to start reading Fuentes' novel. The shocking and uncompromising crudeness of Artemio Cruz's agony from the first paragraph of the novel, the overwhelming preciosism, more churrigueresque than baroque, of the language and narrative inventiveness, perhaps only comparable to the sonorous ocean of Alejo Carpentier with whom he also shares the sense of the marvellous real where the sea smells of guava and melons, make the initial slope of the novel steep. It is true that one gets tired of so much sordid piling up of descriptions of decomposing entrails, but it is no less true that the life narrative gains speed, complexity, energy and contextual richness and ends up becoming an irresistible and implacable wave that bursts and unfolds in a splendid confusion of birth and death, of the protagonist and of the Mexican Revolution.

Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.