On MisEducation

... Show More
In this book, Chomsky builds a larger understanding of our educational needs, starting with the changing role of schools today, yet broadening our view toward new models of public education for citizenship.

208 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,2000

About the author

... Show More
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.
Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.
Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.


Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 55 votes)
5 stars
24(44%)
4 stars
12(22%)
3 stars
19(35%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
55 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More
The arguments presented are indeed sound, and his writing style is not overly verbose, which is a positive aspect.

However, there is a caveat. Unless one is well-versed in the extensive and often complex history of US involvement in Latin America (as well as in other regions where they impose their presence and ideology), some parts of the text can prove to be extremely dense and difficult to navigate through.

This lack of prior knowledge can make it a challenging read, as the author assumes a certain level of familiarity with these historical events and their implications.

It is important to note that while the arguments may be valid, the dense nature of the writing in certain sections can act as a barrier for readers who are not already informed about the specific context being discussed.

Overall, while the work has its merits, it may require additional research and background knowledge on the part of the reader to fully appreciate and understand the full scope of the author's ideas.
July 15,2025
... Show More
This book is not the best one by Chomsky.

However, he delves deeper into his observations regarding miseducation.

Previously, I used to concur with his views on this matter.

Chomsky's analysis of miseducation is quite thought-provoking.

He explores how the educational system may sometimes fail to provide students with a truly comprehensive and meaningful learning experience.

Perhaps there are aspects of the curriculum that are outdated or not in line with the real needs of students.

Or maybe the teaching methods employed do not effectively engage students and help them develop critical thinking skills.

By going deeper into these observations, Chomsky offers valuable insights that can potentially lead to improvements in the educational system.

Although this may not be his best book, it still contains important ideas that are worth considering and discussing.

July 15,2025
... Show More
I thought that in this book, it would offer a critique of the educational system and how we are indoctrinated to be the workforce in this capitalist system.

However, it only talks about the lies that have been told about the government of the United States. That is, it is called "La (des)educación" because it attempts to (de)educate the idea that the USA is a democratic country that has only wanted to "help" other countries when in reality it has done the opposite, and in that regard, it is good.

But it wasn't what I was looking for. And I know I'm giving it two stars only because it didn't fulfill what I expected, but the title and the cover are quite misleading. I would give it a title like: The Social Truth about the USA. Or something along those lines.

If someone is looking for truths about that country, this is your book.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I picked up this book with great anticipation, hoping for an in-depth and comprehensive discussion of the numerous ills plaguing the current school system. I wanted to understand how these problems came into being and explore possible alternatives.

However, to my disappointment, this crucial topic is only briefly touched upon in the first chapter, which is an interview with the editor, Macedo. The best part of the book, in my opinion, is the essay on John Dewey and the connection between education and real democracy.

The rest of the book consists of a collection of various lectures, speeches, and debates that Chomsky has given. The underlying implication is that doctrinal education is partly responsible for the atrocities of US Foreign Policy, which he details extensively throughout the remainder of the book.

While the connection between education and foreign policy is indeed important and valid, it is not what I initially expected or what I believe the book should have been primarily about. It is all very much classic Chomsky, with him reiterating his usual views on specific examples of US Foreign Policy and highlighting the disparities between the stated doctrine and the actual actions.

Overall, although the book contains some interesting and thought-provoking content, it did not fully meet my expectations in terms of addressing the school system issues as comprehensively as I had hoped.
July 15,2025
... Show More
This book was lent to me by Salva.

It is a book to chew on. It feels more like an ongoing conversation rather than a finished process, and that's what I liked about it.

The way the author presents the ideas and concepts in the book makes you stop and think, really dig deep into the meaning.

It's not one of those books that you can just breeze through and forget about.

Each page seems to hold a nugget of wisdom or a thought-provoking question.

As I read, I found myself constantly reflecting on my own experiences and beliefs, comparing them to what was written in the book.

It's a book that challenges you to expand your mind and consider different perspectives.

I'm really glad that Salva lent this book to me, as it has opened up a whole new world of ideas and possibilities for me.

I can't wait to share some of the insights I've gained with others and continue the conversation that this book has started.

July 15,2025
... Show More
Unrelentingly insightful as always,

this piece of writing continues to amaze with its profound understanding and敏锐的洞察力. It delves deep into the subject matter, uncovering hidden layers and presenting a fresh perspective that challenges the reader's preconceived notions. The author's ability to analyze and dissect complex ideas with clarity and precision is truly remarkable.

Each sentence is carefully crafted, packing a punch and leaving a lasting impression. The use of vivid language and engaging examples brings the concepts to life, making it easy for the reader to follow along and understand. Whether it's exploring the latest trends in technology, examining social issues, or offering thought-provoking insights into human nature, this article never fails to deliver.

It is a must-read for anyone who is looking for intelligent and engaging content that will expand their knowledge and开阔视野. With its unwavering commitment to truth and its fearless approach to tackling difficult topics, this article sets a high standard for quality writing.
July 15,2025
... Show More

Fuck Noam Chomsky.


I'd leave it there, but let me elaborate for a few sentences.


I read this when I was twelve years old. At that time, being a twelve-year-old who could read at a 12th grade level, I still couldn't understand his writing. It seemed that he was using unnecessary terms. If it weren't for the numerous footnotes and the absurd nonsense, maybe I could have found some enjoyment in his so-called critique of education in the Western World.


I re-read it when I was sixteen, giving the armchair sissy another chance. However, my opinion didn't change much. If you truly want to explore anarchy, it would be better to read CrimethInc.


Fuck Noam Chomsky.

July 15,2025
... Show More
This book was okay.

Like many other reviewers, I was anticipating a book that centered on the American education system. However, this book is more in line with the rest of Chomsky's work, which concentrates on the media's part in spreading democratic propaganda.

In the initial few chapters, there is some discussion about how schools fit into that context. But then the remainder of the book shifts its focus back to the media.

It seems that Chomsky is more interested in exploring the influence of the media on our perception of democracy and how it shapes our beliefs and values.

While the connection between the education system and the media is an interesting topic, it feels like this book could have delved deeper into the former and provided more in-depth analysis.

Overall, it's an okay read, but not quite what I was hoping for.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.