Les jeux sont faits. Texte et documents.

This is a really excellent book!

I really like the concept of death as it is described in this book. It is understandable and exciting.

Definitely worth reading!

The way the author presents the idea of death makes it not only a topic of serious consideration but also a source of great interest.

The story unfolds in a way that keeps the reader engaged from start to finish.

Whether you are a fan of thought-provoking literature or just looking for an interesting read, this book is sure to satisfy.

It offers a unique perspective on death that is both profound and accessible.

So, if you haven't already, I highly recommend picking up this book and giving it a try.

You won't be disappointed!

"Existentialism from Dasein to Dasein" by Jean-Paul Sartre is about a woman named "Eve" and a man named "Pierre" who die separately and meet in the afterlife. Eve's husband, Andra, when Eve is on her deathbed, drops a few drops of poison into her water glass so that after Eve's death, he can marry her sister, Lust, and in this way, take all the wealth of this wealthy family for himself. Pierre is the leader of a revolutionary organization against the king. He has been working on a revolutionary operation for three years, and just one day before the operation, he is killed by a person named Lucien. Eve and Pierre meet in the afterlife and are attracted to each other. This attraction causes a greater sadness in both of them to replace all their previous sorrows: "If only they had met each other before death." Therefore, they are allowed to return to the world, and if they can be happy together for 24 hours and still be sure that they love each other until the end of the day, they will be given a new chance at life.

This story explores themes of love, betrayal, and the meaning of life and death. It shows how even in the afterlife, people can still experience emotions and desires. The idea of being given a second chance at life based on the condition of being happy together for a short period of time adds an element of drama and suspense to the story.

Overall, "Existentialism from Dasein to Dasein" is a thought-provoking and engaging work that challenges readers to think about their own lives and the choices they make.

Getting a book can make you read it quickly! While I was reading this book, I was also engaged in reading Sartre's existentialism book (I am). And this led me to read this story with a different intellectual space. The book, through imagination and a journey to the world of gnomes, has many messages about human choices and options. I recommend reading it to those who are interested in Sartre's philosophy.

Moreover, this book offers a unique perspective on life and decision-making. It makes you think deeply about the consequences of our choices and how they shape our existence. The vivid descriptions of the gnome world add an element of magic and wonder, making the reading experience even more enjoyable.

Whether you are a philosophy enthusiast or simply looking for an interesting and thought-provoking read, this book is definitely worth checking out. It will expand your mind and give you a new way of looking at the world around you.

I finished this book while lying in bed. My original plan was to finish it and then go to sleep. I thought it would be a quick read, a nice book about existentialism and absurdism, and then I could doze off. However, I couldn't. The book really hit me hard and I couldn't stop thinking about what I had just read.

It is written in a unique way, in the form of a play. This is quite nice as the structure and the locations of the characters are immediately clear, and it's interesting to read something different from a normal novel. Moreover, it's a relatively short read at only around 150 pages, so don't let that deter you.

What I didn't expect, and what kept me awake, was that this book is not what I thought Sartre would write about. When I think of Sartre, I think of existentialism, absurdism, and the idea that man is condemned to be free. But this book was the complete opposite.

This book is all about romantic love. The concept that people are destined to be soulmates, that love is instant, and that perfect love prevails above all is the central plot. The two main characters are made for each other and only for each other. This is the first thing I disagreed with and didn't expect.

Secondly, this book is about determinism. The two main characters didn't find each other in life. In death, they get a chance to come alive again together, as long as their love can last 24 hours in the real world. Of course, it doesn't happen. It doesn't matter what you try, the result is predetermined. Despite his best efforts, Pierre doesn't succeed in his earthly goals either. This is the second thing I disagreed with and also didn't expect.

So here we have the two opposites of what Sartre is known for. Existentialism, absurdism, the burden of choice, existence before essence, looking for meaning in the meaningless versus determinism, the romantic ideal, and having your fate written down. How do we reconcile these?

The struggle of Pierre and Eva shows this. It seems like they, especially Pierre, have no choice and must do what they need to do for the sake of the revolution. He can't abandon his comrades. The same goes for Eva and her sister. What are the true reasons they took the chance to return to earth? Was it really for themselves, or did they just want to believe that while in reality they had to finish their unfinished business on earth - even though it's clearly a choice? That was the test: they might seem bound by circumstances to fail, and the reader sees this "excuse", and it eventually does fail, but the real reason for failure in the end was just their freely chosen actions hidden behind the "bad faith" of their circumstances. Let's not forget that the reason Pierre dies in the first place and then again the second time is because he chose to be an asshole to Lucien. This was the unexpected yet avoidable result of his freely chosen actions.

It must be that they didn't really want to be together in the end, no matter what the old woman in heaven/hell said about "belonging together" or "made for each other". Perhaps that was the lie, and the main characters prove their freedom of choice by focusing on other things in the real world that they care more about (Pierre his revolution, Eva her sister) - and thus failing their test. Could it be that the title - "les jeux sont faits, the dice is cast" - refers not to their fate being what it is, but to the two characters being made for each other? And so not ending up together even though they are explicitly given the chance is an example of the will of individual humans who choose to focus on what they want and thus don't have to end up as they "should"?

And then, of course, there is the section of the little girl where they choose to help someone else. Which in the end is the only reason to live anyway.

It is exactly what one can expect from Sartre... A philosophical novel that starts very well... It finds a very good continuation and also ends very well... In this narrative, it can be clearly felt that philosophy prevails over the novel and from a certain point on, the heaviness of Sartre's existentialist shadow can be felt in the writings... Of course, when you read Sartre, you should never forget that you are reading Sartre...

This philosophical novel by Sartre is truly a remarkable piece of work. It begins with great promise, captivating the reader's attention from the very start. As the story progresses, it maintains a high level of quality, leading the reader on a thought-provoking journey. The ending is also satisfying, tying up loose ends and leaving a lasting impression. Throughout the narrative, the influence of Sartre's philosophical ideas is evident. The themes of existentialism, such as freedom, choice, and responsibility, are explored in depth, adding a layer of depth and complexity to the story. However, it is important to remember that when reading Sartre, one is engaging with the work of a great philosopher. His ideas may be challenging and require careful consideration, but they also offer valuable insights into the human condition. Overall, this novel is a must-read for anyone interested in philosophy or literature.

This is the second book I’ve read of the same author.

It features two protagonists, both of whom will face death. One is killed by her husband, and the other by his rival in relation to political reunions.

The story reflects on the life after death, presenting a pure idea without any religious influence. Death is described as a state where you lose yourself, your last self, when you can no longer see your reflection in the mirror, with no certain explanation for your existence.

It is a death where they call you by your name and a death where you are in your most liberty. The dead people get a chance to witness what happens after they lose their lives, although most of them prefer to escape those scenes and get used to forgetting their past.

Finally, the plot unfolds as the two deceased protagonists start to feel that they were made for each other. At the end, they get the opportunity to live again, but this time as lovers. However, unfortunately and apparently, they find themselves but give up the "love" promise they made to each other in the last minutes. They again spend the time and opportunity to solve the problems they were struggling with at the moment of their death, which are surely society problems.

In my opinion, pure love is unreachable, and there is no place for it in comparison with society-related things such as managing a political union, fighting for the money that was once yours, and rescuing others' lives.

Moreover, thanks to the translator, Hossein Kasmaee, for the extra information in the introduction section of the book. It is truly a great book!

When the meaning and concept that the author has been seeking gets into the story in such a way that you are completely captivated and don't feel the heaviness of philosophy at all, that book comes to mind like water. I had a great pleasure.

It's truly remarkable how some books have the power to transport us into a different world, making us forget everything else around us. In this case, the seamless integration of the author's ideas into the narrative creates an immersive experience. We become so engrossed in the story that we don't even notice the profound philosophical undertones. It's like a gentle flow of water that smoothly carries us along. The enjoyment we derive from such a book is indescribable. It leaves a lasting impression and makes us eager to explore more works by the same author or in a similar vein.

We watched the extremely old movie while reading the dialogue of this play.

To be honest, I truly believe that old literature simply isn't my cup of tea.

The movie was just okay. I didn't comprehend a great deal. Fortunately, we could observe the scenery and listen to the emotions, which gave me a general impression.

Moreover, my teacher was very helpful. She paused the movie from time to time and explained what was happening.

This way, I was able to have a better understanding of the story.

Although I still don't have a strong interest in old literature, this experience did make me realize that with the right guidance and support, it is possible to appreciate and learn from it.

I guess I'll keep an open mind and see if my perspective changes in the future.