bildigimiz manada somuru duzeninin bittigi dunyamizda modern somurgecilik devam ediyor. bunun bas mimari da tabiki amerika. biz dostuz diyerek iclerine girdigi az gelismis ama petrolu bol ulkelere neler yaptigini ogrenmek icin bu kitap okunmali. ustelik de iclerinden biri anlatiyor. ozellikle su paragraf ustunde kafa yorulmasi gereken bir paragraf:
"dunya ticaret merkezinin, 1960 senesinde David Rockefeller tarafindan baslatilan bir proje oldugunu ve yapinin son yillarda bir yuk olarak nitelendirildigini okudugumu hatirladim. finansal garabet olarak bir sohreti vardi. modern fiber optik ve internet teknolojileri ile uyumsuzdu. ustelik verimsiz ve pahali bir asansor sistemine sahipti. o iki kule bir zamanlar David ve Nelson olarak adlandirilmisti. simdiyse yuk gitmisti."

This is the way the world works.

I had this book recommended to me by A LOT of people and I’m glad I finally got around to it because it is a jaw-dropping first person account of how the US has covertly destabilized other nations for decades in a form of neoimperialism. John Perkins was a man who grew up in a privileged state, yet always feeling under the class that his parents desired. Through mostly happenstance, he found himself in the position in his 30s to be the lead “economist” for a company in the 1970s called Main (now gone). He was literally told he would be an “Economic Hitman” or EHM and his job was blatantly described to him: go to a developing country and set them up to be a US puppet state.

The way Perkins achieved this was by dreaming up an economic plan and forecasting good fortune for a foerign country, getting them to agree to infrastructure building. He knowingly knew that the funds would come from an American bank (or world bank, IMF) and that only an American company would be contracted to build the infrastructure plan. So dollars would never flow into the foreign country. From there, the intent was to burden the country with a subprime loan, knowing full well that they would not have the economic windfall promised. The country would then be trapped with debt and become a puppet state of the American corporatocracy. There is clearly state and corporate collusion going but with no paper trail. This has happened in sooooo many countries: Ecuador, Panama, Indonesia, Chile, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq so many others that this would review would never end if I kept listing them.

Perkins then explains what happens to countries that don’t fall victim to the debt trap. The “Jackals” are then sent in—the CIA which covertly ousts usually the democratically elected leader and supplants them with a puppet dictator setting up a crony capitalism system. If the country is still recalcitrant to the CIA, the US just sends in the military to get rid of the leader by violence and war.

This is what imperialism looks like today.

I found the book to be highly engaging because the author is speaking from his own experiences and has tons of insider knowledge about the economic world order that most people aren’t even aware of. Yet with the personal accounts, there is no doubt unwitting embellishments that likely come along with a book like this. At any rate, I found this to be an extremely worthwhile read. But be careful, it’s one of those books that could upend your world view and change your life.

Other similar books I'd recommend:
The Jakarta Method
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

How to Hide and Empire
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

كتاب من الكتب الكاشفة. خِطر خِطر يعني :D ..


الكتاب بيثبت نموذج مُعين و هو أن :



1 - فيه بني آدم بيبقى مطلوب منه يعمل دراسة اقتصادية عن بلد مُعين بُناء على رغبات مجموعة من المُستثمرين و أصحاب الشركات المالتيناشيونال..


2- تقوم بعض الجهات المانحة - صندوق النقد و البنك الدولي .. إلخ - بإقراض هذه الدول بناء على هذه الدراسات إللي غالباً بتطلع خادعة ..

فالدولة تبقى واخده قرض بمليار جنية على أساس أن العائد من الإستثمار هيبقى حوالي مليار و نص مثلاً بعد عشرين سنة ، تطلع الدراسات أكتر كتير من المتوقع و تعجّز الدولة عن سداد الديون المُستحقّة ..

3- تتعثّر الدولة عن سداد ديونها .. فتبدأ بقى تُذعن للدول و المؤسسات الدائنة .. عن طريق إمرار صفقات اقتصادية ، بيع أراضي ، تجارة سلاح ، تصويتات في الأمم المتحدة .. و هكذا

4- تبدأ المؤسسات الكُبرى في هذا الخط من الإستعمار و الإذلال الإقتصادي للدول و بناء مُجتمعات داخل كل دولة ، المجتمعات دي هي النُخبة الإستعمارية .. إللي بتبقى أكتر ناس مُنتفعة من التبعية دي


دا النموذج التجريدي .. النموذج دا إتطبّق بقى بشكل عام في جواتيمالا و بنما و الإكوادور و إيران و فنزويلا و بلاد كتير ..


الفكرة أن الوقوف أمام هذا النوع من الإستعمار مش هيمُر مرور الكرام .. لأ ..

هيطلع الصف التاني من الجنود إللي شغالين تحت الكوربوقراطية * .. إللي هما رجال المخابرات إللي بيتم الإستعانة بيهم لتنفيذ إغتيالات لأمرار مشروعاتهم ..

و لو فشل الخط الدفاعي التاني دا .. يتم عمل حملة إعلامية ضخمة ضد الدولة دي و رموزها و يتم عمل غطاء إعلامي و أخلاقي لحرب من أجل الإسعمار ..


كتاب مهم و قيّم جدا .. لو عرفت تقراه و تجيب منه 10 نسخ توزّعهم على صحابك هدية .. ما تترددش ..

كتاب يوضح لنا كيف تهيمن امريكا اقتصاديا على دول العالم الثالث عن طريق ايهام تلك الدول بان امريكا سوف تساعدهم لبناء مشروعات وخطط لتنمية للبلد وتلك المساعدات عن طريق ديون وتستغل امريكا الديون لجعل الدول تحت امرها لتستغل مواردها الطبيعية كالبترول او فى حالة التصويت فى الامم المتحدة وجعل تلك الدول تبيعة لهم ولا يمكن ان تتحرر اقتصاديا.....
ويبين ايضا الكتاب كيفية اختلاط المال بالسلطة فى امريكا مثل مكنمار رئيس فورد الذى اصبح وزير دفاع فى عهد كنيدى !!! ثم رئيس البنك الدولى.... وبوش الاب انه احد ملاك شركة يوناتيد فروت العالمية وبسبب تلك الشركة دبرت امريكا انقلاب فى جواتيمالا للاطاحة برئيسها المتخب اربينز .

If nothing else this book is a time line of geopolitical/military events that the US was involved with from the 70s through the 2000s.

It was a basic review of the US in Indonesia, Ecuador, Colombia, Panama, Iran, Saudi and Iraq. It was not an 'eye opener', nor was it sourced very well. His references were journalists - the same journalists that he links to the corporatacracy he so loathes (and blames).

The author illuminates the underground world of the Economic Hit Men that were basically recruited by the NSA to economically infiltrate underdeveloped nations, get them hooked on our loans and keep them hooked, so that the US could 'call on their pound of flesh' - his favorite term - whenever we needed it. This was by no means hard to believe. But the part that was so damn annoying was his droning on about his 'guilt' about the whole thing. For. Thirty. Years. The man loved money, first class travel, ladies and bonuses too much to give up on the horrible behavior he was having such a hard time living with....while sailing on his boat in the British Virgin Islands.

Of course, if you were to believe him, he was also Mr. Popular. In all of the nations he worked in, he was befriended by someone, a local, an insider, someone...they would share with him their struggles - because they trusted him - and he would listen, feeling even more guilty, but putting the plan into action. The plan, to manipulate all of these nations, primarily the indigenous populations whose homes were being lost to land devastation by the large oil companies that were moving in.

He then went on an on about how the average American just couldn't understand it. It was too complex to know that the shit that was going on in South America was not on the up and up. Right. Sure, the NYTimes, LATimes and Washington Post readers are all obtuse Americans that just took the geopolitical and military movements of the US Government at face value. Does everyone pay attention, certainly not, but clearly people in the 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s were capable of questioning (and many did) the moves of our nation.

And to top it off, not only did he call us stupid for the first 200 pages, he decided to become a complete and utter raging self righteous asshole for the last 20. He lectured the reader about how they basically need to pick up the slack and fix this problem by improving their way of life, becoming green and taking care of the environment. Excuse me? His intermittent apology throughout was vapid, to say the least, but the closing of the book clearly illustrated the mans struggle with reality.

The real kicker - the corporatacracy that he so loathes, yet helped to build - is all of us. He says, on page 217: "It would be great if we could just blame it on a conspiracy, but we cannot. The empire depends on the efficacy of big banks, corporations, and governments - the corporatacracy - but it is not a conspiracy. The corporatacracy is ourselves - we make it happen - which, of course is why most of us find it difficult to stand up and oppose it."

What is this, so new aged mumbo jumbo about how we are to better ourselves? Is he some shaman that tells it like it is, gives us the tough dose of medicine and then wipes his hand of any involvement? It gets better, on page 219, I believe he is comparing himself to Paul Revere when he says: "I thought again of that other man, that lone rider galloping through the dark New England countryside, shouting out his warning." What? What? I guess it's a good thing Revere didn't wait 30 years to warn the patriots.

This man is delusional, not in his assessment of how the US 'supposedly' has acted; but in his culpability. He's all of a sudden contrite and confessional and boom - he's our savior. He even goes on to write: "Now it's your turn. You need to make your own confession."

The author needs to get off his high horse. Some of us, practically all of us, had nothing do with the crap HE perpetuated on millions of indigenous peoples in the name of corporate oil profits.

Ok, so as I finished reading this book, I can say I successfully landed on 3 main conclusions!

Yet, before I share them, let me brief you on what this book talks about. Interestingly enough and as the title suggests, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man is a real-life story of a person who played a role in reinforcing and mushrooming the system of marching into a global empire of America. Nonetheless, trapped in consciousness, guilt and willingness to save the next generations-as he puts it-Perkins chooses to unveil the truth that many are not aware of.

Economic Hit Man refers to the unofficial title a number of economists who work for big-shots American corporations, and whose role is considered to be double agents for both those commercial corporations and the U.S Administration and specifically the CIA.

The job of those EHMs is to make overestimated-yet-scientifically-proved economic forecasts and statistics to convince 3rd world countries to start investing in their resources and lunch national projects. Those EHMs work for huge American corps. specializing in construction engineering..etc as well as Oil companies. Such a so-called “humane” action initiated by the States is done on a condition that the ones carrying out the national projects should be its own American corps. and companies. Of course with the help of-again-with the U.S humane and financial aid from its World Bank and IMF. The scenario ends with a country that’s drastically in huge debts to the U.S which leaves its –usually corrupt- government to be an official puppet of the U.S allowing the American imperialism to expand further. Such an imperialism would be reflected in U.S military installations that exist everywhere, controling UN votes and many more that result in controlling world economic and political system!

Additionally, Perkins condemns and blames the capitalistic increasing approach-promoted mainly by U.S- which does nothing but leaves the rich much richer and the poor way much poorer; a system that successfuly creates a new form of slavery.

This is a rough idea about what was the major talking of this book; of course the story has many more dimensions.

Now whether the concept of EHM truly exists or not, whether the author was truthful in what he has said or not, any one pays a close attention to the U.S Administration and foreign policy over the past decades he won’t find the content of this book to be surprising! And no ! it’s not a conspiracy-like analysis but a true discloser of the dirty way of getting business done by U.S and its puppet governments elsewhere.

The book is a very interesting read and brings lots of interesting issues and events to the table although reliability sometimes might be questionable.

One of the most parts I liked was the way he looked at the event of 9/11. I personally share his views in this regard.

One thing I didn’t like was the author way of dramatizing things especially when it comes to his past. But truth be told, his writing style is extremely good, and he’s so smart in the way he plays on the reader’s emotions especially the American one, I believe.

Now come to my 3 conclusions that I still didn’t share after all this bla-blaing..

Con#1 : the book is very inspirational read to rebel against corruptive systems and say NO even if those systems are the hands that feed you. Fighting for freedom, equality and humane living is way much worthy than the rewards-or the so-called ones- gotten from turning a blind eye to or serving those corrupts.

Con#2 : we don’t live in a rosy and bubbly world where everyone does everything for the good deeds! Humanitarian aids and support..!! please go wash your face and wake up !! Yet, I don’t believe in conspiracy theories and I believe no one should. The thing is: everyone has his owns hidden agenda that suits his own interests. So, sorry to break the news to you but no one serves the other for the apple of his eyes !

Con#3 : many 3rd world countries had its blood soaked up by the U.S because those countries lacked the needed knowledge, technologies, industrial capabilities..etc where the U.S has it. So no wonder such countries would be trapped in the U.S modern empire as they needed to progress and modernize. I felt utterly depressed; is a gap that until now we couldn’t fill in and until we do, we will be always trapped, dependent and extremely weak.

ياريت دعاتنا اللي فلقونا بوعظهم البائس و تحذيرهم الساذج من "التغريب" والمؤامرات العالمية علينا.. يركزوا طاقاتهم و جهودهم على دعوة المجتمع انو يخرج مهندسين طاقة وعلماء اقتصاد وسياسيين وباحثين في كل العلوم متفوقين في مجالهم واهم من كدا مؤمنين في قدراتهم بإنهم يقدروا يغنوا مجتمعاتهم عن الاستعانة بالخبرات الاجنبية

نحتاج يكون عندنا اكتفاء ذاتي ، نحتاج يكون عندنا خبراء و باحثين محنكين ، واهم من كدا نحتاج يكون عندنا حكومات تثق بالسواعد المحلية !

Wow ! this book triggered A LOT !!!!!

آدم نمی‌دونه درباره این تیپ کتابها چی بگه. واقعیت‌های درستی که به بیانی سطحی‌ و داستان‌سرایانه بازگو شدن. بیشتر به یک‌جور رمان تحلیلی تاریخی علیه سرمایه داری شبیه بود تا یک روایت واقعی از یک کارشناس اقتصادی که تو سیستم سرمایه داری استخون خرد کرده.

The friend who lent me this book recommended it highly. I think he was too easily impressed.

International aid is obviously tied in to international politics and diplomacy. Aid has an agenda – obviously. And yes, it is true that, especially with US aid in the period being discussed, a lot of money was funnelled back to the USA, paid to American contractors who implemented the projects the aid was supposed to fund. But this is old news, and pretty much what one might expect anyway.

Nearly all international aid comes with strings attached. The thing is, everyone's pulling on those strings at once. I myself have worked as a planning facilitator in the development sector and seen how all the different parties involved in a project try to further their own agendas and make certain their own slice of the cake is as big as they can make it. Every party involved in the development-aid process, not just donors and foreign contractors but governments in recipient countries, local contractors, industrial, commercial and community interests, all have their own agendas. That's human nature; it is hardly news.

I went to Perkins's book hoping for some specific revelations of corruption or wrongdoing, or new insights on old revelations, with perhaps the identification of specific, real-world wrongdoers. Instead of that, he simply makes out that all of the above is news, and although he disclaims the existence of any overt conspiracy, he is essentially pushing a conspiracy theory. The who are the conspirators? Oh, the tired old military-industrial complex, their 'puppets' in Washington, and a few third world tyrants.

Ho hum.

Perkins talks about how he was encouraged to inflate his forecasts of economic growth to help justify higher aid budgets and contractors' fees. Yes, well, it happens all the time. Forecasting is an uncertain business, and people milk it for what they can. More ho hum.

And then the big 'revelation': Perkins tells us that what can easily be explained by simple greed, international power politics and human nature is actually a deliberate conspiracy. How does he know? A colleague told him – a female colleague who was assigned to train him when he joined MAIN, a big engineering consultancy firm, and with whom he had an affair, and who subsequently disappeared. When did she tell him? During one of their secret assignations at an apartment she had rented. Who was she, then? He only gives us a first name. What was her evidence? None.

How convincing.

He also offers accounts of a bargain he made with Omar Torrejos, the late president of Panama, to present honest forecasts in exchange for Panamanian infrastructure contracts for MAIN. Secret meeting again; no witnesses, not even a date or time given for the meeting. He talks about meeting a secret opponent to the Shah of Iran and being given various (dull) revelations. Who was the opponent? He is only identified as 'Doc'. What did he look like? Perkins doesn't know, because the man's face was in shadow, but he does tell us – a nice creepy touch – that the man had had his nose cut off.

I somehow made it past the halfway mark of this pile of generally known fact, conspiratorial speculation and not-very-exciting innuendo. I shall go no farther. What a load of old rubbish. That it was a best-seller simply revalidates the old saying that nobody ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the public.

The author of this book, John M. Perkins (not the same person as the Christian anti-racism activist), devoted the early part of his career to the planned exploitation of Third World economies on behalf of the interests of corporations, primarily American. He represents himself as one of many and his activities as being wholesale. Now, presumably repentent, he has become an advocate of traditional cultures worldwide.

Reading his story has reminded me of a young friend I have. Recently returned from a year's "service" in Afghanistan, I've pumped him for information of what it was like to be part of the U.S. military presence there. That didn't sound very interesting at all--his work being primarily to inventory munitions, but his attitude about what he was doing was. When asked what he thought we were doing there he said we were fighting the 9/ll terrorists. He had no idea that the purported highjackers were mostly Saudis, nor that Osama bin Laden wasn't an Afghani. Coming from a viewer of Fox television, this degree of ignorance would be appalling enough, but this guy had just spent a year there with hundreds of other volunteer soldiers. Presumably the subjects of 9/11 or of their mission would have come up in conversation. Does this imply that most of them are so woefully ignorant of what they're doing and why they are doing it?

People like my friend--for he is a very nice fellow--and Mr. Perkins, one of them simply misinformed, the other oh-so-clever, and what they do to others trouble me deeply.

From Developing Countries into Debt Driving Saul to Philanthropic Paul.

Please note that I put the original German text at the end of this review. Just if you might be interested.

What a career the man has laid down, someone has to imitate him first. By getting married, he comes into position, at a very young age, to assist in building up the structures to destabilize the economy of countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia, and to move up rapidly. He does not shy away from believing only statistics that he has falsified in the interests of the client and can justifiably be considered as one of the birth assistants of recent semi-legal white-collar crime.
To the point where his conscience surpasses him, and he becomes a dedicated political activist, which costs him the impeccable nimbus of his American clients and because of the devastation he has done the discreetly hypocritical effect. However, still around worlds better than the spearhead of predatory capitalism to direct and train.
The tactics are terrifyingly simple and quickly explained. Billions of credits are offered to emerging countries, although they may be invested in meaningful infrastructural measures, this rarely happens. Somewhat, large-scale projects such as dams, power plants, heavy industry, access roads and logistics capacities for the exploitation of raw materials, including the awarding of contracts to American and European consortiums, are being pushed forward.
It should be noted, however, that these are credit spreads which should never be given to states from the perspective of a realistic repayment option. Moreover, the loan installments, the term or even the loan interest after signing the contracts to change one or the other comma, belongs to the product portfolio of men and women, let's put it polemically, business killers.
Fails a state now desperate for credit, debt cuts or national bankruptcy puffing on the hook, in his desperation to hold on to any straw, comes the generous offer. One could merely privatize and save to death the entire infrastructure, water, electricity, social services, healthcare or take the whole of natural resources at dumping prices for debt repayment. No problem, let's talk.
John Perkins still looks like an excellent, glittering, distinguished gentleman compared to the alternatives that can be offered... For who comes when the provided billion credits are scandalously rejected? Those, as he calls them, jackals, the specialists washed with all the finesse of asymmetric warfare and incitement tactics. Among other things, it was to start a coup, to bring demagogues and dictators to power and annoying democratically legitimized, to make matters worse perhaps even from the indigenous population originating supporters to catch the right flight.
Also, if that does not help, they quickly declare war and march in. Regardless of how many economically motivated battles have taken place over the past few decades, let everyone get a picture of themselves, opinions differ widely, but a few dozens will.
The entire history of the second half of the twentieth century and beyond, including the stories of one John Perkins, is to be viewed under a different light, subtly deviating from official historiography. Sometimes his explanations of events are much more coherent, logical and understandable than other well-founded and scholarly essays on the subject such as: "These are communists, terrorists, TINA, etc.!"

Vom Entwicklungsländer in Schulden treibenden Saulus zum philanthropischen Paulus.

Was für eine Karriere der Mann hingelegt hat, muss ihm erst mal jemand nachmachen. Durch gutes Einheiraten gelangt er in recht jungen Jahren in die Position, beim Aufbau der Strukturen zur Destabilisierung der Wirtschaft von Ländern in Afrika, Lateinamerika und Asien mitzuwirken und rasch aufzusteigen. Er scheut nicht davor zurück, nur Statistiken, die er selbst im Sinne des Auftraggebers gefälscht hat, Glauben zu schenken und kann mit Fug und Recht als einer der Geburtshelfer der modernen halblegalen Wirtschaftskriminalität gelten.
Bis zu dem Punkt an dem ihn sein Gewissen überkommt und er zum engagierten Politaktivisten wird, was ihm zwar den einwandfreien Nimbus bei seinen amerikanischen Auftraggebern kostet und angesichts der Verheerungen, die er angerichtet hat, dezent scheinheilig wirkt. Aber immer noch um Welten besser ist als weiter die Speerspitze des Raubtierkapitalismus zu dirigieren und auszubilden.
Die Taktik ist erschreckend simpel und schnell erklärt. Armen Ländern werden Milliardenkredite angeboten, wobei es auch aus Versehen vorkommen kann, dass diese in sinnvolle infrastrukturelle Maßnahmen investiert werden, was aber selten passiert. Viel eher werden Großprojekte wie Staudämme, Kraftwerke, Schwerindustrie, Erschließungsstraßen und Logistikkapazitäten zur Ausbeutung der Rohstoffe samt der Vergabe von Aufträgen an amerikanische und europäische Firmenkonsortien forciert.
Wohlgemerkt in Kreditgrößenordungen, die den Staaten unter dem Gesichtspunkt einer realistischen Rückzahlungsmöglichkeit niemals vergeben werden dürften. Und die Kreditraten, die Laufzeit oder überhaupt gleich die Kreditzinsen nach Unterzeichung der Verträge mal flugs um das eine oder andere Komma zu modifizieren, gehört zum Produktportfolio der Herren und Damen, formulieren wir es polemisch, Wirtschaftskilller. Zappelt ein Staat nun verzweifelt nach Kreditaufschub, Schuldenschnitt oder Staatsbankrott schnaufend am Haken, um sich in seiner Verzweiflung noch an irgendeinem Strohhalm festhalten zu können, kommt das generöse Angebot. Man könne doch die gesamte Infrastruktur, Wasser, Strom, Sozialleistungen, Gesundheitswesen schlichtweg privatisieren und zu Tode sparen oder die gesamten natürlichen Ressourcen zu Dumpingpreisen zur Schuldentilgung hernehmen. Alles kein Problem, die lassen mit sich reden.
Wobei John Perkins im Vergleich zu den Alternativen, die geboten werden können, noch wie ein feiner, mit Glacehandschuhen agierender, distinguierter Gentleman wirkt. Denn wer kommt, wenn die angebotenen Milliardenkredite skandalöserweise abgelehnt werden? Die, wie er sie nennt, Schakale, die mit allen Finessen der asymmetrischen Kriegsführung und Verhetzungstaktik gewaschenen Spezialisten. Unter anderem darin, einen Putsch anzuzetteln, Demagogen und Diktatoren an die Macht zu bringen und lästige demokratisch legitimierte, zu allem Überfluss vielleicht auch noch aus der indigenen Bevölkerung stammende Staatsüberhäupter, den richtigen Flug erwischen zu lassen.
Und wenn auch das nichts hilft, erklärt man flugs den Krieg und marschiert ein. Darüber, wie viele wirtschaftlich motivierte Kriege in den letzten Jahrzehnten stattgefunden haben, möge sich jeder selbst ein Bild machen, die Meinung divergiert diesbezüglich stark, ein paar Dutzend werden es aber doch gewesen sein.
Die gesamte Geschichte der zweiten Hälfte des 20 Jahrhunderts und darüber hinaus ist unter Einbeziehung der Erzählungen eines John Perkins unter einem anderen, dezent von der offiziellen Geschichtsschreibung abweichenden, Licht zu betrachten. Mitunter sind seine Erklärungen für Ereignisse wesentlich schlüssiger, logischer und nachvollziehbarer als andere wohlfundierte und wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen zu dem Thema wie: „ Das sind Kommunisten, Terroristen, TINA, usw.!“

مؤلم وصادم، أحيانا يتخيل المرء أنه لن يسمع أسوء مما عايشه في العالم العربي لكن يستمر الواقع في ابهارنا بمدى قبح ووحشية الإمبريالية.
الكتاب مقبض لأبعد حد.
وأشيد بالترجمة المتقنة..

كتاب مثير,لو قال لى احدهم انك ممكن تقرا كتاب اقتصاد مثير
بالتاكيد كنت سوف اجيبه انك تبالغ
لكن تلك حقيقه ذلك الكتاب لجون بيركنز,هو كتاب قوى من حيث المحتوى
انه ليست مجرد كتاب يفضح الاميبراليه العالميه وسيطره الشركات الكبرى ,انه مثير من حيث الاعترفات واسلوبها والصراع النفسى الذى تعيشه مع الكاتب
اما عن محتوى الكتاب,فانه هناك معلومات يتداولها البعض ولكن عندما تتاكد من اصل تلك المعلومات وعندما تعرف تفاصيلها تعرف بشاعه الحقيقه مثل حقيقه التامر على رئيس بنما وحقيقه النهضه فى المملكه العربيه السعوديه وغسيل الاموال
كيف ان العراق انقذت فنزويلا
لكن اجمل ما اعجبنى بالكتاب هو وصفه ورؤيته لتلك القبائل التى يعتبرها البعض بدائيه ولكنها تتثقف وتقرا عن اخبار العراق حتى لو لم يجيدوا القراءه
انك تطوف فى عالم كامل من السرح والجمال والاثاره والبشاعه
استمتع بكتاب جون بيركنز