...
Show More
I have to start by saying that I'm glad that I didn't know anything about this book or read any of the reviews first. It's nice not to be influenced sometimes, especially as some of what I see as worthwhile qualities other people don't. For instance, I appreciated the pace of the book. I wouldn't have said that it was "too long and wordy" as I've read in other reviews, but then I know that literary styles and tastes change and this book was written nearly 100 years ago.
I also had no problem with the main character, Wang Lung, who had flaws but who seemed to be decent and good-hearted even though not particularly self aware or curious. While he didn't recognize his feelings for his wife, O-lan, as love, that made sense given who he was and what culture he lived within.
I loved the irony of the arc of the main character's life: from poor farmer who feels so small and unworthy to wealthy landowner who gained his land through jewels stolen from another wealthy family and finally, to a legacy of loss when his own sons forget their roots (as farmers).
I also feel compelled to comment on the "controversial" fact that a Western woman wrote the story of a Chinese farmer (not in first-person as the study guide for this edition claims, but in limited third-person). In this case, this fact isn't as negative as some people make it. Pearl Buck grew up in China and spoke Chinese. Perhaps she never lost her outsider status, but I'd bet that as an astute observer of the people around her she got a lot right in her story. If Farmer Wang is at all representative of the Chinese of his generation, then it makes sense that an outsider saw his situation clearly. Certainly, it was the ideas of an outsider (Karl Marx) that finally transformed the many wars and revolutions between the poor and wealthy in China into a permanent change.
I also had no problem with the main character, Wang Lung, who had flaws but who seemed to be decent and good-hearted even though not particularly self aware or curious. While he didn't recognize his feelings for his wife, O-lan, as love, that made sense given who he was and what culture he lived within.
I loved the irony of the arc of the main character's life: from poor farmer who feels so small and unworthy to wealthy landowner who gained his land through jewels stolen from another wealthy family and finally, to a legacy of loss when his own sons forget their roots (as farmers).
I also feel compelled to comment on the "controversial" fact that a Western woman wrote the story of a Chinese farmer (not in first-person as the study guide for this edition claims, but in limited third-person). In this case, this fact isn't as negative as some people make it. Pearl Buck grew up in China and spoke Chinese. Perhaps she never lost her outsider status, but I'd bet that as an astute observer of the people around her she got a lot right in her story. If Farmer Wang is at all representative of the Chinese of his generation, then it makes sense that an outsider saw his situation clearly. Certainly, it was the ideas of an outsider (Karl Marx) that finally transformed the many wars and revolutions between the poor and wealthy in China into a permanent change.