This is an excellent book.

It is remarkable in its content and in the formulation of democracy and how it functions in many of the societies around the world that claim to be democratic.

It also reveals the methods of indoctrination that are employed and the way of penetrating minds in a wonderful and systematic manner by presenting real examples from history.

By reading this book, one can gain a deeper understanding of the true nature of democracy and the various challenges and issues that it faces.

It provides valuable insights into how different societies have implemented democratic principles and the successes and failures that have occurred along the way.

Overall, this book is a must-read for anyone interested in learning about democracy and its role in modern society.

Control of the Media:

1. The ability to control the errant segment.
2. The principle of controlling public opinion.
3. Occupying the segment with what is not beneficial and only for the benefit or support.
4. Making the opponents always insignificant and unable to find what supports their thoughts.
4. When the segment fails due to internal reasons such as serials and matches, you have the permission to scare them from an external enemy and they even adopt your opinions without hesitation or discussion.
5. The principles are no longer fulfilled except for the benefit, especially in the political field.
6. Terror is a relative term...defined by the one in power.
7. The world is ruled by force, not by law.

From the books that I benefited from a lot and was surprised that the author is American and Jewish by religion.

In today's world, the control of the media has become a crucial aspect. The ability to control the errant segment ensures that the narrative is shaped in a particular way. The principle of controlling public opinion allows for the manipulation of the masses. Occupying the segment with non-beneficial content serves the interests of those in power. Making opponents insignificant restricts the diversity of thoughts. When the segment fails internally, scaring the people with an external enemy becomes a tactic. The principles are often bent for the sake of benefit, especially in the political realm. Terror is a relative term, defined by those in power to suit their needs. Sadly, in this world, force seems to rule rather than the law. It is quite astonishing to find that the author of the books from which these ideas are drawn is an American and Jewish by religion.

This shows that the issues of media control and the manipulation of power are not limited to a particular region or religion but are prevalent across the globe. It is essential for us to be aware of these tactics and strive for a more transparent and democratic media environment.

**Expanded Article**

One of the best analytical political books that does not exceed 100 pages is the one I read some time ago, titled "Beyond the State: The Officers' Republic in Egypt". The information it contains is not insignificant regarding the extent of the benefits that the military and officers derive from the army, and these benefits do not end with their retirement from their military positions as they then begin to assume important administrative civilian positions in one of the ministries. In the army, there is no such thing as retirement; rather, they are promoted in various positions, both civilian and military alike.

Yesterday, I happened to meet a dentist who is an army officer. He seemed happy as he was distributing chocolates to the patients, laughing and saying, "These are Sisi chocolates. Not just any chocolates. They are sponsored, you know :'D". And by God, I thought at that time that people's minds were at rest in another incomprehensible world for them to say such things.

When I returned, I resumed reading in the book of Noam Chomsky to see what it is that has led the people to deify everyone who leads this misguided group of humans. According to Chomsky's view, the misguided group is us, the people who do not participate directly in politics like ministers, officials, political analysts, and also journalists. Only the latter group has the right to speak, and as for the rest, they only have the right to watch all that and then either applaud or remain silent.

If the misguided group were to think for a moment - which of course they don't, the gentlemen with the revolving chairs - they would realize completely that they are nothing but a farce. So we only have the right to watch a hot movie - football in our country has become somewhat related to politics, so let's just stick to the hot movie.

Imagine the role of the media in fabricating a consensus politics. The expression of the people's dreams - which have become nightmares - of the homeland - which has become dormant for the interests - of their rights that have been extinguished, legal rights that some and others deserve, no.

Imagine, for example, one of the political prisoners in Cuba who was celebrated as a brave and fighting man and who was subjected to all kinds of torture, and his story spread among the people and he was willing to sacrifice his life. Imagine what he did when he was released from prison. He became a lawyer against the accusations that were directed at El Salvador and Guatemala regarding the accusations of torture that were a fraction of what he himself was subjected to in prison in Cuba! The worst thing is that you are tortured and then you practice it on others. You remain stupid and also cowardly at the same time. And this is what happened in the story that passed.

World is fighting TERRORISM! How the media prepares the people to support the state's ambitions in terrorism and its practice under the pretext of combating terrorism. Russia, America, and Turkey are in the international coalition to combat terrorism in response to the beautiful armament of Turkey and also in response to the brutal actions of Russia against the Chechens. Why is terrorism practiced against those who do not terrorize you?

The answer is simply in the words of Abu Abian, an Israeli politician, that there is a logical hope that those crimes - see how he describes them as crimes! - that are committed against the population will create pressures to stop the military operations against Israel!! Imagine that hope being realized with the killing of 18,000 Lebanese!!

We learn from history that we have never learnt from history.

The text

"offers an impressionistic account, peppered with anarchist doxa, rather than a serious look at how the corporate media is used by the financial oligarchy to foster their class rule"

presents a rather one-sided view. It seems to suggest that the analysis provided is more of a haphazard collection of ideas influenced by anarchist beliefs, rather than a comprehensive and in-depth examination.

To truly understand the complex relationship between the corporate media and the financial oligarchy, a more serious and objective approach is needed. This would involve studying the various ways in which the media is controlled, manipulated, and used to promote the interests of the ruling class.

It is important to consider factors such as media ownership, advertising revenue, and the role of government in regulating the media. By taking a more comprehensive look at these issues, we can gain a better understanding of how the corporate media functions within the context of class rule and develop more effective strategies for challenging and changing the status quo.

I have a certain familiarity with Noam Chomsky's ideas, having come across them in various references and the like. However, I had never actually delved into any of his books. Unsure of where to begin, I selected this particular one simply for the sake of convenience.

Admittedly, the writing could have been improved. There were numerous repetitions, and overall, it didn't give the impression of being thoroughly edited. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the ideas he presents are indeed powerful and of the utmost importance.

Yes, I am aware that many people accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist. In today's world, it seems that anyone who even attempts to view the bigger picture, make connections, and draw conclusions is quickly dismissed as such. Just as anyone who criticizes the banking system is labeled a communist, and anyone who criticizes politicians is called an anarchist (and here I end my sarcasm). The real peril lies in not caring or thinking about anything other than what one is supposed to, or what one is told to think. When that happens, one becomes more easily controllable.

Make no mistake, we are all being controlled in one way or another.

The first part of this book was penned in 1991, and the second part is a talk delivered in 2002. It is disheartening, yet not entirely unexpected, to observe that in the span of 30 years, nothing has changed.

This is such a short but important book.

Despite the fact that it may have some repetitive elements and the writing style is not overly brilliant, it serves as a great introduction to the world of media propaganda.

It offers valuable insights into how the media can shape our perceptions and influence our beliefs.

By reading this book, one can gain a better understanding of the techniques and strategies used in media propaganda.

This knowledge is essential for anyone who wants to see the truth and not be misled by false information.

I wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone and everyone who has an interest in media studies or simply wants to be more informed consumers of media.

It is a quick and easy read that can have a profound impact on how we view the world around us.

The book is gentle and beautiful, but its relevance has ended, especially with people relying on social media platforms to obtain news, opinions, and interact with them, especially in the United States and Europe. This was clearly demonstrated in the Gaza war.

In today's digital age, social media has become a dominant force in the dissemination of information. People are increasingly turning to platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to stay informed and engaged.

The traditional role of books as a source of knowledge and understanding has been challenged. While books still have their place, they are no longer the sole or even the primary means of communication.

The Gaza war serves as a prime example of how social media has transformed the way we consume and respond to events. News and images from the conflict spread rapidly across social media,引发了强烈的情感反应 and calls to action.

In conclusion, while the book may have once been a beloved and important medium, its significance has diminished in the face of the rise of social media. We must now adapt to this new reality and find new ways to communicate and connect with one another.

According to the official definition of terrorism,

the United States is a terrorist country.

And according to the definition of hypocrisy in the Bible,

the United States is a hypocritical country.

And the media is nothing but a means for it to achieve its goals!!

This is the first reading of Noam Chomsky and surely not the last.

What I like most about the book is:

The last chapter: The Next Journalist from the Swamp.

It presents a profound analysis of the media's role in the United States and how it often serves the interests of the powerful rather than the truth. Chomsky's insights challenge us to think critically about the information we receive and the role of the media in our society.

A wonderful and valuable book by Trotsky explains how to shape public opinion to conform to matters and convince people of them, even though they don't really desire them, through the media.

And how citizens are classified into two classes.

The first class: A professional class that analyzes and implements decisions and manages affairs in political, economic, and social systems, and this is a small proportion of the population.

The second class: The vast majority of the population, the passive majority, who are made into spectators only and not participants in events, and are idolized through films, matches, and pornographic films so that they don't realize the true nature of things and make their main concern the provision of the largest quantity of goods or the provision of a rich life like the one they see on television. And if these means don't work, they are scared and threatened that there is a fictional enemy, and they create necessary illusions to make them submissive. Also, they are divided and separated so that they don't unite and do something for their own benefit, which will naturally be against the interests of the ruling administration represented by the government and businessmen.

If these people engage in any collective action or start, for example, demonstrations to claim a part of their rights, the book shows how the media is used to say that they are saboteurs and against the interests of the country and that they must be stopped so that we can live together in harmony. And public opinion is filled against empty concepts like national identity or harmony or the public interest, and people are instilled with respect for military values.

This is exactly what happens in Egypt and in most countries. A corrupt media is controlled by businessmen and a simple people who believe everything the media says. The media made the January revolution into agendas and people who want to destroy the country. The media made the poor interested in films and football and made them suffocate so that all your strength and effort is put into football instead of demanding your rights.

Or through fear. In fact, in Egypt, when a bird flu case was reported, the media announced the entry of bird flu into Egypt, and all the people were scared and panicked. This is of course different from the African Cup of Nations football tournament in 2006. People were interested in the tournament, the colors, and the excitement. Baba Hosni went to the stadium, and he was with Tantawi and Suzanne. And not a single person died in the stadium, and the responsible person fled and didn't even go to jail.

Media control is a significant topic that has been explored by many, including the renowned writer, thinker, philosopher, and linguist Noam Chomsky.

His book on this subject was first published in 1991, which was after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Berlin Wall, and the emergence of American dominance over the entire global scene.

In a later edition, in 2002, after the September 11th attacks, an additional title by the author himself, "Journalist from Mars," was added.

The book, although relatively small at around 100 pages, delves into how the power of propaganda can be the greatest driver for citizens, causing them to choose things they previously rejected, such as agreeing to enter World War II.

The same propaganda continues, albeit with different means, in what is known as the war on terror from the early 1980s to the early 2000s.

This book is truly wonderful as it makes one re-think many things and enhances one's understanding of international politics.

It provides valuable insights and perspectives that are essential for a comprehensive understanding of the complex world of media and its impact on society and politics.

**Control of the Media**

The remarkable achievements of propaganda. For the American linguist, logician, critic, historian, and philosopher "Avram Noam Chomsky", who has been titled "the most prominent intellectual in the world".

A great achievement for Chomsky despite its small volume. Although it seems limited as the Arab thought has developed lately - at least from this perspective - and has superficially adopted the ugly and rotten American imperialist plan for American interests secondly and forever. The Arab thought has developed a political background that is not bad and is in line with confronting the reduction that the American demagogic media impose on others regardless of their identity and regardless of their political weight or fear. It has also uncovered the veil over the eyes of the Arab thought of what the American media promotes in its useful way after the September 11th bombings of ideas that enhance Islamophobia and xenophobia in the minds and actions of its people. This opponent of human progress through the hasty manipulation of public opinion is the best evidence that elitism and populism are outside the boundaries of fairness and equality - which are boasted about - no matter what America or others claim. So the result is closer to the demagogic arguments - the manufacture of consensus - as defined by Chomsky. So elitism will only serve its interests first and it will use the media to support its principles by exploiting the fears and sympathies of the peoples.

Chomsky is worthy of writing with two different definitions of the concept of democracy: The first concept: that the democratic society is the society in which the public (the people) has the necessary means for effective participation in the management of their affairs, and that the media means are open and free. The second concept: that the public is prevented from managing their affairs, and so from managing the media means that must remain under strict control.
Chomsky describes the second concept as - a ruling concept / a concept that is actually used for long periods - and he cites the election programs that are based on spreading the principle of "peace without victory" as a deception of the public will at the beginning of the announcement of its election programs by the Kerry Committee at that time. And in this way, the hesitant position of the people towards the bloody European wars was spread, but it follows a strategy of broadcasting hysteria and shouting in the public consciousness in the direction of "red shouting" - and loading the people against the German threat as an example of what happened in the 1916 presidential election program of Wilson. And this example is the best evidence that there is no radical change in the American strategy, but there is a reactivation of the same outdated strategic criteria with its single guise according to specific agendas. And Chomsky fails to understand the rationality that the sophisticated and trained media tricks take advantage of every time. And we should despise the historical blindness about such media operations as we should despise them.
From Chomsky's point of view, the government, like the media - to the same extent - is just a means in the hands of the large institutions that seek their interests for a certain political gain. Because the government here is no longer serving the people as much as it serves a specific and selected elite from the people, and thus it is neither free nor democratic. While the confused and misled current criticizes its aimless goals towards what the political forces represented by businessmen and large institutions want, and which use the media (its blaring horns) to broadcast a convinced and convincing message at the same time in the minds of its people, the policy of killing with kilowatts and the duality of standards that it is loaded with. And despite this, the world still believes its lies without awareness and considers its word as unchallengeable and its enemy as the enemy of the nations. And this is the height of the distortion of vision. And how many countries have paid the price for their difference with the American policy.. And still some claim that the global awareness is developing! Development does not mean blind acceptance, gentlemen.

Made in America, The land of opportunities..!

First Reading of Tchaikovsky
A brilliant writer on the power of the media
And he filled it with ideas and choices for the masses
And he studied the word "terror" to emphasize that it applies
To America and Israel more than to Muslims

The media has indeed created a revolution on all levels
Even the economic theories that assumed
The rationality of the consumer collapsed with the advertisements

Dealing with the media with caution and skepticism
Is one of the most prominent forms of awareness.