Lawrence Durrell's Ambitious Alexandria Quartet
Lawrence Durrell set out to achieve a remarkable feat with his Alexandria Quartet. The first three volumes presented the same events from different perspectives, and the fourth, Clea, was to extend the story forward in time, analogous to the dimensions of space and time. However, Clea fails to meet the high expectations set by the previous volumes.
The Return to the Author's Voice
After the clarity of the third-person narrative in Mountolive, it is a shock to return to the author's own voice, or rather that of Darley. While Durrell still writes beautifully, the cloying atmosphere and verbal navel-gazing that were thought to be in the past return. The encounter between Darley and Justine, with its nauseating aroma of spilled perfume, is a prime example of this.
The Problem of Catching Up
The promise to carry the story forward in time mostly takes the form of "Whatever happened to so-and-so?" This feels like listening in on someone else's tea-party conversation, with little new happening in the book. The oblique handling of the catching-up, through third-person stories and long confessional letters, further distances the reader from the characters.
The Symbolism of Incest
Durrell's exploration of love in the Quartet includes a mention of incest, which is picked up again in Clea. This serves as a perfect symbol for a book that is itself incestuous, with the author manipulating his characters and the story lacking in authenticity. The thirty-page passage of one writer dissecting another, both alter-egos of the author, is a prime example of this navel-gazing.
The Arbitrary Resolutions
The resolutions in Clea feel arbitrary, with the central relationship between Darley and Clea coming about too easily and later encountering difficulty without explanation. The author seems to be more interested in playing games with his characters than in telling a compelling story. It is a pity that this great undertaking has fallen so short of its promise.