The only necessary quality for a person to become a good philosopher is the power of wonder. It is not exactly the question of "to be or not to be?" but rather we must wonder about what we are. Are we real human beings of flesh and blood? Is our world composed of real things? Or are we just enclosed in the mind? How can we be sure that life is not a dream?
*
Justine Gardner*
My personal opinion:
Has anyone of you ever feared that one day you were just a fictional character in a story or just an imaginary being in someone's imagination? Has anyone of you thought that your paper creations would come to life and take revenge on you because you played with them in your imagination and gave them a strange or exciting life? For the first time, I spent almost two weeks reading one book. It's not because my passion for reading is weak but rather in the height of its power. But at some point, I stopped because I started to think about what I had read.
The author's way of narration took on a lot of the characteristics of a philosophy and thought professor. Therefore, he adopted the teaching method from a teacher to a student, which is Sophie Amundsen. I was flipping from chapter to chapter, amazed and eager to know more about the history of philosophy. And in each chapter, I would stop and say "aha, Sophie and Alberto are the imagination in this story." Then I would move on to another chapter to make sure that Hilde was an angel as Alberto said and that the Major was a sorcerer. I entered a new chapter and discovered that all my previous attempts had failed and the story was still mysterious. In the end, I was shocked to find out that all of this was Justine Gardner's imagination and that I had fallen victim to this author's amazing reading plot. I tried many times to shorten some of what I had read about the history of philosophy here, but philosophy cannot be shortened. I started...
The book discusses the ideas of previous philosophers in the pre-Christian eras and some of the philosophical groups that emerged at different times. It does not integrate as well with the chapters on philosophers of nature and Plato, Democritus, and Socrates as it does with the modern ones about myths and about scientists and philosophers such as Descartes, Spinoza, Locke, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Darwin, and especially the discussion about Freud and the unconscious mind. I understood Newton's law of gravity to a greater extent.
Some remarks:
*I was amazed by the book and Justine Gardner's ability to simplify the meanings and philosophical concepts. This does not deny my rejection of those ideas that spoke of the existence of God or fate or any idea that is considered among our Muslim beliefs as we Muslims. Also, when some of the philosopher-artists compared God to creating something out of nothing, God is exalted above what is said here.*
*It is noted that when talking about European scientists, it is fair to some extent to mention Muslim and Arab scientists when they are brought up in modern times, such as Ibn Khaldun as the founder of the first social science and others.*