400 pages, Paperback
First published September 29,1980
"The Shop" employeemore...
The Boss of "The Shop"more...
Charlies mother and Andys wifemore...
Firestarter takes us on a thrilling journey as we follow Andy McGee and his daughter Charlie. They are on the run from a secret branch of the US government known as The Shop. Many years ago, Andy and his deceased wife Vicky were part of an experiment involving a mild hallucinogenic drug called "Lot Six". After the experiment, both of them began to exhibit supernatural abilities. But what happens when they have a child? A pyromancer named Charlie. She is the center of The Shop's operation, and they will stop at nothing to neutralize her. This book is somewhat similar to Carrie, but with the added twist of being chased by the government and Charlie displaying telekinetic abilities at a much younger age.
I had a great affection for both Charlie and Andy. Andy was truly fascinating, with his heartwarming nature and cleverness. He and Charlie had a relationship that just melted my heart. Charlie herself was precious beyond words. I wanted nothing more than to give her a hug and reassure her that everything would be okay. Their relationship really stands out. I have never come across a better parent-child relationship in a book, and it makes Firestarter unique.
The "horror" in this book lies in the extreme lengths that the operatives of The Shop go to in order to get to Charlie and her father. John Rainbird, in particular, was terrifying. At the beginning, the horrors are relatively mild, and you don't get the full picture. But as the story progresses, you start to wonder if Charlie would have been this dangerous if she and her father had been left alone. King has an amazing ability to make you feel sick and terrified of other human beings, and this book definitely lives up to that reputation.
However, I did feel that some parts of the book dragged a little bit, and I didn't have as strong an emotional connection to the action or the surrounding characters. I really enjoyed this book, but I can understand why it isn't considered one of King's masterpieces. It's just one of those books where you can identify some things you liked and some you didn't, but in the end, it simply comes down to being a plain "good" read.
Raise your hand if you think I need to re-read this novel to change my score. In my defense, I was only 19 :_). At that time, my reading comprehension and perception might not have been as mature as they are now. I might have overlooked some important details or failed to fully understand the deeper themes and meanings within the novel.
However, as I have grown and gained more life experiences, my perspective on literature has also evolved. I now realize that a single reading may not be sufficient to fully appreciate and evaluate a complex work of art like a novel.
Re-reading the novel could potentially give me a new and more profound understanding. I might notice things that I missed before, and my interpretation of the story could change. It could also allow me to better appreciate the author's writing style, the character development, and the overall structure of the novel.
So, perhaps it wouldn't be such a bad idea to give this novel another chance and see if my score might indeed change. After all, we are constantly evolving and learning, and our opinions and evaluations of things can change over time.