Hamlet... the confused human between thought and action.
After the murder of his father, he hesitates between his emotional nature and his philosophical thinking.
In a vain attempt to extend the period of inaction and delay revenge.
His feigning and showing madness is part of the suffering and psychological and moral pressures.
And finally, Shakespeare chooses action as a just and visible force to decide matters in reality.
And revenge here is part of justice.
Hamlet is a complex and tormented character, the confused human who finds himself caught between the realms of thought and action. After the tragic murder of his father, he is plunged into a state of deep turmoil. He vacillates between his passionate and emotional nature, which yearns for immediate revenge, and his philosophical thinking, which makes him question the morality and consequences of such an act. In a seemingly futile attempt to prolong the period of inaction and delay the act of revenge, he resorts to feigning madness. This feigning is not just a ploy but also a manifestation of the intense suffering and the overwhelming psychological and moral pressures he is experiencing. However, as the story unfolds, Shakespeare ultimately presents action as a just and visible force that has the power to decide matters in the real world. In this context, revenge is seen as an integral part of justice, a means to right the wrongs that have been committed.
Updated review February 2017:
This is my third encounter with Hamlet, and like a fine wine that matures with time, my appreciation for it has deepened. I revisited the same copy that has been sitting on my shelf for years, with one page of notes on the left and the play on the right. This time around, I was able to breeze through most of the play without relying too much on the notes, which was an amazing feeling. I only had to glance over to decipher the meaning of some archaic words, and for the first time, I truly understood the story. It took me three attempts, with a little help from my trusty annotated copy, but I finally got it.
The beauty of Hamlet is simply captivating. I fell in love with it all over again. It seamlessly weaves through various genres, keeping me on the edge of my seat and turning the pages with anticipation. I read it slowly, savoring every word and phrase, breathing in the language and allowing myself to be immersed in the world of Shakespeare. At times, I even read it out loud, much to the annoyance of my wife who eventually made me quiet down. I tried to persuade her to play the female parts, but she wasn't quite into it. I guess her options were limited with only the roles of the Queen and Ophelia. Nevertheless, reading it slowly didn't make the experience any less enjoyable. In fact, it felt like time flew by as I became completely engrossed in the story.
Hamlet is a complex and multi-faceted character, and his journey through a gamut of emotions is truly a sight to behold. His monologues are nothing short of masterpieces of poetry. I wish I could commit them to memory and recite them randomly on a street corner or while shopping for groceries, much to the bewilderment of those around me. The famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy is just one of the many highlights of the play. I also loved the moments when the action went haywire and the plot took unexpected turns. The ending was both crazy and awesome, leaving me with a sense of awe and wonder. In short, Hamlet is a daggum fantastic story that everyone should give a try. If you're intimidated by the language, find a copy that simplifies and explains it. Trust me, it's worth it.
I've got Macbeth waiting on my shelf, and I think it might be time to dust it off and take another plunge into the world of Shakespeare. However, I need to be in the right mindset. I can't just be reading Shakespeare all the time. I have other "real" books to read too, with words that I can understand without the need for a dictionary. But for now, I'm content with my newfound love for Hamlet and look forward to exploring more of Shakespeare's works in the future.
Previous review:
I once asked a friend if he liked Shakespeare, and his response was, "I don't dislike Shakespeare." That's exactly how I feel about him too. In high school, I was forced to read Romeo and Juliet and Julius Caesar, and my thoughts on Shakespeare haven't changed much in the past 15 years. His stories are undoubtedly great, but the fact that they were written so long ago makes them a bit of a chore to read at times. I have the utmost respect for the guy, but he will never be my first choice (or second or third) when I'm looking for something new and exciting to read.
That being said, Hamlet was my favorite play to read through this time. Maybe it's because I'm older and more mature, or perhaps I'm just more open to the beauty of Shakespeare's language. Whatever the reason, I found the story to be truly captivating and was surprised by how many lines I recognized from my general knowledge of culture. Would I have ever read this if it wasn't for the group read in preparation for Infinite Jest? Probably not. But I'm glad I did, and it was a worthwhile experience that has given me a newfound appreciation for Shakespeare.
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark, and I, like Oscar the Grouch, find a strange allure in it. I have a profound love for Hamlet. He simply can't hold his tongue, is a moody bisexual to the extreme, and becomes all philosophical while desiring everyone to think he's losing his mind, thereby triggering a self-fulfilling prophecy of his mental health actually spiraling. Maybe I relate a bit too closely. But this play is truly remarkable and has endured as a classic for a reason, even if its characters don't survive the play. Additionally, who doesn't have a penchant for a good revenge story? Especially one that has become a staple plot and has led to great retellings such as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead by Tom Stoppard or even The Lion King, and has so many elements that would later be revitalized as gothic tropes in literature and film.
This entire play is steeped in the interrogative mood, situating us in constant contemplation of 'what a piece of work is man' through a plethora of philosophical inquiries that range from sophism to existentialism. Of course, 'to be or not to be'—one of the most quoted and recognizable lines of the play—is often regarded as probing existentialist ideas long before Kierkegaard and Sartre would拿起 their pens. It opens the play up as an investigation of identity and purpose that is, arguably, very existentially thematic. Much of the play asks 'what is a man' but is also Hamlet asking "who am I?" of himself as he schemes and stumbles through the 'rotten' state of the world. He also seems to express ideas of relativism central to the Sophists in lines such as 'there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so', and this moral relativism, coupled with a thirst for revenge, adds a rather edgy and engaging texture to the narrative as it hurtles forward into destruction and death.
It is also a highly coveted role on the stage, and there is an incredible list of people who have played Hamlet. Peter O'Toole, Laurence Olivier, Ralph Fiennes, Richard Burton, David Tennant, Kenneth Branagh, Christopher Plummer, Daniel Day-Lewis, Alan Cumming, and many more. Even Ian McKellen played him in a recent age-blind cast production. Who wouldn't want to play Hamlet? But Ophelia as well, one of the more interesting characters who has certainly had a life of her own across literature.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet lives on, like many of his plays, for having a rather universal quality that appeals to the times regardless of when in history it is revisited or performed. Themes of being trapped by circumstance, themes of betrayal, themes of the in-fighting of the ruling class dooming a nation under them, and themes of struggling with identity continue to trouble people in every era, and Hamlet always offers an avenue for confronting these ideas. It is a fantastic play that stands out even in Shakespeare’s impressive canon of works.
I feel like an heretic saying this, for since the first time I read this play I didn't like Hamlet much. And after this reread, it's still true. It's the story that fails to enthrall me, not so the characters, not the prose, not the stagecraft either.
The characters in Hamlet are indeed complex and well-developed. Hamlet himself is a tortured soul, filled with indecision and self-doubt. Ophelia is a tragic figure, driven to madness by the actions of those around her. The prose is beautiful, filled with vivid imagery and powerful language. And the stagecraft, if done well, can bring the play to life in a truly remarkable way.
However, for some reason, the story just doesn't grab me. Maybe it's because it's so well-known that I already know what's going to happen. Maybe it's because the themes of revenge and madness are a bit too dark for my taste. Or maybe it's just that I'm not in the right frame of mind to appreciate it. Whatever the reason, I can't help but feel that Hamlet is not the masterpiece that others seem to think it is.