...
Show More
It was truly an outstanding idea to combine these two books into a single volume. One of them is the first true Gothic novel, while the other serves as a critical response to it, which unfortunately led to a lifelong feud between the authors. Reeve's story was intended as a counter to Walpole's. It was a critical alternative that aimed to tell a similar tale without relying on supernatural elements, which Reeve regarded as a form of cheating. Oh Clara, if only you could witness what is popular nowadays. I have read both novels previously, but reading them consecutively and together in this way enables a more in-depth comparison. Moreover, from a marketing perspective, it is a fun and clever approach to repackage and sell two books that many readers already possess. Regarding the aforementioned comparison, Walpole emerges victorious. Firstly, he wrote the story first, and Reeve utilizes his concept to interpret as she deems fit. Additionally, the supernatural element, which Reeve scorned, is well-received in the Gothic tradition and enhances the story. Interestingly, Reeve might have been better off simply sharing her story without the initial comparison. It is a good book in its own right and could have stood independently. However, it only suffers when compared, not to mention that the accompanying sneering criticism was off-putting in nature.