Two wrong concepts must be noticed before discussing the role of governments and Western media in promoting Islamophobia (the pathological fear of Islam). The first of these two myths is that governments in the West represent the will of their peoples and work to achieve their desires. The second is that the Western media is free and independent.

However, governments and the media in the West are controlled and manipulated by large institutions at the expense of the broader public interest and contrary to what the majority of the people see.

For example, a public opinion poll conducted by the "ComRes" institute on Islamophobia revealed that the majority of Britons blame the media for the increase in the levels of fear of Islam in the United Kingdom. The poll showed that blaming the media is more common among young people (14 - 24 years old - 40%) compared to the elderly (65 years old and above - 27%). Also, 33% of those who support this view do not belong to any religion, while 27% of Christians hold this opinion. Although 99% of the people confirmed the spread of Islamophobia in their country, observers emphasized the importance of the media shining a light on the contributions of Muslims that benefited Britain, instead of focusing on troublemakers, and communicating with Muslims to eliminate these negative feelings that harm the social fabric, rather than isolating them.

Interestingly, despite the日夜阴谋 and the targeting of all things Islamic by the nuclear media to slander it, if not destroy it, humanity still prevails as the light seeps through the womb of darkness, and water trickles between the barriers of the rock, and the prophecy of the Quran is fulfilled {"They will spend it [in fighting], then it will become for them regret, then they will be overcome"}. The Times newspaper revealed that at least thirty thousand Britons have converted to Islam, as recorded in the 2001 census in the United Kingdom, and this number is now close to fifty thousand people, most of them women, according to the estimates of Kevin Brass, from the Center for Migration Policy Studies at Sussex University.

What the "ComRes" institute's poll has noticed is called the ideological offensive. It creates an imaginary monster and then makes it easy to rally support for its destruction, as happened in the first recent government propaganda campaign in 1916. When the administration of President Woodrow Wilson - the 28th President of the United States from March 4, 1913, to March 4, 1921 - established a government propaganda committee called the "Creel Committee", it managed within six months to turn the very passionate American people from a state of rest and leniency to a hysterical people who trade in war and rush to it. Their conviction that there was no justification for interfering in a European war turned into a wild desire to destroy everything German and tear Germany apart piece by piece and demand entry into the war to save the world.

In his book (Media Hegemony: The Amazing Achievements of Propaganda), Noam Chomsky points out that after the end of the war, the same media techniques (democratic hysteria) were used to incite the so-called "Red Scare" with strong support from the media and business and industry institutions, which achieved great success. In the 1930s, Hitler learned the lesson. He incited fear of the Jews and the gypsies in his people and implanted in their minds the need to defend themselves by crushing the enemies. In the past years, the great powers have insisted on creating a huge monster every year or two, as the Reagan administration's public relations apparatus did in the 1980s, exactly as the international terrorists, drug dealers, crazy Arabs, and Saddam Hussein - the new Hitler - were later portrayed as if they would terrorize the world and占领 it, in order to keep the people afraid and worried, dominated by cowardice, and thus unable to think.

Therefore, some of what is published in the newspapers is not just "newspaper talk", but in fact, it is coded messages that are intended to explode where the interested parties want, in order to crush those who they want!

A wonderful book in which Chomsky answers how public opinion is formed and how a general opinion is created in an appearance called democracy?

Strike operations are countered by a counter operation, the presidential elections, the Vietnam War before the course of events changes, creating a fictional enemy, the diversity of the communist threat from one period to another, Cuba, and finally terrorism.

This book delves deep into these complex issues, exploring the various factors and mechanisms at play. Chomsky's analysis provides valuable insights into the inner workings of society and the forces that shape our collective views.

It challenges us to question the status quo and think critically about the so-called democratic processes. By examining historical events and contemporary issues, we can gain a better understanding of how public opinion is manipulated and how we can strive for a more informed and democratic society.

Overall, this is a thought-provoking and essential read for anyone interested in politics, sociology, and the power of ideas.

I read this for my Propaganda in the Media class, which I ADORE.

From the engaging content to my awesome professor, everything about this class is remarkable.

If you have the opportunity to take this class, it will be an enlightening experience.

This book provides an overview of the modern history of propaganda and is also incredibly relevant to the current events unfolding right now.

It is truly fascinating to learn the theories behind media control and distraction techniques and how they intersect with democratic society.

The book describes democracy itself from two perspectives, and one of them is quite disconcerting.

It makes you question the true nature of information and its impact on our society.

Overall, this class and the related reading have broadened my understanding of the powerful role that propaganda plays in our lives.

I highly recommend it to anyone interested in media, politics, or the study of society.

If the translation of this book wasn't so bad, I would definitely send it to the "My Six Stars" category. But unfortunately, it brings in the father of the addressee's translation.

However, it was a very interesting book. If it had more detailed references, it would be excellent. But it is obvious that it was written very hastily and several times it carelessly says that the documents of this event exist and you should go and read them yourself.

In this small 100-page book, you will face the bloody crimes of America in every corner of the world.

And this is related to before the Iraq War.

Four excerpts from the book:

"They said that if we bomb South Vietnam, it is only because we are defending South Vietnam against someone. But in fact, in South Vietnam, there was no one else except the people of that country! Our African war is supported by the enlightened people as a "defense against domestic violence"! It was evaluated in South Vietnam."

"In a research on beliefs and tendencies resulting from watching TV programs, one of the questions was what do you think. The casualties of the Vietnam War in China. There were people. While we know that the official answer to the above question is that in that war, two million Vietnamese lost their lives, but in fact, the actual number is between three and four million people."

"They have so terrified the people and emptied their hearts that they have even been deprived of the courage to travel and are huddled under the cloak of fear and terror. It is at this time that you attack defenseless countries in the Third World such as Grenada and Panama and others, and without even looking at them, you crush them and then celebrate your victory."

"They have constantly repeated the idea in the minds of the American people that "Saddam has the idea of conquering the world and we must prevent him from implementing his ideas today." The question must be asked here, where did Saddam really obtain all this power from?! Iraq is a small country without strong industrial bases in the Third World. Iraq was in a continuous war with Iran for 8 years. The Iranians, who had just passed the revolution and had lost one-tenth of their military and most of their regular forces. It was in this war that Iraq benefited from the support of others: America, Russia, Europe, and most Arab countries and oil producers were among this group. Despite all this external support, it could not defeat Iran. But once again, it is said that Saddam wants to conquer the world. Do you know who spread this theory?"

A wonderful book! In it, Noam Chomsky conducts a logical analysis of many concepts and theories that explain how to "manufacture consent" and control the direction of public opinion among people with the aim of achieving a specific goal. The author classifies people into two categories: the elite who represent a small minority and are the decision-makers, and the general public who, in turn, are divided into the educated and the ignorant, and others who have no opinion whether in support or opposition to the system they live under and are called the silent majority for the ease of influencing them.

Among the most prominent means used in the process of directing this silent majority are:

- Propaganda, which is the dissemination of a set of fallacies with the aim of manipulating public opinion.

- The concept of democracy by deceiving the people that the decision is in their hands.

- Supporting the media and advertising system with millions of dollars in order to control it.

- Distracting the people with pleasures so that they remain ignorant and submissive in silence about the fact that they are nothing but a tool in the hands of the elite.

This analysis by Chomsky provides a thought-provoking perspective on the complex mechanisms at play in shaping public opinion and the role of various institutions in this process. It encourages us to question the information we receive and to think critically about the forces that may be influencing our views.

Politicians and corporations often create a deadly combination that poses a significant threat to democracy.

Politicians, in their pursuit of power and re-election, may form alliances with corporations. These corporations, on the other hand, seek to influence policies and regulations to further their own interests.

This unholy alliance can lead to a situation where the voices of the people are drowned out, and the democratic process is undermined.

Corporations may use their financial resources to fund political campaigns, thereby exerting undue influence on politicians.

In return, politicians may pass laws and regulations that benefit the corporations at the expense of the general public.

This can result in a variety of problems, such as inequality, environmental degradation, and the erosion of civil liberties.

It is essential that we are aware of this deadly combination and take steps to protect our democracy.

We can start by being informed consumers and voters, and by holding our politicians and corporations accountable for their actions.

Additionally, we can support organizations and movements that are working to promote transparency, fairness, and democracy.

By doing so, we can ensure that our democracy remains strong and vibrant for future generations.

This short book serves as a valuable tool for busting propaganda in our own heads and understanding the complex relationship between politicians and corporations.

It empowers us to think critically and make informed decisions, without the need for external influence.

By reading this book, we can gain a better understanding of the challenges facing our democracy and take proactive steps to address them.

One of the best things I've read recently is an article that truly captured my attention. It was filled with interesting ideas and engaging content. The author's writing style was clear and concise, making it easy for me to understand the concepts being presented. The article covered a wide range of topics, from current events to personal experiences, and it managed to do so in a way that was both informative and entertaining. I found myself completely immersed in the text, and I couldn't put it down until I had finished reading. Overall, it was a great read, and I would highly recommend it to anyone looking for something interesting to read.

In a democratic system, advertising is like heroes in a comprehensive state.

This was the summary of the book and the most important idea that the author talked about.

The book discusses the control of the media as one of the most important means of "managing consensus" carried out by the ruling corporate class (business institutions), in order to control what the author calls "the misled segment" which usually limits its period to just watching and does not serve its interests. However, sometimes it turns from a viewer to a participant because the ruling system is democratic. From here, the function of managing consensus is to control the participation of this misled segment and convince it to strive for its own interests.

The author mentioned several examples of means of controlling the media and also touched on the topic of defining terrorism that the United States has experienced but does not loudly announce.

It is a very simple book, and its importance lies in the definitions of democracy mentioned by the author and the clarification or explanation of American policy in the light of these two definitions.

Do you support our policy?

This is a very important question that requires careful consideration. Our policy is designed to achieve certain goals and bring benefits to the people. It is the result of extensive research, analysis, and consultation.

Supporting our policy means believing in its principles and objectives, and being willing to work towards their implementation. It shows that you have confidence in the direction that our organization or country is taking.

However, support does not mean blind acceptance. It is also important to provide feedback and suggestions for improvement. This way, we can ensure that our policy remains relevant and effective in a changing environment.

In conclusion, whether or not you support our policy is a personal decision. But I hope that you will take the time to understand it fully and make an informed choice.

Defesa da Democracia

In this short essay, Chomsky attempts to describe how political propaganda lends itself to distorting the truth and promoting the agenda of those who hold the possession of the instruments of power (money and arms/official use of violence). It is about the adoption of an idea of democracy based on the “… moral imperative principle (of) that the majority of the population is simply too stupid to understand things”. Hence the need for “… domesticating the disoriented herd, preventing it from running amok, trampling and destroying things”. The selective dissemination of facts, the control of the population through fear and the “production of consensus” are characteristic elements of political propaganda. The response to this challenge (this attack) lies in the recollection of the facts (objective narrative), especially those omitted by the media. In simple language, Chomsky is successful in presenting his point of view. However, he could have delved a little deeper. The topic is important for a less unjust social order.

This analysis by Chomsky provides valuable insights into the workings of political propaganda and its impact on democracy. By highlighting the ways in which the truth can be manipulated and the population controlled, he alerts us to the importance of being critical consumers of information. We need to be vigilant and question the motives behind the messages we receive.

Moreover, the idea of a less unjust social order is a noble one. It requires us to look beyond the surface and address the underlying power structures that perpetuate inequality. Chomsky's work serves as a reminder that democracy is not just a form of government, but a way of life that demands active participation and engagement from all citizens.

The book discusses the methods employed by the major powers in guiding public opinion towards what they desire through the control of the media. For example, in order for the American government to influence people's views regarding the war in Vietnam, it was necessary to distort the facts and history.

In addition to this, the book also talks about the means that America adopts in the war on terror. According to the author's view, if the countries on which the war is waged, such as Iraq, have committed certain acts, there are other countries that do even worse things but no wars are waged on them. This emphasizes that wars are waged for other reasons.

The book is very good and you can also apply the information in it to the Arab media.

This book provides a detailed analysis of how powerful nations manipulate public perception. It shows how the media can be used as a tool to shape opinions and justifications for various actions, whether it's a war like in Vietnam or the so-called war on terror. The examples given, like the situation in Iraq, highlight the double standards that seem to exist. By presenting this information, the book encourages readers to think critically about the motives behind these actions and the role of the media in influencing our understanding. It also suggests that we should not take everything we see or hear in the media at face value, but rather look for the hidden agendas and true facts. Overall, it is a thought-provoking and valuable read that can help us better understand the complex world of international politics and the power dynamics at play.

This book provides you with a rather good understanding of how propaganda is employed in democracies. It presents examples that we have lived with without even realizing how the media was diverting the confused masses.

However, I couldn't rate it higher than 3 stars. The reason is that I desired to read more details regarding the usage of language or topics in news bulletins and so on. These are the kinds of details that Chomsky didn't fully discuss in this book.

Perhaps if there had been more in-depth exploration of these aspects, the book would have been even more enlightening and valuable. Nevertheless, it still offers some interesting insights into the role of propaganda in democratic societies.

Overall, while it has its merits, it also leaves room for further improvement in terms of providing a more comprehensive analysis of the relevant issues.