Owning Your Own Shadow: A Jungian Approach to Transformative Self-Acceptance, Exploring the Unlit Part of the Ego and Finding Balance Through Spiritual Self-Discovery

... Show More
This powerful work from the acclaimed Jungian analyst and best-selling author of He, She, and We explores our need to "own" our own shadow—the term Carl Jung used to describe the dark, unlit part of the ego. In this rich work, Robert Johnson guides us through an exploration of the shadow: what it is, how it originates, and how it interacts and is made through the process of acculturation.

Johnson asserts that until we have undertaken the task of accepting and honoring the shadow within us, we cannot be balanced or whole, for what is hidden never goes away, but merely—and often painfully—turns up in unexpected places.

Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
35(35%)
4 stars
36(36%)
3 stars
28(28%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews All reviews
April 26,2025
... Show More
Of all the oversimplified, cherry-picked, idiotic explanations of the shadow, this book takes the discussion down a couple of pegs. His references are vague at best; there is no scholarship between these covers. Just a bunch of overused drivel and examples carved into the shape he needs to support his premise.
This is an excellent example of a patriarchal view of society and the psychic that does not include the feminine principle whatsoever. It twists and turns on itself to prove what the author decided before he sat down to write it rather than an exploration of the shadow. If there were only men in society and not women of equal stature we could find some merit. However, women exist without regard to who men think they are. This fellow is quite clueless.
The other idea an old tired cliche is that the highest form of human relationship is the love/marraige relationship, or the student/guru relationship which is the sacred vessel. If you say so, you surely give no support of this idea. The examples you give are only true if women are empty vessels just waiting for men to give them meaning. So very tired.
I know I can't read She written by the same author, because this book pissed me off so many times the cover is filled with folds and creased acquired from flying across the room numerous times.
April 26,2025
... Show More
Very insightful take on the concept of shadows and how we project shadows in the relationships(especially romantic) we built throughout our life.
April 26,2025
... Show More
The author, a Jungian analyst, reminds that we have not entered adequately into our consciousness, especially our own shadow. Let's face it, typically we do not integrate the shadow (unlit aspect) of our self as a pure and real unity. Help in reaching out to aspects of our true consciousness lies in the sign of the Christian mandorla. The union pictures two overlapping circles. The overlap looks like an almond (It. - mandorla) of the shadow and the individual persona (ego).
April 26,2025
... Show More
Had to read this one for class and am compelled to add this here to warn people. The theory/concept is one that we could all get from the title and identify with. However this book is written from a narrow revisionist Christian point of view of 1 America, 1 repressed Christian to others. Writing things like: our own scriptures say..., and how we hope to emulate Christ is not the most effective voice and does not speak to the rest of America. Know what your getting into with this one and maybe find one where the author isn't working out his own slanted repressions.
April 26,2025
... Show More
It was good until the last chapter. In the last chapter, he starts writing about the "madorla", and there he gets very hippie-dippy.

Otherwise, he does give an interesting, but non-specific way to deal with your shadow--through ritual, such as writing or burning something. I will have to try this.
April 26,2025
... Show More
While Johnson makes a few good points, Robert Bly’s ‘A Little Book on the Human Shadow’ is a far better book, better written and with considerably more depth.
April 26,2025
... Show More
A collection of loosely related thoughts presented as such without any effort to connect them in a meaningful way. Occasional anecdotes about famous people (Marie Antoinette), quotes from a famous psychologist (Jung), concepts from the Eastern spiritual traditions (satchitananda), and numerous and fairly arbitrary selection of references to Christian theology, are peppered through this small book give the impression that the presented claims have validity by way of their disguised but coinciding appearance in different contexts. But these diversions, while they add some color, are presented without any depth or understanding.

I was curious what the psychological shadow actually is and was therefore drawn to this book. The author, at different points in time, argues that the shadow is a) the set of traits that we have relegated from our persona for the sake of conducting ourselves civilly in society and are therefore those traits that are tinged with a morally dubious aspect, b) the set of influences that we may be missing in our lives that carries us too far in some direction, c) the set of positive traits lying dormant in our unconscious that we have not had the courage to explore and have therefore projected them onto others (say, through hero-worship). For the second point he presents the example of the French queen Marie Antoinette who built a rustic cottage with the intention of spending her time milking cows, having grown unbearably tired of the palatial life. Curiously I encountered this very same example in Alain de Botton's "The Architecture of Happiness." For the third point, he makes the claim that psychological projection is not only applicable in the case of undesirable traits, but rather strangely, we can often catch ourselves projecting the best parts of ourselves onto others as well. This is a good point, although this is not something that he makes through careful argument and several convincing examples, but rather something that I agree with by way of my own life experience.

The various characterizations of the shadow may be somewhat misleading and apparently contradictory (such as the first and third) but in reality it would have been simpler if the author had digested these into a simpler thesis that the shadow is simply the unexplored part of our unconscious. As a self-proclaimed Jungian analyst the author is unable to do even the definition any justice, let alone the subject matter.

The book concludes, in what I already came to suspect by the time I reached the middle, that the journey of integrating your shadow is achieving balance across various dimensions of the personality, which entails necessarily the exploration of the unconscious in a more deliberate way. This is a profound truth about psychological maturity but the book simply presents all these things as disconnected thoughts without a deeper structure or insight to any of them. In effect, for someone who did not realize it or suspects it from a critical perspective, then the book would be of little use, and in fact, could push them to believe that all this is nonsense through and through. Therefore I cannot recommend this book.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.