Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation

... Show More
Life at the end of the twentieth century presents us with a disturbing reality. Otherness, the simple fact of being different in some way, has come to be defined as in and of itself evil. Miroslav Volf contends that if the healing word of the gospel is to be heard today, Christian theology must find ways of speaking that address the hatred of the other. Reaching back to the New Testament metaphor of salvation as reconciliation, Volf proposes the idea of embrace as a theological response to the problem of exclusion.

Increasingly we see that exclusion has become the primary sin, skewing our perceptions of reality and causing us to react out of fear and anger to all those who are not within our (ever-narrowing) circle. In light of this, Christians must learn that salvation comes, not only as we are reconciled to God, and not only as we "learn to live with one another," but as we take the dangerous and costly step of opening ourselves to the other, of enfolding him or her in the same embrace with which we have been enfolded by God.

Is there any hope of embracing our enemies? Of opening the door to reconciliation? Miroslav Volf, a Yale University theologian, has won the 2002 Louisville Grawemeyer Award in Religion for his book, Exclusion & Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation (Abingdon, 1996). Volf argues that exclusion of people who are alien or different is among the most intractable problems in the world today. He writes, It may not be too much to claim that the future of our world will depend on how we deal with identity and difference. The issue is urgent. The ghettos and battlefields throughout the world in the living rooms, in inner cities, or on the mountain ranges testify indisputably to its importance. A Croatian by birth, Volf takes as a starting point for his analysis the recent civil war and ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia, but he readily finds other examples of cultural, ethnic, and racial conflict to illustrate his points. And, since September 11, one can scarcely help but plug the new world players into his incisive descriptions of the dynamics of interethnic and international strife.

Exclusion happens, Volf argues, wherever impenetrable barriers are set up that prevent a creative encounter with the other. It is easy to assume that exclusion is the problem or practice of barbarians who live over there, but Volf persuades us that exclusion is all too often our practice here as well. Modern western societies, including American society, typically recite their histories as narratives of inclusion, and Volf celebrates the truth in these narratives. But he points out that these narratives conveniently omit certain groups who disturb the integrity of their happy ending plots. Therefore such narratives of inclusion invite long and gruesome counter-narratives of exclusion the brutal histories of slavery and of the decimation of Native American populations come readily to mind, but more current examples could also be found.

Most proposed solutions to the problem of exclusion have focused on social arrangements what kind of society ought we to create in order to accommodate individual or communal difference? Volf focuses, rather, on what kind of selves we need to be in order to live in harmony with others. In addressing the topic, Volf stresses the social implications of divine self-giving. The Christian scriptures attest that God does not abandon the godless to their evil, but gives of Godself to bring them into communion. We are called to do likewise whoever our enemies and whoever we may be. The divine mandate to embrace as God has embraced is summarized in Paul’s injunction to the Romans: Welcome one another, therefore, just as Christ has welcomed you (Romans 15:7).

Susan R. Garrett, Coordinator of the Religion Award, said that the Grawemeyer selection committee praised Volf s book on many counts. These included its profound interpretation of certain pivotal passages of Scripture and its brilliant engagement with contemporary theology, philosophy, critical theory, and feminist theory. Volf s focus is not on social strategies or programs but, rather, on showing us new ways to understand ourselves and our relation to our enemies. He helps us to imagine new possibilities for living against violence, injustice, and deception. Garrett added that, although addressed primarily to Christians, Volf's theological statement opens itself to religious pluralism by upholding the importance of different religious and cultural traditions for the formation of personal and group identity. The call to embrace the other is never a call to remake the other into one s own image. Volf who had just delivered a lecture on the topic of Exclusion and Embrace at a prayer breakfast for the United Nations when the first hijacked plane hit the World Trade Center will present a lecture and receive his award in Louisville during the first week of April, 2002.

The annual Religion Award, which includes a cash prize of $200,000, is given jointly by Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary and the University of Louisville to the authors or originators of creative works that contribute significantly to an understanding of the relationship between human beings and the divine, and ways in which this relationship may inspire or empower human beings to attain wholeness, integrity, or meaning, either individually or in community. The Grawemeyer awards given also by the University of Louisville in the fields of musical composition, education, psychology, and world order honor the virtue of accessibility: works chosen for the awards must be comprehensible to thinking persons who are not specialists in the various fields."

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
27(27%)
4 stars
42(42%)
3 stars
31(31%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
April 26,2025
... Show More
Volf's book needs to be read slowly for it is both profound and challenging. This book is a theology of reconciliation. Volf puts forth exclusion of the other as the problem (ch. 2). When we exclude others, keeping them at a distance, we are able to view ourselves as right and just and the other as evil and unjust. This often then leads to violence. The solution to this is to embrace, which does not pretend evil does not exist but seeks to model God's embrace of hostile humanity by embracing the other even in their wrongdoing (ch. 3). This embrace then is the model for how to deal with the clashing of justices in the real world (ch. 5). Embrace also informs how we understand truth as rather than assuming our own truth or hopelessly giving up the search for truth we seek to see the world from the view of the other which then helps us sharpen our own view of truth (ch. 6). Finally, he deals with the thorny issue of violence, arguing that the crucified Jesus of the Gospels and the Lamb riding to victory on a white horse of Revelation are two sides of the same coin (ch. 7). Precisely because evil exists in the world, and because people refuse the embrace of God, judgment by God is necessary. To those who wonder why God cannot simply save all, Volf points out that God forcing people into an embrace would itself be violence. This was my favorite chapter in the book. We Christians are to live nonviolently, taking up our crosses, and trusting God as the only one with the right to judge.

Overall, an amazing book. Highly recommended.
April 26,2025
... Show More
I really have no idea how to evaluate this book. Filled with provoking, gorgeous, and some troubling explorations of Christian theology. Lots of beautiful nuggets (once you've waded through the academic speak, which is DENSE). Note to self to return in time to the chapter on violence.
April 26,2025
... Show More
A difficult but immensely worthwhile read. Excruciatingly relevant in 2020 as I wrestle with the realities of White Supremacy in so many aspects of my life. Volf is refreshingly nuanced with his perspective as a Croatian Protestant theologian. His writing is unflinching in critiquing the shallow analysis of much of American Protestant theology and so so challenging as a non white person that still struggles with racist attitudes while also experiencing racism at the same time. I found myself resistant but undeniably compelled by Volf’s argument that embrace and making room for the other as the good news of the Bible. I think it’s only possible to consider this idea because Volf is so heavy handed in condemning exclusion... not merely as a not-nice thing to do but something that is rooted in the dehumanization of people who are unlike us. His examples of wartime in his home country and other global conflicts do not mince words about violence and the difficulty of ideas like forgiveness without accountability.

I am still pondering his suggestion of “forgetting”.

I am enamored with his suggestion of repentance for the victim being an exhortation to not be shaped by the world’s cruelty and violence. What an expansive understanding of the word repent — so different from the usual moral flourishing, ticket to heaven chatter we get from American evangelical sermons.

Loved his take on the Tower of Babel being a condemnation of imperialism and forced assimilation... and Pentecost being the ability to understand difference and not a scenario in which everyone was made the same.

Loved the metaphor of a physical embrace and what the parts of reconciliation are, both the depth and the limits.

While not an easy read, it is written in my favorite structure: here are these various/famous takes (Christian and otherwise) on this topic, here’s where I agree and disagree. I often found myself revising my conviction a few times as I read.

I ultimately disagree with Volf’s comments about divine justice necessitating violence that enables human non-violence but I will continue to ponder it. I am disappointed at the narrow view of the possibilities within eschatology and his insistence that it *must* be that... but maybe that’s I qualm I have with theologians in general. The reluctance to say “there is a lot of uncertainty here”.

I wonder what Volf would make of the survivors of violence leading the transformative justice and abolition movement today. I wonder what it is about Volf’s own lived experiences that cause him to doubt human capacity for non-violence. No easy answers.

I highlighted many sections and plan to return often to this text. Highly recommend for any Christian who’s trying to be honest about what’s hard about holding scripture with high regards these days and who craves depth when talking about love, justice, and what we’re called to.
April 26,2025
... Show More
I love this book and include it in the top 10 books that have influenced my life. Living in the fault zone between Muslim and Christian civilizations, and having gone through religious riots and killings in our town, the book's message is especially relevant. Reconciliation is something still being worked on.

The book is loaded with insights and nuances that cannot be boiled down to a simple message. However, it is definitely not for everyone. Much of it is extremely academic and as a doctor I could only understand it because I had been doing some reading about postmodern culture, criticism and thinking. As an outsider to Volf's academic discipline, I had the feeling I was reading a message of vital importance encased in something that the academy might accept. If so, I think it was 100% appropriate and hopefully successful. Unfortunately it also limits the audience. It's not a book I can easily get my colleagues to read. I would dearly love to see a rewrite for non-specialists, and have even started editing a readable version for friends here.

Finally, I think that there is something to Rev. Thomas Scarborough's criticism (review on Amazon). I do not agree that the book is in any way shallow, but it does not deal satisfactorily with the difficult problem of what to do when "the other" apparently wants nothing except your own destruction, and where "justice" might seem to require the destruction or at least constraint of "the other." This can be a problem, for example, in extremely abusive family relationships, and appears to be true in some political and religious conflicts. Volf addressed this after September 11 in an interview with Christianity Today, and doubtless in other writings and addresses, but I did not get much understanding of this from the book.
April 26,2025
... Show More
This is a wonderful book, especially in today's political climate.
April 26,2025
... Show More
The idea of embrace is central to Volf’s theology of reconciliation. “Reconciliation with the other will succeed only if the self, guided by the narrative of the triune God, is ready to receive the other into itself and undertake a readjustment of its identity in light of the other’s alterity,” Volf says. This requires a sort of “double vision,” where instead of trying to see things from nowhere, which is clearly impossible, we approach truth both from our perspective and, stepping out of ourselves, from the perspective of our enemies.

See my full review here: http://wordsbecamebooks.com/2015/02/2...
April 26,2025
... Show More
This is heavy-duty theology and a deep dive into non-violence as not “nice suburban ideology”; he converses with philosophers, theologians and a raft of other thinkers. Coming from the terror of the former Yugoslavia’s descent into genocide he does not settle for easy answers this side of a final judgment.
Note: this is the 1st edition; the second has an introduction and conclusion largely re-written to account for the change from any notion of a common humanity and some common truths.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.