...
Show More
I did not read this cover to cover. It contains a certain amount of belaboring the point, which when you’re treading Cioran’s thematic territory can easily become smothering. It actually feels worlds away from The Trouble With Being Born, which was written when Cioran was much older (and arguably wiser) and had honed his style to succinct aphoristic perfection delivered with a subtle levity that offsets the heavy subject matter. It’s much more tolerable to consume Cioran’s writing in these small bits, as opposed to unwieldy chunks that may clog your head and ultimately direct you to lie down in a dark room for several hours.
Reading Cioran reminds me a lot of reading Thomas Bernhard. Both writers project an uncompromising insight into the futility of life, but in their realization and acceptance of this awareness they raise it to high art, continuously boring in on their few and related themes with laser focus and elegant rhetoric. At the same time, both of these writers also saw suicide as a logical solution to the dilemma of living, and while looking with some reverence upon those who take their own lives, they simultaneously perceived a degree of weakness in themselves for not being able to take that decisive step. Hence, their steady determination to forge an alternative path for themselves and their undivided devotion to traveling it.
Basically, this path consists of writing at a distance around their own inability to commit suicide, resulting in tightly controlled concentric circles of exacting prose that illustrates what it is like to live with this inability while also being conscious of all thought that drove them to consider suicide in the first place. It is a conundrum of massive proportions, which is what makes reading these writers’ work so fascinating (at least until one reads too much of it, and then it just becomes exhausting). Thematic crossover is common between the two; Bernhard, though, chose to chiefly channel his creative energy into fiction and drama, while Cioran employed aphorisms for the most part. One could argue that without the artifice of fiction, Cioran’s naked observations are thus that much more brutal to take in.
Reading Cioran reminds me a lot of reading Thomas Bernhard. Both writers project an uncompromising insight into the futility of life, but in their realization and acceptance of this awareness they raise it to high art, continuously boring in on their few and related themes with laser focus and elegant rhetoric. At the same time, both of these writers also saw suicide as a logical solution to the dilemma of living, and while looking with some reverence upon those who take their own lives, they simultaneously perceived a degree of weakness in themselves for not being able to take that decisive step. Hence, their steady determination to forge an alternative path for themselves and their undivided devotion to traveling it.
Basically, this path consists of writing at a distance around their own inability to commit suicide, resulting in tightly controlled concentric circles of exacting prose that illustrates what it is like to live with this inability while also being conscious of all thought that drove them to consider suicide in the first place. It is a conundrum of massive proportions, which is what makes reading these writers’ work so fascinating (at least until one reads too much of it, and then it just becomes exhausting). Thematic crossover is common between the two; Bernhard, though, chose to chiefly channel his creative energy into fiction and drama, while Cioran employed aphorisms for the most part. One could argue that without the artifice of fiction, Cioran’s naked observations are thus that much more brutal to take in.