It is not easy to read. Literally speaking: the alternation among three grammatical persons, fragmentation and temporal disorder, the stream of consciousness/interior monologue of the most cryptic order (as in the chapter of the disabled boy in The Sound and the Fury, but almost the entire novel). The poetic impact is undeniable. On the one hand, the chaotic and sensory style makes us feel and suffer firsthand what is described. On the other hand, it does not stop stringing together lucid messages and scathing critiques.
The complex narrative structure and the use of experimental literary techniques in this work pose a great challenge to the reader. However, it is precisely through this difficult reading experience that we can gain a deeper understanding of the author's profound thoughts and unique artistic expression. The alternation of different narrative perspectives and the fragmentation of the story make the reader constantly jump between different time and space, which requires us to have a high degree of concentration and imagination to piece together the complete picture of the story.
Although the reading process may be difficult, the rewards are also great. The scathing critiques and lucid messages hidden in the chaotic narrative make us reflect on various aspects of society and human nature. This work is not only a literary masterpiece but also a mirror that reflects the real world.
A historical fiction novel with a plot that I find quite believable, written in a chaotic yet very original way, in three time periods and with a non-linear temporal structure that somehow gains some relevance with the change of power and the arrival of new "caudillos".
The story focuses on Artemio Cruz who, on his deathbed, recalls how he went from being an official of the Mexican Revolution to a powerful entrepreneur and who sold his ideals in order to acquire power and fortune. But it's not just about that, it also touches on themes such as betrayal, unrequited loves, and historical themes of revolutionary and post-revolutionary Mexico. I think the novel is very well researched and the atmosphere the author gives it seems very good to me, although he abuses Mexicanidad a bit in that need to emphasize that it is a Mexican novel set in Mexico.
Regarding the way it is written, I think it is both its greatest virtue and weakness. What Fuentes achieves in this novel seems extraordinary to me, and that is that the story of a character (Artemio Cruz) takes on three different shades without losing continuity, which he achieves by changing time periods and creating a non-linear structure, mixing the present with the past almost simultaneously. This structure can be quite confusing and sometimes I lost the thread of the story, but once hooked, I found it natural to read.
I don't know if it's because I've recently read many essays and few novels, but I really enjoyed this book, and it's hard for me not to compare it with the current situation of the country, where the "change" of regime brings the misfortune of old oligarchs and elevates new caudillos, and if this novel leaves us something about that aspect, it's that revolutions are lost not in battles, but when ideals are corrupted. I think it's worth reading, even now that it has been written for more than fifty years.