We are all of us not what we appear to be according to the conditions for which alone we have consciousness and words, and consequently praise and blame. We fail to recognise ourselves after these coarse outbursts which are known to ourselves alone, we draw conclusions from data where the exceptions prove stronger than the rules; we misinterpret ourselves in reading our own ego's pronouncements, which appeared to be so clear. But our opinion of ourselves, this so-called ego which we have arrived at by this wrong method, contributes henceforth to form our character and destiny.
Nietzsche, unlike other philosophers, had an artistic way of philosophizing, making his writings poetic. Even those who don't understand him can be inspired. The Dawn of Day is one of his less popular books, but I loved it as much as his others. I felt he criticized Christianity more in this book. Every prose was powerful and could turn our minds upside down, even if some were wrong. In this book, Nietzsche expounds on radical theories, like the harmful nature of Christianity and how the drive for power affects human behavior.
Acting the Truth.—Many a man is truthful, not because he would be ashamed to exhibit hypocritical feelings, but because he would not succeed very well in inducing others to believe in his hypocrisy. In a word, he has no confidence in his talent as an actor, and therefore prefers honestly to act the truth.
When Nietzsche titled his book The Dawn of Day, it wasn't just a fancy title. It represents the dawn of his own philosophy. Before, he was influenced by Schopenhauer, Wagner, and maybe Comte. Human, all-too-Human was a transition. After leaving Bayreuth, Nietzsche was trying to be independent and find his own philosophy. The Dawn of Day, written in 1881 in a Genoese spring, is the start of the new Nietzsche. He said in his autobiography that with this book, he opened his campaign against morality.
Hierarchy.—First and foremost, there are the superficial thinkers, and secondly the profound thinkers—such as dive into the depths of a thing,—thirdly, the thorough thinkers, who get to the bottom of a thing—which is of much greater importance than merely diving into its depths,—and, finally, those who leap head foremost into the marsh: though this must not be looked upon as indicating either depth or thoroughness! these are the lovers of obscurity.