Lots of diagrams. Has a lot of loaded philosophical statements that were useful when writing a thesis. Helps to explain singularity, cosmic censorship, etc.
Full of facts and impeccable research and theory. Reading it is a bit daunting. The language is complex and not very engaging, but there is no question that the material is sound.
As much as I enjoyed the concepts that were meticulously laid out in this book; it hurt to read. The book required a lot from the reader to understand and keep up with the complex theories, unless of course you brought along your PHD in experimental physics and cosmology, which I did not.
I gave it a good college try, but was immediately swamped by the intense theoretical physics and deep mathematics involved. As a series of lectures between the two physicists as they voice disagreements about the nature of the universe, it was interesting to be a sort of fly on the wall, to see what these big brains talk about when the rest of us aren't around. On the other hand, they're discussing these things at their own level and not the level of a layman, so one might as well be a fly on the wall for the comprehension of the subject is concerned.
I gave up after failing to understand even the nature of the disagreement.
Cualquier posibilidad de lectura comprensiva de este libro queda sujeta al dominio del lector de un sinnúmero de conceptos y teoremas de la física matemática. A priori pareciera un libro que cualquier persona puede leer y entender (como Breve historia del tiempo), pero una vez que se llega a la matematización de los fenómenos y los diagramas que usan para representarlos de manera gráfica, todo se vuelve mucho más confuso. De todos modos la lectura me ayudó a aclarar algunos conceptos básicos del origen y fin del universo y de la mecánica cuántica.