356 pages, Paperback
First published September 30,1998
Continually, I force myself to read accounts of historic atrocities. This is not because I have a particular fondness for the sheer horror of man's capacity for evil. Quite the opposite, in fact. I study these books with the intention of understanding how things can go so terribly wrong and what actions I can take to prevent such atrocities from happening again.
Knowing very little about the 1994 Rwandan genocide, I decided to pick up the intriguingly titled 'We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with Our Families' by Philip Gourevitch. After reading it, I cannot help but feel a bit underwhelmed and disappointed. This is a fine book, with thorough research, but it has some stylistic flaws.
Writing a book on recent historic events should not be a desk-bound exercise. A serious researcher should visit the sites, interview the parties involved, and ideally immerse themselves in the culture where the events took place. Not a theoretician, Gourevitch did exactly this. He made numerous trips to Rwanda and its neighboring countries from 1995 till 1997. During these visits, he interviewed not only key figures in the genocide but also regular Rwandans who lived through the horrible one-hundred-day massacre. This results in a wide variety of real-life characters and viewpoints, with the author interjecting noticeably little bias, although he rightfully doesn't let everybody off the hook easily.
Gourevitch's writing style is easy to follow, reading somewhat like an extended newspaper article. He combines facts and figures with personal stories, interwoven with his own account of his travels and interviews. Ideally, this would create a complete picture of the genocide, with subjective and objective narratives neatly forming a coherent story. However, the author only partially succeeded in this.
In books that explore similar events, such as The Rape of Nanking, the author usually emphasizes one of three aspects: objective facts, personal accounts, or the author's own experience. In 'We Wish To Inform You...', it felt like the author wanted each of these three aspects to be equally important, but the whole is less than the sum of its parts. Although it features eyewitness and survivor accounts, most anecdotes are too brief to really impact the reader. The historic events are described, but lack the details and depth of a book like 'Ordinary Men' to gain a deep understanding. The author's own feelings and memories are recounted, yet not frequently or personally enough for the reader to connect with him.
Perhaps this style of writing is better suited for a newspaper article than an entire book, as it left me overall a bit dissatisfied. Furthermore, even though Gourevitch's choice of words is accurate, the style itself can be distracting. By switching between different narratives and times, it disconnects the reader from the story. For example:
So the cleaning lady was a scapegoat; it
was herself whom Fossey was mad at. Leaving her hair lying about like that was bad form: anybody could get hold of it and work a spell on her. I didn’t know at the time that Fossey was popularly known in Rwanda as “the sorceress.” I said, “You really believe that hocus-pocus?” Fossey shot back, “Where I live, if I didn’t I’d be dead.”
Five years passed, and I saw in the newspaper that Dian Fossey had been murdered in Rwanda. Somebody killed her with a machete. Much later, there was a trial in Rwanda, a murky proceeding: a Rwandan defendant was found hanged in his cell before he could testify, and one of Fossey’s American research assistants was tried in absentia, found guilty, and sentenced to death.
Here we find, within two short paragraphs: the account of Fossey in the past, an interaction between the author and Fossey at a later date, the author's memory of an event five years later, and an objective description of events even later. If all the information in this book had been re-arranged into less intertwined perspectives and times, it would have made for a more immersive book. It's far from a bad book; it's actually quite good, but could have been great with a different stylistic approach.
There is a lot to take away from the Rwandan genocide. Lessons about human nature and politics that could perhaps help prevent massacres in the future. These lessons are scattered throughout 'We Wish To Inform You...', and many readers will undoubtedly find some of them. However, due to its style, I fear that some of the deeper messages and understandings might have been lost, which is a shame for such a well-researched and important book.