The arguments presented are indeed sound, and his writing style is not overly verbose, which is a positive aspect.

However, there is a caveat. Unless one is well-versed in the extensive and often complex history of US involvement in Latin America (as well as in other regions where they impose their presence and ideology), some parts of the text can prove to be extremely dense and difficult to navigate through.

This lack of prior knowledge can make it a challenging read, as the author assumes a certain level of familiarity with these historical events and their implications.

It is important to note that while the arguments may be valid, the dense nature of the writing in certain sections can act as a barrier for readers who are not already informed about the specific context being discussed.

Overall, while the work has its merits, it may require additional research and background knowledge on the part of the reader to fully appreciate and understand the full scope of the author's ideas.

This book is not the best one by Chomsky.

However, he delves deeper into his observations regarding miseducation.

Previously, I used to concur with his views on this matter.

Chomsky's analysis of miseducation is quite thought-provoking.

He explores how the educational system may sometimes fail to provide students with a truly comprehensive and meaningful learning experience.

Perhaps there are aspects of the curriculum that are outdated or not in line with the real needs of students.

Or maybe the teaching methods employed do not effectively engage students and help them develop critical thinking skills.

By going deeper into these observations, Chomsky offers valuable insights that can potentially lead to improvements in the educational system.

Although this may not be his best book, it still contains important ideas that are worth considering and discussing.

I thought that in this book, it would offer a critique of the educational system and how we are indoctrinated to be the workforce in this capitalist system.

However, it only talks about the lies that have been told about the government of the United States. That is, it is called "La (des)educación" because it attempts to (de)educate the idea that the USA is a democratic country that has only wanted to "help" other countries when in reality it has done the opposite, and in that regard, it is good.

But it wasn't what I was looking for. And I know I'm giving it two stars only because it didn't fulfill what I expected, but the title and the cover are quite misleading. I would give it a title like: The Social Truth about the USA. Or something along those lines.

If someone is looking for truths about that country, this is your book.

I picked up this book with great anticipation, hoping for an in-depth and comprehensive discussion of the numerous ills plaguing the current school system. I wanted to understand how these problems came into being and explore possible alternatives.

However, to my disappointment, this crucial topic is only briefly touched upon in the first chapter, which is an interview with the editor, Macedo. The best part of the book, in my opinion, is the essay on John Dewey and the connection between education and real democracy.

The rest of the book consists of a collection of various lectures, speeches, and debates that Chomsky has given. The underlying implication is that doctrinal education is partly responsible for the atrocities of US Foreign Policy, which he details extensively throughout the remainder of the book.

While the connection between education and foreign policy is indeed important and valid, it is not what I initially expected or what I believe the book should have been primarily about. It is all very much classic Chomsky, with him reiterating his usual views on specific examples of US Foreign Policy and highlighting the disparities between the stated doctrine and the actual actions.

Overall, although the book contains some interesting and thought-provoking content, it did not fully meet my expectations in terms of addressing the school system issues as comprehensively as I had hoped.

This book was lent to me by Salva.

It is a book to chew on. It feels more like an ongoing conversation rather than a finished process, and that's what I liked about it.

The way the author presents the ideas and concepts in the book makes you stop and think, really dig deep into the meaning.

It's not one of those books that you can just breeze through and forget about.

Each page seems to hold a nugget of wisdom or a thought-provoking question.

As I read, I found myself constantly reflecting on my own experiences and beliefs, comparing them to what was written in the book.

It's a book that challenges you to expand your mind and consider different perspectives.

I'm really glad that Salva lent this book to me, as it has opened up a whole new world of ideas and possibilities for me.

I can't wait to share some of the insights I've gained with others and continue the conversation that this book has started.

Unrelentingly insightful as always,

this piece of writing continues to amaze with its profound understanding and敏锐的洞察力. It delves deep into the subject matter, uncovering hidden layers and presenting a fresh perspective that challenges the reader's preconceived notions. The author's ability to analyze and dissect complex ideas with clarity and precision is truly remarkable.

Each sentence is carefully crafted, packing a punch and leaving a lasting impression. The use of vivid language and engaging examples brings the concepts to life, making it easy for the reader to follow along and understand. Whether it's exploring the latest trends in technology, examining social issues, or offering thought-provoking insights into human nature, this article never fails to deliver.

It is a must-read for anyone who is looking for intelligent and engaging content that will expand their knowledge and开阔视野. With its unwavering commitment to truth and its fearless approach to tackling difficult topics, this article sets a high standard for quality writing.

Fuck Noam Chomsky.

I'd leave it there, but let me elaborate for a few sentences.

I read this when I was twelve years old. At that time, being a twelve-year-old who could read at a 12th grade level, I still couldn't understand his writing. It seemed that he was using unnecessary terms. If it weren't for the numerous footnotes and the absurd nonsense, maybe I could have found some enjoyment in his so-called critique of education in the Western World.

I re-read it when I was sixteen, giving the armchair sissy another chance. However, my opinion didn't change much. If you truly want to explore anarchy, it would be better to read CrimethInc.

Fuck Noam Chomsky.

This book was okay.

Like many other reviewers, I was anticipating a book that centered on the American education system. However, this book is more in line with the rest of Chomsky's work, which concentrates on the media's part in spreading democratic propaganda.

In the initial few chapters, there is some discussion about how schools fit into that context. But then the remainder of the book shifts its focus back to the media.

It seems that Chomsky is more interested in exploring the influence of the media on our perception of democracy and how it shapes our beliefs and values.

While the connection between the education system and the media is an interesting topic, it feels like this book could have delved deeper into the former and provided more in-depth analysis.

Overall, it's an okay read, but not quite what I was hoping for.

From one of the most highly cited scholars of our era, Noam Chomsky, "MisEducation" presents a compelling argument regarding how American education perpetuates the dominant ideology and inhibits individuals from evolving into independent and critical thinkers.

Privatized and indoctrinating systematic propaganda exercises control over education by compelling children to reproduce, legitimate, and uphold the existing dominant social order. Children are not regarded as having an inherent self-worth, and education fails to assist in guiding a pedagogy centered around encouraging investigation, questioning, and the discovery of truth. Instead, schools merely adhere to the social order of stratifying individuals into futures of "haves and have nots" by basing students' values on test scores that are strongly associated with socioeconomic factors. As a common saying in Cambridge exemplifies, "Harvard trains the people who rule the world; MIT trains those who make it work", this establishes a belief in a social order founded on a hierarchy based on intellectual and economic capital.

It appears that those indoctrinated into the current prevailing social order of intellectual and economic worth, including myself (an aristocrat who fears and distrusts people, drawing all powers from them into the hands of the higher classes), relish the advantages of such a hierarchical system, which has led to an unquestioning status quo state of being. There is currently a moral imperative within American education, and the solution to address it lies with those who have the desire to question it.

I really, really liked the introduction or preface, whatever it was. And also the first chapter where he had a discussion with that other guy.

However, starting from the second chapter, it kind of lost its meaning for me. It wasn't talking about anything that I wanted to know, so I just stopped reading. It was that simple.

But while it was good, it was good. :)

Overall, the beginning had a lot of promise and held my attention. The interaction in the first chapter was quite engaging. But unfortunately, as the story progressed, it deviated from what interested me. Maybe if it had continued in a more relevant direction, I would have continued reading. But as it stands, I'm content with having read up to the point where it lost my interest.

Still, I'm glad I gave it a try and was able to enjoy at least a part of it.

As is so often the case with Chomsky books,

only the introduction by Macedo and the interview between himself and Chomsky in chapter 1 are actually directly associated with the education system and its failings.

The rest of the essays are educational but stray to other topics such as lack of democracy, politics, and war.

Blah. The usual stuff I've read a million times from Chomsky.

However, it should be noted that even though these essays may seem to deviate from the main focus of education, they are still relevant in understanding the broader context in which education operates.

Lack of democracy can have a significant impact on the education system, as it may lead to unequal access to education and a lack of input from students and teachers.

Politics and war can also disrupt the education system, causing displacement of students and teachers and a lack of resources.

Therefore, while the essays in this book may not be directly about education, they do provide valuable insights into the factors that can affect it.

Overall, the book offers a comprehensive view of the education system and its failings, as well as the broader context in which it operates.

It is a must-read for anyone interested in education and social change.

I embarked on this with the intention of delving deeper into the realm of education itself. However, what it presented were the various ways in which we are misinformed and miseducated by the media and other external forces.

It was truly eye-opening and held great significance. Nevertheless, the content was extremely dry and did not really align with what I had initially been seeking.

I had hoped for a more engaging and comprehensive exploration of the fundamental aspects of education, rather than focusing solely on the negative impacts of external influences on our education.

Nonetheless, it did serve as a reminder of the importance of being critical consumers of information and being aware of the potential biases and misinformation that can affect our learning and understanding.

Perhaps in the future, I will come across a more suitable resource that can fulfill my desire for a more in-depth and engaging study of education.