One of the concerns about Jung's theory is that it rides on a targeted theory throughout pseudoscience and the use of complex physical concepts (holography - all writing); devouring pseudoscience on the Jungian shadow complex.
The book, similar to its contemporaries - the law of attraction and the set of secret books - is a general description of self-help literature. The author's theory, which is half logical and half a fable, can also lead to a way of criticizing the book: "Do you think the book is yellow and unscientific? Then you are a yellow and unscientific personality, and any defect you see around you is yours."
Is this theory illogical? Not completely! In fact, it can be a tangible and debatable "totality" theory!
Ultimately, the book may have an impact. With a smart filter for sifting out the non-scientific repetitions of the book, from a few tangible sentences of it and compelling the reader to explore the unpleasant qualities that have been suppressed and hidden and of which one is ashamed to have.
After all, the book has nothing new to say after fifty pages. Without humor and playing with repetitive sentences, the volume of the book is reduced to a quarter of its current volume, and this craving for the repetitive literature of the book can also cause the loss of a few new sentences of the book.