Kripke's book delves into a crucial aspect of Wittgenstein's thought. Wittgenstein's re-understanding of "meaning" is a central theme. It involves a shift from a representationalist view to a more pragmatic one. Kripke claims that Wittgenstein's treatments of sensations and mathematics are related to a general argument about rule-following. The paradox of rule-following is described using addition as an example. A skeptic challenges the idea that the correct answer is 125, suggesting it could be 5. The appeal to the "plus" rule is undermined as past behavior is consistent with both the "plus" and "quus" rules. The claim to know the correct answer without justification leads to a paradox. Wittgenstein considers various responses, including the idea of a special mental state or sensation of "meaning" a rule. Kripke presents Wittgenstein's resolution as a "skeptical response" that replaces truth conditions with pragmatic justification. This new account of language and meaning emphasizes the social context and community agreement. Kripke's interpretation has implications for understanding what it means to follow a rule and learn arithmetic. It also raises questions about the applicability of this pragmatic re-understanding to all cases of "meaning" and its relationship to the "fact" conception of truth. The examples of addition and movie judgments highlight the differences and similarities between rule-governed and less determined activities. The question of whether there is a fact distinguishing the two cases remains unanswered, but it shows the draw of both pragmatism and the idea of a fact of the matter. Overall, Kripke's work provides a thought-provoking exploration of Wittgenstein's ideas and their implications.

It was very bright and good.

For me, it was almost the first time that I followed such a complete philosophical argument from beginning to end.

This experience was truly eye-opening and intellectually stimulating.

I found myself completely engaged in the process of understanding the logical progression and the profound ideas being presented.

The clarity and coherence of the argument made it accessible and enjoyable to explore.

As I delved deeper into it, I began to see the connections and implications that I had not initially considered.

It was like uncovering a hidden treasure trove of knowledge and wisdom.

This encounter with philosophical reasoning has left a lasting impression on me and has sparked my curiosity to explore more in this fascinating field.

I look forward to further adventures in the realm of philosophy and the insights that I will gain along the way.

It took me a considerable amount of time to overcome the rather odd reading of Wittgenstein. At first, his ideas seemed quite perplexing and difficult to grasp. However, as I delved deeper into his work and reached the postscript, something remarkable happened.

Suddenly, everything started to click into place, and I found myself fully onboard with his analysis. It was as if a light had been switched on, and I could now see the profound insights and significance of his thoughts.

The postscript served as a crucial turning point for me, clarifying many of the earlier ambiguities and presenting a more comprehensive and coherent picture.

I realized that Wittgenstein's unique approach to philosophy had much to offer, and I became eager to explore further and understand the implications of his ideas.

This experience taught me the importance of perseverance and an open mind when approaching complex and unfamiliar works of philosophy.

A book so brilliant, it makes you feel brilliant too. It's not just an ordinary piece of literature; it's a masterpiece that has the power to transform your perspective and ignite your imagination. As you turn the pages, you'll find yourself drawn into a world of captivating stories, profound ideas, and unforgettable characters. The author's words are like a magic wand, weaving a spell that leaves you spellbound and eager for more.

Each sentence is carefully crafted, every paragraph flows seamlessly, and the overall structure of the book is a work of art in itself. It challenges you to think deeply, to question your assumptions, and to see the world from a different angle. It's a book that you'll want to read again and again, uncovering new insights and treasures with each reading.

Whether you're a book lover or just looking for something to inspire you, this book is a must-read. It will make you feel brilliant, not just because of its own brilliance, but because it has the power to bring out the best in you.

Kripke has crafted a truly remarkable piece of philosophical work.

The book is neatly divided into three distinct sections. The first section delves into the rule-following paradox, which presents a fascinating and complex conundrum that challenges our understanding of how we follow rules.

The second section offers a proposed solution to this paradox, which is both thought-provoking and intellectually stimulating.

The final section then explores further considerations on other minds, adding yet another layer of depth and complexity to the overall work.

As a work of scholarship, I found myself surprisingly persuaded that Kripke is, for the most part, presenting Wittgenstein's actual views. This has left me with a sense of curiosity, eager to see what other Wittgenstein scholars will make of this work.

Will they agree with Kripke's interpretations? Or will they offer alternative perspectives and critiques? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: Kripke's work is sure to spark lively debate and discussion among philosophers for years to come.

Kripke's interpretation of Wittgenstein's response to skepticism is both misguided and very interesting.

On one hand, it offers a novel and thought-provoking perspective on Wittgenstein's complex ideas. Kripke argues that Wittgenstein presents a skeptical paradox and then offers a "skeptical solution" to it. This approach has generated a great deal of discussion and debate among philosophers.

However, on the other hand, many critics have pointed out that Kripke's interpretation may not accurately capture Wittgenstein's true intentions. Some have argued that Kripke's reading is too narrow or that he misinterprets certain key passages in Wittgenstein's work.

Despite these criticisms, Kripke's interpretation remains an important and influential contribution to the study of Wittgenstein and skepticism. It has forced philosophers to reexamine their own assumptions about language, meaning, and knowledge, and has inspired new lines of research and inquiry.

Skaityti kaip Kripkės projektuojamas Wittgenstein'iškas skeptikas įvairiais būdais sako „68+57=/=125“ ir „ar tikrai [+] reiškia sudėtis?“ 6tą ryto buvo patirtis (didžiausia klaida mano gyvenime).

This experience on the 6th morning was truly astonishing. The Wittgensteinian skeptic, as projected by Kripke, challenges our fundamental understanding of arithmetic in various ways. By stating that "68 + 57 =/= 125" and questioning whether the symbol [+] really means addition, it forces us to reexamine our assumptions.

It makes us wonder if there could be other possible interpretations or hidden meanings behind the seemingly simple operations we take for granted. This kind of skeptical thinking can have a profound impact on our understanding of mathematics and logic, and it reminds us that there is always more to discover and explore in the world of ideas.

De mi tfg.

My TFG (Trabajo Final de Grado or Final Degree Project) is an important milestone in my academic journey. It represents the culmination of years of study and research.

I have dedicated a significant amount of time and effort to this project, carefully choosing a topic that interests me and that I believe has the potential to make a valuable contribution to my field of study.

Throughout the process, I have faced numerous challenges and obstacles, but I have persevered and overcome them with determination and hard work.

I have conducted extensive research, gathering and analyzing data from a variety of sources. I have also engaged in discussions and consultations with my supervisors and peers, who have provided me with valuable feedback and guidance.

As I near the completion of my TFG, I am filled with a sense of pride and accomplishment. I know that this project has not only enhanced my knowledge and skills but has also prepared me for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in my future career.

It's a truly perfect work of philosophy.

It is concise, presenting its ideas in a clear and straightforward manner.

Moreover, the arguments put forward are well-structured and highly convincing.

Before delving into this reading, the Philosophical Investigations initially appeared to be a mere series of related remarks regarding meaning.

However, as I progressed through it, I began to see that these remarks were gradually building up to something much more profound.

This realization unified the entire work for me and made it significantly easier to understand and appreciate.

It was as if a light had been shone on the complex web of thoughts, revealing the underlying coherence and purpose.

Now, I have a newfound respect for this masterpiece of philosophy and the insights it offers.

A great book on philosophy has emerged.

Put very baldly, it posits that no word in our language can ever have a consistent meaning which can predict future use. This implies that the only way we can define language is as something accepted by a group. Basically (although Kripke doesn't use the phrase), it is a social construct, a "language-game" without any meaning outside of the group dynamic.

This, a major reversal of the Tractatus, is from the pragmatist late-Wittgenstein work Philosophical Investigations - although it is more accurately the basis of the independent beast known as 'Kripkenstein'.

However, I do not handle philosophical jargon well. Fortunately, this book is clear, lively and enjoyable. The footnotes can occasionally get a bit gnarly, though. It presents complex philosophical ideas in a way that is accessible and engaging, making it a great read for both those new to philosophy and those with more experience.

The author's ability to explain difficult concepts with clarity and simplicity is truly remarkable. Overall, this is a book that I would highly recommend to anyone interested in philosophy or language.

This is an excellent book!!!

It captivates the reader from the very first page. The story is engaging and filled with interesting characters and plot twists. The author's writing style is vivid and descriptive, making it easy for the reader to imagine the scenes and events as they unfold.

The book also explores deep and meaningful themes, such as love, loss, and redemption. It makes the reader think and reflect on their own life and values.

Overall, this is a must-read book for anyone who loves a good story. It will keep you entertained and engaged from beginning to end, and leave you with a sense of satisfaction and a new perspective on life.

I think it is a very good book for getting into the debate about following rules. Indeed, the thing with the footnotes that are two or three pages long is an abuse.

This book provides a great starting point for those who are interested in exploring the concept of rule-following. It presents different perspectives and arguments, which can help readers to form their own opinions.

However, the excessive length of the footnotes can be a bit overwhelming. It might be better if the author could condense the information in the footnotes or present it in a more accessible way.

Overall, despite this drawback, the book is still worth reading for anyone who wants to gain a deeper understanding of the importance and challenges of following rules in various aspects of life.