Robert Langdon #2

The da Vinci Code

... Show More
Alternate covers for 9780307277671 can be found:
The da Vinci Code, The da Vinci Code, The da Vinci Code, and The da Vinci Code

While in Paris on business, Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon receives an urgent late-night phone call: the elderly curator of the Louvre has been murdered inside the museum. Near the body, police have found a baffling cipher. While working to solve the enigmatic riddle, Langdon is stunned to discover it leads to a trail of clues hidden in the works of Da Vinci -- clues visible for all to see -- yet ingeniously disguised by the painter.

Langdon joins forces with a gifted French cryptologist, Sophie Neveu, and learns the late curator was involved in the Priory of Sion -- an actual secret society whose members included Sir Isaac Newton, Botticelli, Victor Hugo, and Da Vinci, among others.

In a breathless race through Paris, London, and beyond, Langdon and Neveu match wits with a faceless powerbroker who seems to anticipate their every move. Unless Langdon and Neveu can decipher the labyrinthine puzzle in time, the Priory's ancient secret -- and an explosive historical truth -- will be lost forever.

The Da Vinci Code heralds the arrival of a new breed of lightning-paced, intelligent thriller utterly unpredictable right up to its stunning conclusion.

489 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,2003

This edition

Format
489 pages, Paperback
Published
March 28, 2006 by Anchor
ISBN
ASIN
B0DVH1BKQC
Language
English
Characters More characters
  • Sophie Neveu

    Sophie Neveu

    Sophie Neveu is the granddaughter of Louvre curator Jacques Saunière. She is a French National Police cryptographer, who studied at the Royal Holloway, University of London Information Security Group.She was raised by her grandfather from an early age, af...

  • Robert Langdon

    Robert Langdon

    Eminent Harvard Professor of religious iconology and symbology. Avid water polo player....

  • Sir Leigh Teabing
  • Silas (The Da Vinci Code)
  • Bezu Fache
  • Jerome Collet

About the author

... Show More
Dan Brown is the author of numerous #1 bestselling novels, including The Da Vinci Code, which has become one of the best selling novels of all time as well as the subject of intellectual debate among readers and scholars. Brown's novels are published in 56 languages around the world with over 200 million copies in print.

In 2005, Brown was named one of the 100 Most Influential People in the World by TIME Magazine, whose editors credited him with “keeping the publishing industry afloat; renewed interest in Leonardo da Vinci and early Christian history; spiking tourism to Paris and Rome; a growing membership in secret societies; the ire of Cardinals in Rome; eight books denying the claims of the novel and seven guides to read along with it; a flood of historical thrillers; and a major motion picture franchise.”

The son of a mathematics teacher and a church organist, Brown was raised on a prep school campus where he developed a fascination with the paradoxical interplay between science and religion. These themes eventually formed the backdrop for his books. He is a graduate of Amherst College and Phillips Exeter Academy, where he later returned to teach English before focusing his attention full time to writing. He lives in New England with his yellow lab, Winston.

Brown's latest novel, Origin, explores two of the fundamental questions of humankind: Where do we come from? Where are we going?

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 98 votes)
5 stars
32(33%)
4 stars
33(34%)
3 stars
33(34%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
98 reviews All reviews
March 26,2025
... Show More
Caveat Academics!!!
I won't belabor the obvious, as it's been done quite well by other reviewers, but I just couldn't stand not to add my own "hear hear!" to the fray. If you're going to create a character who is an expert, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE make sure you check your facts! Whoever edited this drivel ought to be sewn in a sack with a rabid raccoon and flung into Lake Michigan.

And just as a matter of good taste - your expert should not be an expert in everything under the sun. That's one of the hallmarks of poor writing.

Even if I were not a practicing pagan, I would find it stretching credibility that every single item the characters run across is a symbol of goddess worship. Five pointed star? Goddess worship. Chalice? Goddess worship. Porcelain toilet bowl? Goddess worship. Pilot ball point pen? Goddess worship. You get the general idea. Not only is every item part of the mythology of the divine feminine, but every number is also part of the divine feminine. Hello? Is a cigar NEVER just a cigar?

And some of the claims of symbolism are just plain wrong, as the editor would have found out if he'd bothered to do some fact checking. Remember those military chevrons that, because of the way they were pointed, represented the female divine and those poor slobs of soldiers had been running around all these countless centuries with goddess symbols flaunted on their uniforms without knowing it? The only problem with that premise is that the chevrons facing in their current direction is relatively recent - according to my military historian husband, they faced the OPPOSITE direction for quite some time before being reversed (for what reason, I have no idea...unless the generals all got together and decided they didn't have quite enough goddess symbols on their uniforms and needed it fixed post haste).

My theology professor ended up traveling around the country giving talks about this book to thousands of interested people. He loves the book if only because he's now giving pretty much the same information that he used to give to dozing freshman and sophomores to packed theaters of interested listeners. He tells a story about being somewhere in southern Ohio and making a joking remark about the celice being something that all Catholics wore and how now the secret was out, and there was a lady in the back row who elbowed her husband and said "See? I told you so!" The increased interest in history is about the only positive thing that's come out of this book. Honestly, you don't need to make anything up about the Catholic church to point out that it's been the source of some horrible things.

I could go on about the poor research and editing in this book, but others have done a pretty thorough job of finding the problems with it.

If you want a decent page turner, go for it. If you want something well researched and accurate, give this one a big ol' pass.



March 26,2025
... Show More
The curator of the Louvre is murdered but manages to leave several clues for Robert Langdon and cryptologist Sophie Neveu to follow, and hopefully, to save an age old religious secret from falling into the wrong hands. Interesting enough premise, but not very satisfying as a thriller . It just doesn’t thrill. It’s maybe one of those rare occasions where I would recommend the movie.

March 26,2025
... Show More
داستان جذابی داشت و ترجمه واقعا عالی بود. دارم فکر میکنم اگر با یه ترجمه بد میخوندمش شاید اصلا به آخرش نمیرسیدم چون قرار نبود چیزی متوجه بشم. مترجم پاورقیهای زیادی داره و درباره اشخاص، اماکن و... توضیح داده که اتفاقا دونستنشون برام جالب بود.

داستان از این قراره: یه قتل توی موزه لوور اتفاق میفته. رئیس موزه کشته شده و پلیس میاد و صحنه جرم رو بررسی میکنه و یه اسم اونجاست؛ رابرت لنگدان، استاد نمادشناسی. وقتی رابرت میاد اونجا متوجه میشه که میخوان قتل رو بندازن گردنش چون پلیسا حدس زدن مقتول اسم قاتلش رو در لحظات آخر نوشته اما قضیه چیز دیگه‌ای هست. اینو سوفی نوو یکی از ماموران حاضر در موزه هم میدونه پس سعی میکنه رابرت لنگدان رو نجات بده تا راز قتل رئیس موزه لوور مشخص بشه.

کتاب پر از رمز و رمزنگاریه. همینطور نمادها و داستانهای جالبی از گذشته میگه که من نمیدونستم. یکم هم از آثار داوینچی یاد گرفتم. درکل شبیه به یه کلاس درس اما از نوع جذابش بود.
دو نکته منفی برای من وجود داشت. اول اینکه شخصیت پردازی ضعیف بود. ما چیز زیادی از افکار و زندگی شخصیت‌ها نمیخوندیم. من دوست دارم بیشتر شخصیت اصلی رو بشناسم تا درگیر رفتارها و انتخابهاش بشم.
دوم اینکه چیز زیادی برای حدس زدن وجود نداشت. خود نویسنده همه جوابهارو میداد چون معماها به رازهای تاریخی و نمادشناسی و رمزگشایی ربط داشتن که برای کسی که اطلاعاتی به این گستردگی نداره قابل حدس نبودن.
با این حال بنظرم کتاب خوبی بود و پیشنهادش میکنم.
March 26,2025
... Show More
No, I am not!

No, I am not going to write a review about this piece of nonsense just because I had yet ANOTHER of those incredibly annoying conversations (in a bookstore to top it off!).

No, I am not.

Oh, for goodness sake!

It is NOT a great book to broaden your cultural horizons, and whatever the humbug mentioned on Leonardo - it is NOT equivalent to reading a book researched by a REAL art historian, - which is something entirely different from a blind-folded arrogant gold digging bestseller author.

It is not a well-written, exciting thriller.

It is Brown in Wonderland, minus the humour, the wit and the beautiful language of the Wonderland Alice visited, and minus the credible plot.

It is not something a bookworm like me HAS to read! Okay? Once and for all, no!

"Lisa, you as a book lover and art historian must love Dan Brown!"

No! Period. I don't. I read three ... THREE! ... of his arrogant idiocies posing as novels. I DON'T love him.

It makes me furious to get the question, over and over:

"How much of what he discovered on Leonardo is true?"

I did not write a review, I hope. It would have been a bad one. Let's forget it.
March 26,2025
... Show More
The novel that thrust Professor Robert Langdon, a Harvard symbolist into the public eye.

A great puzzle murder mystery as curator of the Louvre Jacques Saunière is found dead, he’s body posed just like Da Vinci’s - Vitruvian Man.
It’s a race against time as Langdon is accused of the murder, the story jumps around at a breathtaking speed with art and history being integral to solving the murder.

It’s a fun thrill ride that instantly had me hooked.
March 26,2025
... Show More
ماذا أقول...ماذا أقول؟؟
إبدااااااااااااااااااااع
March 26,2025
... Show More
Alternate history, uchronias, and indirect criticism of faith and ideology combined into one of the most successful thriller series of all time.

The separate parts were already there
Everything was already on the table, many authors had dealt with the different ideas Brown is mixing together, and finding and recombining conspiracy theories isn´t that complicated. It´s the mix of different topics that interest many people stirred together that make it entertaining for the ones who like art or thrillers, for atheists and religious people, for the ones interested in plot or characterization, it´s just difficult to find someone who would immediately say that she/he isn´t interested in one of the plot vehicles.

Uchronia, dystopia, or big history?
It doesn´t just relativizes general history, but religious and political history in a way that makes it a prime example of the fact that history and holy texts are written by the winners. Widening the range, questioning the status quo, and making people skeptical regarding omniscience, commandments, and whatever is something of huge importance. Brown did more than Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens combined and multiplied could have done in centuries by reaching so many people and making them think about the legitimation of any kind of belief.

Religious fan fiction
Imagine many people would start writing fanfiction like that about different religious texts, expanding universes with new and alternative prophets, letting the whole thing collapse into a parody of itself within years.

Hard vs soft science
I tend to equate religious, economic, and political science texts for the simple reason that, as soon as there is one more truth, or in hard science, formulas, and equations, the others or even the own one must the wrong. The more open criticism and sarcastic to profound interpretations of all those one hit wonders are made by sophisticated, young people, the less power all of those charlatanries can generate in their stupid quest towards the one and only variation of reality they want to establish.

Blasphemy in a  Why can´t JC have a daughter, what´s your problem dudes? It´s so ridiculous, if any prophet would be a woman or, gosh, a lesbian (or even a gay male prophet), they would of course completely freak out even more.

Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...

A wiki walk can be as refreshing to the mind as a walk through nature in this completely overrated real life outside books:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...
Sakrileg ist der Titel der 2004 erschienenen Übersetzung eines
March 26,2025
... Show More
This book, this book, this hopelessly stupid book. It's okay. It's something to read. It's not the worst book I've ever read. I did get through the whole thing. But, simply, it is not THAT good.
I will now proceed to quote from another reviewer, Mer, who has said exactly what I have been saying for years -albeit she does it far more eloquently than I:

"The characters are weakly drawn. The dialog is excruciating. The research is shoddy and self-serving at best. The plot, no matter how open-minded you are, is beyond ludicrous.(...)
"I'm all for fictional subversion of the dominant Catholic paradigm, but only if the subverter knows what the hell they're talking about. Brown DOESN'T. He's all "la la la, connect the dots" but the picture he comes up with is awkward and unconvincing.
"The DaVinci Code is a dead easy, nay, downright lazy read, and yet droves of people are patting themselves on the back for having read and *gasp* actually understood it. Like this is some spectacular achievement? WHY? What, because the slipcover describes it as "erudite"? Are you fucking kidding me?
"Don't believe the hype, kids. You are profoundly more intelligent than this holiday page-turner gives you credit for."

So, so, so true. And if you've read "Angels and Demons" you'll see that it starts out precisely the way "Code" does, nearly word-for-word, even using the dreaded looks-at-himself-in-the-mirror character description cop-out.

This, and the man (the author, that is) looks like a troll. A self-aggrandizing oh-so-clever stuffed pompous troll. All he did was capitalize on a theme that's been out there for years, insist that it was all 100% factual, and put a pretty red cover on it. He's created a sensation and got himself a movie, I'll give him that. I bet he swims around in vaults of money every night cackling at his deluded readership.

But the book is just NOT THAT GOOD. Get over it. Want something historical? Read Anya Seton. Something thrilling? Read Thomas Tryon. Richard North Patterson. Jon Krakauer. Croikey, even Clive Cussler! Anything but that damn Dan Brown.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.