Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
33(33%)
4 stars
31(31%)
3 stars
36(36%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
“One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit.”

Here is the definition of BULLSHIT and its distinction from an honest to god LIE by Harry Frankfurt, who claims that bullshit identifies as a very specific deformity of discourse.

His analysis prompts us to focus attention on the serious and important question of why politics, in particular, produces such torrents of the stuff. The key distinction he draws is that between the ‘bullshitter’ and the ‘liar’ is that Frankfurt’s liar aims to deceive as to the truth and does so by consciously uttering a falsehood.

I hits me how bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner’s capacity, to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are. Now, it is of course very familiar to call politicians ‘liars’; some indeed seem to assume that they constitute a strange sub-species of humanity defined by a congenital inability, to be honest.

“Our natures are, indeed, elusively insubstantial—notoriously less stable and less inherent than the nature of other things. And insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit.”

Frankfurt also established the grave danger of bullshit, and why there is so much bullshit around. Spoiler alert:- bullshit is unavoidable when people are convinced that they must have opinions about “events and conditions in all parts of the world”, about more or less anything and everything – so they speak quite extensively about things they know virtually nothing about. Frankfurt is non-committal as to whether there is more bullshit around now than before, but he maintains that there is currently a great deal.

“Bullshit is unavoidable whenever circumstances require someone to talk without knowing what he is talking about. Thus the production of bullshit is stimulated whenever a person’s obligations or opportunities to speak about some topic exceed his knowledge of the facts that are relevant to that topic. This discrepancy is common in public life, where people are frequently impelled – whether by their own propensities or by the demands of others – to speak extensively about matters of which they are to some degree ignorant.”
April 17,2025
... Show More
It would be fair to say that this brief philosophical treatise on lies that are only peripherally lies is completely full of shit. Funny in places, erroneous in others, this tiny essay put me to sleep three times while revealing nothing--not even a fair definition of terms--about its subject. Yawn.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Bullshit! Am I wrong?

Update: I read this again today after posting my above review earlier. My previous recollection is true but ammended. 1 star if this truly is an attempt at serious (or even 'pop') theory. 5 Stars if it is indeed - as I think it must be - a joke. A joke that nobody else, appropriately, seems to get. So I ask again, "Am I wrong?" All good bullshit, ironic or otherwise, leads to that question.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Stronzate!, intercalare universale ripetuto in mille e più occasioni. Ma cos'è una stronzata? Frankfurt, filosofo con particolare interesse nei campi dell'etica e del razionalismo, spiega la stronzata dal punto di vista filosofico ed il risultato è un opuscolo satirico che si legge in un attimo, regala un sorriso, a tratti forse un po' amaro, e fa capire che la filosofia è ovunque, è la base della vita un po' come la chimica. O forse sono solo tutte stronzate...
April 17,2025
... Show More
I could not finish this book. This was some smug ass bullshit right here, and I read just enough of it to appreciate the most likely intentional act of a book on bullshit serving as an example of bullshit riddled with some kernels of wisdom, wisdom I care not to sift through bullshit for.
April 17,2025
... Show More
کتابچه "در باب حرف مفت" ارائه تعریف جامعی از بولشت یا یاوه گویی بود. مهم ترین نکته ش برای من تفاوت دروغ و لاف زنی با یاوه گویی بود. کسی که حرف مفت میزنه حقیقت یا دروغ براش ترجیحی نداره بیشتر دنبال بافتن حرف ها به هم و موجه نشون دادن حرفاش و موضع خودشه. هم این کتاب و هم "دلایل عشق" هری فرانکفورت، نمونه هایی از فلسفه زیبا برام هستند، استدلال محکم که به نتیجه مشخصی میرسه.
April 17,2025
... Show More
One of the most interesting things about our culture now is the development of our language. Each of us has at some point morphed the language we have used, be it to hide what we were trying to say or soften the actual words for proper company. There are many words that have an interesting history that only a diachronic linguist would salivate over, but none as captivating to us as the word bullshit.

We have all used it, excessively at times, to describe a varied number of things. It is possibly humanity's favorite word after fuck. Harry G. Frankfurt goes the extra mile to theorize how the word developed and how it has been used over time. He claims upfront that he is no literary surveyist, but touching on several titles as well as heavily depends on the Oxford English Dictionary for reference, he makes a good fun argument on the origins of a word that is heavily used. His argument – we tend to morph our words to stop others from taking us seriously. In many times this is true, but we all know the person who is the exception to the rule. Yet, for an argument that spans 65 pages, the book itself does the same – play light on an actual ‘study’ so that it isn’t taken too seriously.

Reading more like a long essay rather than an actual book, you can read through this miniature title in one sitting. Yet, being a book about bullshit, and if it is one of the books that you have listed to read, just do so for the sake of the title and hype. It didn’t contain much that was not know, such as variations of bullshit and the like, but just compiled them between two covers.

My recommendation: read it for the sake of being able to say ‘I have read it.’ In reality the only use of this book is as a great gag gift for an English major or writer of any sort.
April 17,2025
... Show More
ترجمه قشنگی نبود
مجبور می‌شدم مجدد بخونم تا جمله رو بفهمم
April 17,2025
... Show More
If you can get through this without a dictionary, you are a professor. I just took to circling the words and sighing and looking them up in a fell swoop at the end. So much on bullshit vs. humbug, that he lost me. Also it seemed to be a meta essay, like philosophical bullshitting about bullshitting. I encourage someone to create at least three one man shows from this text. Here are some great ideas:

a) Being Harry G. Frankfurt writing this book.
b) Three different people attempting to read it a la the three bears from Goldilocks.
c) Someone on a desert island with only this book.

"Pleonastic" was the straw that broke the camel's back.
April 17,2025
... Show More
On Bullshit is an essay by philosopher Harry Frankfurt. Originally published in the journal Raritan in 1986, the essay was republished as a separate volume in 2005 and became a nonfiction bestseller, spending twenty-seven weeks on the New York Times Best Seller list.



Wiki blurbs - In the essay, Frankfurt sketches a theory of bullshit, defining the concept and analyzing its applications. In particular, Frankfurt distinguishes bullshitting from lying; while the liar deliberately makes false claims, the bullshitter is simply uninterested in the truth. Bullshitters aim primarily to impress and persuade their audiences. While liars need to know the truth, the better to conceal it, the bullshitter, interested solely in advancing his own agenda, has no use for the truth. Following from this, Frankfurt claims that "bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are."





My opinion is that this is full of hot air and vapour - much bullshit on the subject of bullshit!



http://www.amazon.com/Bullshit-Harry-...

April 17,2025
... Show More
پیش از این هم کتاب های فلسفی ترجمه شده خوانده بودم اما این یکی اندکی ثقیل تر بود برای فهم
نمیتوانم بطور قطع بگویم که کار مترجم خوب نبوده پس برای جلوگیری از زدن حرف مفت با توجه به سرشت گذرای انسان قضاوت را به خودتان واگذار میکنم
April 17,2025
... Show More
[...] Stronzate è un libro importante, che celebra l’impegno e condanna il permissivismo, la noncuranza e il lassismo di chi «cerca sempre, in un modo o nell’altro, di passarla liscia». Mentre lo leggevo pensavo ai Greci, il cui modo di fare politica, insieme etico e tecnico, si basava sul “dialogo” fra le diverse parti del corpo sociale. Essere politici, insegnano i Greci, non significa soltanto legiferare o intraprendere la carriera di politico, perché “politico” è in primo luogo chi sa far bene il suo lavoro (mica come certi editori). Se il fabbro fabbrica, il medico medica e il giudice giudica, allora anch’essi sono politici. Platone chiamava “temperanza” la virtù che fornisce la misura del proprio sapere e delle proprie competenze. Ovvero: è bene che ognuno faccia quel che sa e lasci fare ad altri quel che non sa. Pensateci su, perché questa non è una stronzata.

Per leggere la recensione completa, segui questo link:
http://www.temperamente.it/saggistica...
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.