This is a truly lazy and misleading compilation carried out by its editor.

Half of this work is actually a chapter lifted directly from a previously published book. The remaining part is composed of a few lectures, interviews, and discussions that have only a tenuous connection to what is typically regarded as education.

The underlying theme here is what Chomsky has aptly termed "the manufacture of consent." In other words, it delves into the realm of propaganda and how governments, especially his own, along with corporations, misinform and distort facts to serve their own interests and those of their powerful backers.

As always, Chomsky's expositions are rich in facts and laced with a darkly sarcastic tone. His incisive analysis shines a light on the often-hidden machinations of those in power, revealing the true nature of the information we are bombarded with on a daily basis.

It is a thought-provoking piece that challenges us to question the veracity of the messages we receive and to look beyond the surface to uncover the real motives behind them.

Critique of the US Disinformation System

The United States has long been involved in a web of disinformation.

There is a wealth of data revealing the US government's numerous interventions in other countries.

These actions often involve spreading false information, manipulating public opinion, and creating chaos.

The US disinformation system not only undermines the sovereignty and stability of other nations but also poses a threat to global peace and security.

It is essential to expose and condemn this system to safeguard the truth and promote a more just and democratic world.

By shining a light on the US government's misdeeds, we can hold them accountable and work towards a more transparent and honest international community.

No se dejen engañar. Esto no es una crítica al sistema educativo como tal. Sin embargo, es importante reconocer que hay aspectos que pueden mejorar. El sistema educativo tiene el objetivo de preparar a los estudiantes para el mundo real y para sus futuros profesionales. Pero a veces, se enfoca demasiado en la memorización y la reproducción de conocimientos, en lugar de en el desarrollo de habilidades críticas, creativas y de resolución de problemas.

Además, el sistema educativo a menudo es demasiado estándarizado y no toma en cuenta las diferencias individuales de los estudiantes. Cada estudiante tiene sus propios intereses, habilidades y estilos de aprendizaje. Es necesario un enfoque más personalizado y flexible para que todos los estudiantes puedan alcanzar su máximo potencial.

En resumen, aunque el sistema educativo tiene un rol importante en la sociedad, no es perfecto. Hay muchas oportunidades para mejorar y adaptarse a las necesidades cambiantes de los estudiantes y del mundo moderno.

I only gave it 4 stars because a significant portion of what he was saying was completely beyond my comprehension.

However, the parts that I did manage to understand were incredibly enlightening.

No doubt, Chomsky is a modern genius. His ideas and theories have had a profound impact on various fields.

Although some of his concepts may be difficult to fully grasp, the effort is well worth it.

The little that I was able to understand opened my eyes to new perspectives and ways of thinking.

It made me realize the depth and complexity of the subject matter.

Despite the challenges in understanding, I still appreciate the value and importance of his work.

Chomsky's contributions to the world of knowledge are truly remarkable.

I look forward to delving deeper into his ideas and continuing to learn from his genius.

Ojalá el título y la descripción de la contraportada tuvieran algo que ver con el interior.

This simple wish holds a great deal of significance. When the title and the description on the back cover are related to the content inside, it creates a more cohesive and engaging experience for the reader.

It allows the reader to have a better understanding of what to expect before delving into the text. It can also pique their curiosity and draw them in, making them more likely to pick up the book and start reading.

Moreover, a connection between the title, description, and interior helps to establish the author's credibility and professionalism. It shows that the author has put thought and effort into presenting their work in a clear and organized manner.

In conclusion, while it may seem like a small detail, having the title and description of the back cover related to the interior can have a big impact on the success of a book.

Nada relativo al sistema educativo excepto el primer capítulo, que ni siquiera escribe Chomsky, sino Donaldo Macedo.

The book is rather a criticism of the manipulation of the US and Israel in the conflicts of Nicaragua and the Gaza Strip.

There are too many data to retain, and it is quite tedious at times, at least for me. It dwells too much, but it serves to have a global idea of the lack of democracy in the country that claims to be the standard-bearer of democracy.

In conclusion, it was not what I wanted to read when I bought it guided by the title and the synopsis. It seems that the actual content deviated from my initial expectations. I thought it would focus more on educational aspects as the title might suggest. However, it turned out to be mainly about political critiques. While it does provide some insights into the complex issues in those regions, the way it presents the information can be overwhelming and not as engaging as I had hoped. Overall, it was a bit of a disappointment in terms of meeting my reading preferences.

"Que pesao macho" is a Portuguese phrase that can be translated as "What a big guy" or "What a strong man." It is an expression used to describe someone who is physically large or powerful.

This phrase can be used in a variety of situations. For example, if you see a bodybuilder at the gym, you might say "Que pesao macho" to express your admiration for their size and strength.

It can also be used more informally to describe someone who is simply big or imposing in appearance.

Overall, "Que pesao macho" is a fun and descriptive phrase that adds a touch of color to the Portuguese language. It allows speakers to express their thoughts and feelings about someone's physical characteristics in a vivid and engaging way.

Whether you're using it to compliment a friend or to describe a stranger, this phrase is sure to get your point across.

In schools, we are taught the "how" and not the "why".

We gulp down information only to proceed to vomit it out without having remembered it first.

This educational approach seems to focus solely on rote learning and the ability to regurgitate facts. However, it fails to encourage critical thinking and a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Students are left wondering why they are learning certain things and how it relates to the real world.

Perhaps it is time for a change in the educational system. We should strive to teach not only the methods but also the reasons behind them.

This way, students will be able to make connections, think independently, and truly learn something that will stay with them for a lifetime.

After all, education is not just about passing exams but about equipping students with the skills and knowledge they need to succeed in life.

Just a collection of (very good) essays,

yet there are only tenuous links to education.

However, the opening chapter is a very interesting "dialogue".

This collection of essays may not be directly related to education in a profound sense,

but it still has its own charm and value.

The "dialogue" in the beginning serves as an engaging introduction,

attracting the readers' attention and piquing their curiosity.

Although the connection to education is rather weak,

the essays themselves are well-written and thought-provoking.

They cover a wide range of topics and offer different perspectives,

allowing the readers to gain new insights and expand their knowledge.

Overall, this collection of essays is a worthwhile read,

despite its tenuous link to education.

**Expanded Article**

Extraeré lo que me pareció relevante:

La democracia ha fracasado debido a que hay demasiada gente que la teme. Las personas se han vuelto cautivas de mitos que son persistentes porque no se les cuestiona. Son convincentes pues ofrecen un retrato simplificado de una realidad compleja y son antirrealistas ya que disfrazan la verdad. Ni siquiera Abraham Lincoln, el presidente antiesclavista, respaldó plenamente los principios de igualdad, respeto a la vida, libertad y persecución de la felicidad contenidos en la Declaración de Independencia de los Estados Unidos. Cuando afirmó que no estaba a favor de fomentar la igualdad social y política de las razas blanca y negra, mostró una contradicción.

Invadir un país y arrestar a su jefe de estado es una violación de las mismas leyes internacionales que los EE.UU. afirmaban defender durante la guerra del Golfo. Chomsky insta a los lectores a tomarse en serio el desafío de convertirse en agentes de la historia, a trabajar por un mundo menos discriminatorio, más democrático, menos deshumanizador y más justo. En Cambridge, hay un dicho que refleja bien la diferencia: Harvard forma a la gente que gobierna el mundo; el MIT forma a los que lo hacen funcionar.

Si te retrotraes al tiempo de la Biblia, verás que los intelectuales denominados «falsos profetas» trabajaban en pro de los intereses de los poderosos. El escándalo es tan grande que sobran los comentarios. Los estudiantes no aprenden simplemente por una transferencia de conocimientos, que se engulle con el aprendizaje memorístico y después se vomite. El aprendizaje verdadero tiene que ver con descubrir la verdad, no con la imposición de una verdad oficial. Esta última opción no conduce al desarrollo de un pensamiento crítico e independiente.

En nuestra democracia, los miembros del «rebaño» tienen la posibilidad de participar en la aprobación de un líder mediante elecciones. Pero una vez que lo han aprobado, deben retirarse y convertirse en espectadores. Los aristócratas temen al pueblo y desean alejarlo del poder, mientras que los demócratas se identifican con él y lo confían. El objetivo de la educación es educar para la libertad y la democracia, como postuló Dewey, o bien educar para la obediencia, la subordinación y la marginalización, como exigen las instituciones dominantes.

La flexibilidad del mercado laboral significa trabajar horas extra sin seguridad de trabajo, sin contratos ni derechos. Washington consideraría inamistoso que un gobierno extranjero financiara entidades disidentes de los EE.UU. y probablemente no aprobaría que el embajador soviético participara en manifestaciones. La hipocresía no tiene fronteras y Europa está más colonizada de lo que se quiere creer. Ningún diálogo puede desarrollarse entre armas. El discurso de los privilegiados está marcado por la confianza y el triunfalismo. No deberíamos sacrificar nuestro propio interés a beneficio de otros. Los Estados Unidos impidieron la entrada del acero británico con altos aranceles para desarrollar su propia industria del metal. La Revolución Industrial dependía de un algodón barato y la «época dorada» del capitalismo contemporáneo dependió de una energía barata. «Empresa libre» significa que el público pague los gastos y asuma los riesgos. Si te atienes a la línea del partido, no necesitas documentar nada; puedes decir lo que te venga en gana. Es un privilegio de la obediencia. La gente no siempre comprende que un pequeño incendio en una habitación es una amenaza, no porque sea pequeño, sino porque una chispa puede convertirse en una hoguera.

Noam Chomsky's work on Central America in the 1980s makes for a tough read.

He provides a detailed blow-by-blow account of the intrigue and complex events that took place during that time.

The concept of "miseducation" is a common thread that weaves through the narrative.

Often, official policies and the orthodox journalistic narratives deviated significantly from the actual reality on the ground.

Surprisingly, three decades later, the situation seems to be much the same.

The same patterns of misinformation and the gap between what is presented and what is truly happening persist.

Chomsky's analysis serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and looking beyond the surface-level accounts to understand the true nature of events.

It challenges us to question the dominant narratives and seek out the real facts in order to form a more accurate understanding of the world around us.

His work continues to be relevant and thought-provoking, even in the present day.

The development of critical thinking ability is one of the most important goals of education. However, it is sometimes difficult to achieve in a society that consumes so much junk and believes everything it reads or hears from the media.

We are constantly bombarded with a vast amount of information from various sources, and it can be challenging to distinguish between what is true and what is false.

The media, in particular, has a significant influence on our beliefs and opinions. Some media outlets may present information in a biased or inaccurate way, with the intention of manipulating our emotions or opinions.

It is essential that we develop the ability to think critically and question the information we receive. We should not simply accept everything at face value but instead analyze and evaluate it based on evidence and reason.

By doing so, we can avoid being misled and make more informed decisions. We must not let ourselves be manipulated by the false or misleading information that surrounds us.