The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind

... Show More
In this book, Gregory Feist reviews and consolidates the scattered literatures on the psychology of science, then calls for the establishment of the field as a unique discipline. He offers the most comprehensive perspective yet on how science came to be possible in our species and on the important role of psychological forces in an individual’s development of scientific interest, talent, and creativity. Without a psychological perspective, Feist argues, we cannot fully understand the development of scientific thinking or scientific genius.
The author explores the major subdisciplines within psychology as well as allied areas, including biological neuroscience and developmental, cognitive, personality, and social psychology, to show how each sheds light on how scientific thinking, interest, and talent arise. He assesses which elements of scientific thinking have their origin in evolved mental mechanisms and considers how humans may have developed the highly sophisticated scientific fields we know today. In his fascinating and authoritative book, Feist deals thoughtfully with the mysteries of the human mind and convincingly argues that the creation of the psychology of science as a distinct discipline is essential to deeper understanding of human thought processes.

Community Reviews

Rating(3.8 / 5.0, 4 votes)
5 stars
1(25%)
4 stars
1(25%)
3 stars
2(50%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
4 reviews All reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
Valuable resource for PR Professionals and Futurists in Scientific and Technology Fields

If our species' concept of "tomorrow" is a puzzle, then Greg Feist's book, "The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind," is one of the corner pieces. While Feist doesn't set out with the goal of helping PR people, his work inevitably will in four ways.

1. We all recognize that the position of "scientist" has reached archetype status in our society. The public has expectations of how they think, behave, look like and view the world from a moral and religious perspective. At the same time, they typically serve as the main spokesperson when a radical breakthrough is made. These two factors intersect when it comes to managing the PR for a holy cow type of announcement. Feist takes what we intuitively and haphazardly know about this archetype and breaks it down, well, scientifically. It's invaluable fodder for PR pros to study.

2. In calling for the psychology of science to be formalized as a field of study, Feist examines the evolutionary and historical roots of the scientific mind. (Read that sentence again, because it refers to two enormous and little-studied concepts.) His conclusion? We're innately scientific creatures. This means no audience, no matter how anti-science or highest level of science education achieved, is beyond the capacity to understand a breakthrough and establish an informed opinion.

3. Understanding why and how an audience's birth order affects their openness to disruptive ideas

4. The more difficult communications challenges that "invisible" fields like quantum physics and materials science face compared to "visible" ones like those in the domain of astronomy and biology.

For PR professionals who are working to advance scientific ideas that will change humanity's future, this book is a very useful tool.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I enjoyed the book, and found it to be a wealth of information. Part One of the book I personally didn’t get a lot of enjoyment out of, but still glad I read it. After all, something being good or not isn’t solely based on some sort of ecstasy taking place while flipping through the pages. I loved Part Two quite a bit. It synced up with some of my more current interests, and in some ways felt like someone else wrote Part Two. Merit for writing ability. Bridging the gap between scientists and nonscientists in the ‘science war’ and the extreme versions of postmodernism seems like a good call in relation to what the author says his attempt was in: why ‘the time is ripe for the psychology of science,’ and ‘to demonstrate that an understanding of how science developed in our species can enlighten our understanding of how science develops in individuals.’ It felt like he didn’t quite say that though. In saying that I feel like I had to read between the lines, and bridge the gap between the two books. Anyways, interesting and enjoyable, but not commanding? Can’t think of the right word.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I'd go with Daniel Bor's 'The Ravenous Brain' or Simon Baron-Cohen's 'The Pattern Seekers' before this one. It overexplains and is a bit repetitive at times.

That being said, it' also quite informative if you slog through it.
April 17,2025
... Show More
For enthusiasts and readers of the literature on the science of science. The book reviews the state of research in the discipline of the psychology of science. What is science? What is science thought? What are the robust factors that predict science talent? The book describes the last 50 years of research on the biological, developmental, cognitive, personality and social psychology of science to answer these questions. The last half of the the book examines the origins and evolution of human scientific thinking. This field has exploded since the book was published in 2006. It's a significant addition to the long review by Zimmerman (2000). I wish there was more detailed analysis of the Dual Space Search model by Klahr and Dunbar (1988) as this seems to be our leading theory on the development of scientific reasoning. I recommend Giere's "Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach" as a compliment to this book. I would have given it 5 stars if it had more visualizations/figures but I still highly recommend this book.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.