Earthly Powers

... Show More
Anthony Burgess, author of A Clockwork Orange, is regarded as one of the most original and daring writers in the English language. His work is illuminated by a dazzling imagination, by a gift for character and plot, by a talent for surprise.

In Earthly Powers Burgess created his masterpiece. At its center are two twentieth-century men who represent different kinds of power—Kenneth Toomey, eminent novelist, a man who has outlived his contemporaries to survive into honored, bitter, luxurious old age as a celebrity of dubious notoriety; and Don Carlo Campanati, a man of God, eventually beloved Pope, who rises through the Vatican as a shrewd manipulator to become the architect of church revolution and a candidate for sainthood.

Through the lives of these two modern men Burgess explores the very essence of power. As each pursues his career—one to sainthood, one to wealthy exile—their relationship becomes the heart of a narrative that incorporates almost everyone of fame and distinction in the social, literary, and political life of America and Europe. This astonishing company is joined together by the art of a great novelist into an explosive and entertaining tour de force that will captivate fans of sweeping historic fiction.

649 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1980

About the author

... Show More
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the Goodreads database with this name.

Seriocomic novels of noted British writer and critic Anthony Burgess, pen name of John Burgess Wilson, include the futuristic classic A Clockwork Orange (1962).

He composed also a librettos, poems, plays, screens, and essays and traveled, broadcast, translated, linguist and educationalist. He lived for long periods in southeastern Asia, the United States of America, and Europe along Mediterranean Sea as well as England. His fiction embraces the Malayan trilogy ( The Long Day Wanes) on the dying days of empire in the east. The Enderby quartet concerns a poet and his muse. Nothing like the Sun re-creates love life of William Shakespeare. He explores the nature of evil with Earthly Powers, a panoramic saga of the 20th century. He published studies of James Joyce, Ernest Miller Hemingway, Shakespeare, and David Herbert Lawrence. He produced the treatises Language Made Plain and A Mouthful of Air. His journalism proliferated in several languages. He translated and adapted Cyrano de Bergerac, Oedipus the King, and Carmen for the stage. He scripted Jesus of Nazareth and Moses the Lawgiver for the screen. He invented the prehistoric language, spoken in Quest for Fire. He composed the Sinfoni Melayu, the Symphony (No. 3) in C, and the opera Blooms of Dublin.

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
33(33%)
4 stars
32(32%)
3 stars
35(35%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
April 26,2025
... Show More
We follow British writer Kenneth Tommey through his adult life. His artist sister Hortense marries a man named Domenico Campanati. Domenico's brother Carlo is a rising star in the Catholic Church. The narration begins post WWI. The rise of the fascist leaders Mussolini and Hitler is roiling Europe. Tommey, an openly gay man, finds success writing for the theater. He is at peace with his homosexuality and defends his right to love whom he chooses. We takes on a few lovers but those relations do not last long.

Much of Tommey's memories and narrative cover his sister Hortense's life. The other central figure is Carlo. Tommey relates his brother-in-law's philosophy, religious interpretations and ascendance in the church. A past lover and poet Val periodically reemerges at events where both men are in attendance. Tommey's work takes him to numerous locals including Africa, Hollywood and the South of France.

The book is dense and written with virtuosity. Though this is a work of fiction, Tommey takes many details and characters from real life. A charismatic religious cult leader named Godrey Manfred is based on the life of Jim Jones for example. Tommey lives a full, but rather simple life. His financial situation is secure. Without any spouse or children, he freely travels, works and lives as he pleases. The narrative style is a memoir written by the aged Tommey. This technique is comprehensive but lacks a driving story arch. We dig into the lives of Tommey and his immediate friends and family and are entertained with a number of interesting anecdotes. Burgess' mastery of the English language and ability to depict realistic dialog and events are impressive. "Earthly Powers" is a stark departure from "Clockwork Orange". It is hard to believe that he authored both impressive novels. "Earthly Powers" is cerebral, confessional and real, but "Clockwork Orange" is the more entertaining and intriguing of the two works.
April 26,2025
... Show More
A very proficient, often moving, often funny, fictional biography of one Kenneth Toomey, gay British writer of pulp novels. Pretty much the entire last century is covered, back and forth from Europe to NA, experienced and related by an erudite outsider.
April 26,2025
... Show More

Read quite a bit of Burgess now, and whilst there has been lots to admire about his work, from what I'd previous read, the one thing I'd say that was lacking was any real emotional weight; warmth too. Here though, in what is his longest novel - actually felt longer than its 650 pages - it certainly carries a lot of it. This is one hell of a dense narrative, spanning nearly six decades, travelling all over the world, and containing a mass of characters. It is a serious work mostly, a hugely mature work that, whilst not about everything - literally - it feels like it kind of is. At least when it comes to those things which are most important to us. I've rarely come across a novel that peels away at human lives as deep and as rich as Burgess has done here. Roman Catholicism runs deep in this novel; very deep; which sees huge Philosophical Conversations on the nature of good and evil that crop up at various stages. The fact we get WW1 and WW2; two huge events in the 20th century, yet they feel small in the huge scope of Burgess' six decades text. Real life figures like Ezra Pound and other writers appear here and there, as do top brass in the Third Reich - the writer and narrator Kenneth Toomey - who does seem in many ways like a fictional W. Somerset Maugham - gets arrested for procuring Jewish Nobel laureate Jakob Strehler's passage out of Germany, and has to cut a deal - give a talk on Berlin Radio - to safely return home. We take in London, Paris, New York, Los Angeles, India, Morocco Italy.... It feels like the great globe-trotting magnum opus that Graham Greene never got to write. I found it to be a great book, but only because I've got four and three quarter decades under my belt; had I attempted to read this in my younger days, I highly doubt I would have fully grasped what it had to say about love, death, religion, family, friendship, human endeavour, human corruption, censorship, the struggle for homosexual rights. My heart; my understanding; just wouldn't have been in sync with that of Burgess. This is Burgess' grandfather clock of a novel which, as good as it is, doesn't hold up in todays times as well as A Clockwork Orange does, but it's still a phenomenal achievement. One thing I would say, also, is that despite Burgess following the life of Toomey's sister, Hortense, and her Italian in-laws, I feel like she deserved a novel of her own, from her perspective.
April 26,2025
... Show More
Quit halfway. Starts off very well, satirical, sharp, interesting. But from page 200 on, there are repetitions of more or less the same scenes, parties with famous contemporary writers, philosophical discussions with Carlo, etc. The story comes to a standstill and becomes boring. This novel would much improve if all these superfluous scenes would be cut out.
April 26,2025
... Show More
A hack novelist looks back on his 80 years of life, with attention given to a wide variety of literary feuds, a lengthy struggle with his sexuality, and an intimate relationship with a fictionalized pope. This is a very big book, both in size and scope; virtually every historical development, from the the slow death of Britain's empire to the growth of the 60's counter-cultural movement, is lived through and contemplated by Burgess's erudite, embittered, somewhat exasperating protagonist. It is also a book by a very smart person about very smart people, which means you're in for a lot of caddy (if witty) asides about obscure topics. I think I've started to lose my taste for both of these kinds of books in recent years, which may explain my coolness towards what is, by any debate, an admirable work of art. Burgess is very smart, and this is a genuine attempt to work through the great complexities of human existence in the modern age. But it is also an awful mixed bag – his take on fascism and post-colonial Africa being in particular rather weak, although everything having to do with the fake Pope is pretty glorious. I'm not honestly sure I could recommend the time it would take to work through this, but then again I suspect there are a lot of very clever people who would disagree with me, so take that for what it's worth.
April 26,2025
... Show More
Anthony Burgess did not intend to turn up for the Booker Prize ceremony unless he knew he had won. He didn't, but this is a very fine book and perhaps he should have done (although Rites of Passage, which did, is also good).
This is the story of two men, a novelist and a priest, who are linked by family connection, intelligence and an interest in the thorny problems of good and evil. The other members of their families are minor characters, although they add much to the richness of the story and the family dynamics are closely observed and realistic. The book is also, as a bonus as great as the original core, an idiosyncratic history of the politics and art of most of the twentieth century.
It is very funny in places, in an arch way which suits his surrogate author. An example can be found on the very first page, which he opens with a dramatic sentence, tells us it is a dramatic opening, tells us it is true and plays around with the semantics, then soon demonstrates that it is not quite true after all. Anyone not amused by the opening is unlikely to find the rest of book amusing either and may not like its irreverence.
Anyone who believes in karma will not like this book either, good actions have bad consequences and bad actions favourable consequences. I don't think it works all that well an an examination of good and evil; 'do no harm' is not a bad motto, but it is an unambitious one and I disagree with the author about the futility of trying to do good. It is much better as an examination of the concurrence and divergence between good and morality. He would be highly amused by the idea that a novel should contain the answers to the great questions of life however, and there are several sly digs at such pretensions in this one. It is a great piece of literature and that should be enough.
April 26,2025
... Show More
As a teenager, I used to make a game out of seeing how much I could compress the themes and plot of a book whenever anyone asked me “What’s it about?” Were I to play the game with Earthly Powers, I would have to reply, “A gay Catholic novelist and the Pope.” (If I really wanted to compress and confuse, “gay Catholic novelists” would have to do.) For full review, see: https://ellethinks.wordpress.com/2015...
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.