Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 98 votes)
5 stars
32(33%)
4 stars
33(34%)
3 stars
33(34%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
98 reviews
March 26,2025
... Show More
Caveat Academics!!!
I won't belabor the obvious, as it's been done quite well by other reviewers, but I just couldn't stand not to add my own "hear hear!" to the fray. If you're going to create a character who is an expert, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE make sure you check your facts! Whoever edited this drivel ought to be sewn in a sack with a rabid raccoon and flung into Lake Michigan.

And just as a matter of good taste - your expert should not be an expert in everything under the sun. That's one of the hallmarks of poor writing.

Even if I were not a practicing pagan, I would find it stretching credibility that every single item the characters run across is a symbol of goddess worship. Five pointed star? Goddess worship. Chalice? Goddess worship. Porcelain toilet bowl? Goddess worship. Pilot ball point pen? Goddess worship. You get the general idea. Not only is every item part of the mythology of the divine feminine, but every number is also part of the divine feminine. Hello? Is a cigar NEVER just a cigar?

And some of the claims of symbolism are just plain wrong, as the editor would have found out if he'd bothered to do some fact checking. Remember those military chevrons that, because of the way they were pointed, represented the female divine and those poor slobs of soldiers had been running around all these countless centuries with goddess symbols flaunted on their uniforms without knowing it? The only problem with that premise is that the chevrons facing in their current direction is relatively recent - according to my military historian husband, they faced the OPPOSITE direction for quite some time before being reversed (for what reason, I have no idea...unless the generals all got together and decided they didn't have quite enough goddess symbols on their uniforms and needed it fixed post haste).

My theology professor ended up traveling around the country giving talks about this book to thousands of interested people. He loves the book if only because he's now giving pretty much the same information that he used to give to dozing freshman and sophomores to packed theaters of interested listeners. He tells a story about being somewhere in southern Ohio and making a joking remark about the celice being something that all Catholics wore and how now the secret was out, and there was a lady in the back row who elbowed her husband and said "See? I told you so!" The increased interest in history is about the only positive thing that's come out of this book. Honestly, you don't need to make anything up about the Catholic church to point out that it's been the source of some horrible things.

I could go on about the poor research and editing in this book, but others have done a pretty thorough job of finding the problems with it.

If you want a decent page turner, go for it. If you want something well researched and accurate, give this one a big ol' pass.



March 26,2025
... Show More
The curator of the Louvre is murdered but manages to leave several clues for Robert Langdon and cryptologist Sophie Neveu to follow, and hopefully, to save an age old religious secret from falling into the wrong hands. Interesting enough premise, but not very satisfying as a thriller . It just doesn’t thrill. It’s maybe one of those rare occasions where I would recommend the movie.

March 26,2025
... Show More
داستان جذابی داشت و ترجمه واقعا عالی بود. دارم فکر میکنم اگر با یه ترجمه بد میخوندمش شاید اصلا به آخرش نمیرسیدم چون قرار نبود چیزی متوجه بشم. مترجم پاورقیهای زیادی داره و درباره اشخاص، اماکن و... توضیح داده که اتفاقا دونستنشون برام جالب بود.

داستان از این قراره: یه قتل توی موزه لوور اتفاق میفته. رئیس موزه کشته شده و پلیس میاد و صحنه جرم رو بررسی میکنه و یه اسم اونجاست؛ رابرت لنگدان، استاد نمادشناسی. وقتی رابرت میاد اونجا متوجه میشه که میخوان قتل رو بندازن گردنش چون پلیسا حدس زدن مقتول اسم قاتلش رو در لحظات آخر نوشته اما قضیه چیز دیگه‌ای هست. اینو سوفی نوو یکی از ماموران حاضر در موزه هم میدونه پس سعی میکنه رابرت لنگدان رو نجات بده تا راز قتل رئیس موزه لوور مشخص بشه.

کتاب پر از رمز و رمزنگاریه. همینطور نمادها و داستانهای جالبی از گذشته میگه که من نمیدونستم. یکم هم از آثار داوینچی یاد گرفتم. درکل شبیه به یه کلاس درس اما از نوع جذابش بود.
دو نکته منفی برای من وجود داشت. اول اینکه شخصیت پردازی ضعیف بود. ما چیز زیادی از افکار و زندگی شخصیت‌ها نمیخوندیم. من دوست دارم بیشتر شخصیت اصلی رو بشناسم تا درگیر رفتارها و انتخابهاش بشم.
دوم اینکه چیز زیادی برای حدس زدن وجود نداشت. خود نویسنده همه جوابهارو میداد چون معماها به رازهای تاریخی و نمادشناسی و رمزگشایی ربط داشتن که برای کسی که اطلاعاتی به این گستردگی نداره قابل حدس نبودن.
با این حال بنظرم کتاب خوبی بود و پیشنهادش میکنم.
March 26,2025
... Show More
No, I am not!

No, I am not going to write a review about this piece of nonsense just because I had yet ANOTHER of those incredibly annoying conversations (in a bookstore to top it off!).

No, I am not.

Oh, for goodness sake!

It is NOT a great book to broaden your cultural horizons, and whatever the humbug mentioned on Leonardo - it is NOT equivalent to reading a book researched by a REAL art historian, - which is something entirely different from a blind-folded arrogant gold digging bestseller author.

It is not a well-written, exciting thriller.

It is Brown in Wonderland, minus the humour, the wit and the beautiful language of the Wonderland Alice visited, and minus the credible plot.

It is not something a bookworm like me HAS to read! Okay? Once and for all, no!

"Lisa, you as a book lover and art historian must love Dan Brown!"

No! Period. I don't. I read three ... THREE! ... of his arrogant idiocies posing as novels. I DON'T love him.

It makes me furious to get the question, over and over:

"How much of what he discovered on Leonardo is true?"

I did not write a review, I hope. It would have been a bad one. Let's forget it.
March 26,2025
... Show More
The novel that thrust Professor Robert Langdon, a Harvard symbolist into the public eye.

A great puzzle murder mystery as curator of the Louvre Jacques Saunière is found dead, he’s body posed just like Da Vinci’s - Vitruvian Man.
It’s a race against time as Langdon is accused of the murder, the story jumps around at a breathtaking speed with art and history being integral to solving the murder.

It’s a fun thrill ride that instantly had me hooked.
March 26,2025
... Show More
ماذا أقول...ماذا أقول؟؟
إبدااااااااااااااااااااع
March 26,2025
... Show More
Alternate history, uchronias, and indirect criticism of faith and ideology combined into one of the most successful thriller series of all time.

The separate parts were already there
Everything was already on the table, many authors had dealt with the different ideas Brown is mixing together, and finding and recombining conspiracy theories isn´t that complicated. It´s the mix of different topics that interest many people stirred together that make it entertaining for the ones who like art or thrillers, for atheists and religious people, for the ones interested in plot or characterization, it´s just difficult to find someone who would immediately say that she/he isn´t interested in one of the plot vehicles.

Uchronia, dystopia, or big history?
It doesn´t just relativizes general history, but religious and political history in a way that makes it a prime example of the fact that history and holy texts are written by the winners. Widening the range, questioning the status quo, and making people skeptical regarding omniscience, commandments, and whatever is something of huge importance. Brown did more than Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens combined and multiplied could have done in centuries by reaching so many people and making them think about the legitimation of any kind of belief.

Religious fan fiction
Imagine many people would start writing fanfiction like that about different religious texts, expanding universes with new and alternative prophets, letting the whole thing collapse into a parody of itself within years.

Hard vs soft science
I tend to equate religious, economic, and political science texts for the simple reason that, as soon as there is one more truth, or in hard science, formulas, and equations, the others or even the own one must the wrong. The more open criticism and sarcastic to profound interpretations of all those one hit wonders are made by sophisticated, young people, the less power all of those charlatanries can generate in their stupid quest towards the one and only variation of reality they want to establish.

Blasphemy in a  Why can´t JC have a daughter, what´s your problem dudes? It´s so ridiculous, if any prophet would be a woman or, gosh, a lesbian (or even a gay male prophet), they would of course completely freak out even more.

Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...

A wiki walk can be as refreshing to the mind as a walk through nature in this completely overrated real life outside books:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...
Sakrileg ist der Titel der 2004 erschienenen Übersetzung eines
March 26,2025
... Show More
This book, this book, this hopelessly stupid book. It's okay. It's something to read. It's not the worst book I've ever read. I did get through the whole thing. But, simply, it is not THAT good.
I will now proceed to quote from another reviewer, Mer, who has said exactly what I have been saying for years -albeit she does it far more eloquently than I:

"The characters are weakly drawn. The dialog is excruciating. The research is shoddy and self-serving at best. The plot, no matter how open-minded you are, is beyond ludicrous.(...)
"I'm all for fictional subversion of the dominant Catholic paradigm, but only if the subverter knows what the hell they're talking about. Brown DOESN'T. He's all "la la la, connect the dots" but the picture he comes up with is awkward and unconvincing.
"The DaVinci Code is a dead easy, nay, downright lazy read, and yet droves of people are patting themselves on the back for having read and *gasp* actually understood it. Like this is some spectacular achievement? WHY? What, because the slipcover describes it as "erudite"? Are you fucking kidding me?
"Don't believe the hype, kids. You are profoundly more intelligent than this holiday page-turner gives you credit for."

So, so, so true. And if you've read "Angels and Demons" you'll see that it starts out precisely the way "Code" does, nearly word-for-word, even using the dreaded looks-at-himself-in-the-mirror character description cop-out.

This, and the man (the author, that is) looks like a troll. A self-aggrandizing oh-so-clever stuffed pompous troll. All he did was capitalize on a theme that's been out there for years, insist that it was all 100% factual, and put a pretty red cover on it. He's created a sensation and got himself a movie, I'll give him that. I bet he swims around in vaults of money every night cackling at his deluded readership.

But the book is just NOT THAT GOOD. Get over it. Want something historical? Read Anya Seton. Something thrilling? Read Thomas Tryon. Richard North Patterson. Jon Krakauer. Croikey, even Clive Cussler! Anything but that damn Dan Brown.
March 26,2025
... Show More
الرجل الفيتروفي ايقونة الحضارة الغريبة يتحول الى :الجثة الاكثر شهرة ادبيا عندما استخدم سونيير دمه كحبر ومستعملاً بطنه كلوحة..رسم عليه رمزاً بسيطا :اًلنجمة الخماسية لننطلق لاغرب مجموعة من الرموز قد تقابلها في حياتك


اجمل ما يمنحنا إياه إي كتاب :المعلومات الممتعة..و
هناك روايات تمت كتابتها لتحتفظ بها في رف خاص :رف الصدارة ..فبعض المعلومات لن تبحث عنها بنفسك ابدا
ولكنك ستلتهمها اذا وضعها لك دان براون في اطار مغامرات شيقة لن تنساها ما حييت

فمن ينسى الشفرات البارعة واللعب بالكلمات
..والرسائل المستترة..والجناس التصحيفي
..و الوقت المتامر ضد البطل والحفيدة
و ترتيب الأحداث في يوم واحد في براعة لا تجدها الا عند براون
..و المفاجأة في النهاية

و الضجة التي إثارتها الرواية. .الضجة التي أعادت الكتب رونقها
March 26,2025
... Show More
This is a pretty formulaic page turner, a fun quick read. Written at about the level of the average Nancy Drew mystery, it is best appreciated at that level. As far as the content, there are howlers on virtually every page (starting with the hero who looks like "Harrison Ford in Harris tweed" and is a "Professor of Religious Symbology at Harvard" -- good work if you can find it). You have to ignore very pulpy, cheesy writing to enjoy this romantic thriller.

Intended as a book that a dedicated reader could finish in a day, or something you take to the beach and casually finish in a weekend, The Da Vinci Code makes for a reasonable airline novel, so much so that it is often a bit clunky in its desire to ensure that no intellectual effort on the reader's part will be required. Here's a recurring example in this novel: a bit of unfamiliar terminology, say "crux gemmata" (jeweled cross) will will be explained on page N, then on page N+1, a character will finger his jeweled cross and explain, "Oh, yes -- this is a crux gemmata." I've read dinner menus that were more demanding on the reader. My wife and I both read about a third of it in a day, sharing the same copy, and that's a full work day plus taking care of kids, bedtime, etc. That's also a kind of virtue, I guess -- it's fast and peppy.

As far as history goes, Dan Brown apparently thinks that "most historians" give credence to the hoary forgeries and frauds promoted in sensationalist best-sellers like Holy Blood, Holy Grail. This author gets the best of both worlds: simultaneously claiming that "it's just fiction," while introducing the novel with claims that the historical record contained within is "fact." That claim is ridiculous. To pluck a random example, he spends some time talking about the Council of Nicaea, and incorrectly summarizes it as the origin of the doctrine of Christ's divinity by Constantine. He ignores the Arian controversy out of which it arose, which is like trying to explain the Treaty of Versailles without mentioning World War I. He ignores the documented fact, agreed upon even by the cheerleaders of the gnostics that he is sympathetic to, that the earliest gnostic doctrines held that Christ was *purely* God, and not really man -- the very reverse of the doctrine that serves as the linchpin of his novel's intellectual base (such as it is). This is a bad novel for weak or misinformed Christians, but anyone familiar with history should spot the train wreck of Brown's ideas a mile off.

Oh yes, and in Brown's world, Opus Dei has shadowy assassin "monks" (in real life, Opus Dei is not a monastic order -- there are no Opus Dei monks, let alone trained assassins), and the Catholic Church has been promulgating known lies as its central dogmas, promotes violence throughout the world, and has been retarding the progress of science and knowledge for 2 millennia. Brown leaves the reader with the impression that this, too, is a matter of settled historical record. Oh, but then again, it's just fiction. Except when it's not.

In general, if you're looking for a heady thriller wrapped around Christian arcana, I'd recommend Umberto Eco's excellent The Name of the Rose, not this dumbed down, by-the-numbers novel.
March 26,2025
... Show More
Antrą kartą imu šią knygą į rankas. Pirmąjį kartą, prieš 10 metų, man ji paliko labai didelį įspūdį, buvo nuostabos kupinos akys. Dabar perskaičius ir vėl galvoju, puiki knyga. Simbolių tyrinėjimas, paslaptys, istorija, religija, apgaulės, žymiausi menininkai, atradimai, įvairios detalės, matematika, kodai.. Autorius pateikia ir daugelį paaiškinimų. Knyga sukelia labai daug klausimų, kas tiesa, o kas rašytojo išgalvota. Nejučia pradedi googlinti paveikslus, vietas ir pats imi 'studijuoti' medžiagą. Šis kūrinys suteikia daug temų diskusijoms, apšviečia, taip pat kelia atidumą bei susižavėjimą menu ir unikaliu menininkų protu. Buvo labai idomu. Dabar bus proga vėl pažiūrėti ir prisiminti filmą "Da Vinčio kodas".
March 26,2025
... Show More
I freely admit that my disdain for The Da Vinci Code is my own personal backlash over its popularity.

Dan Brown isn't a terrible writer, despite facing that charge from many experienced readers. He has a likable style, and he drives the pace of the book relentlessly, which is exactly what one would want from a pulpy adventure that one can take to the beach.

Likewise, the charge that The Da Vinci Code is somehow a failure because it is in any way inaccurate or unbelievable is unfair. The story is fiction, after all, and one should expect to have his/her credulity stretched, especially when reading pulp that is written with the screen in mind (as The Da Vinci Code surely was).

I even enjoyed the Sunday afternoon it took me to read The Da Vinci Code. It was an absolute waste of time and exactly what I wanted to be doing, sitting on a comfy sofa, drinking tea and reading about self-flagellating albino monks (and other fun things).

I've given many books that are just as good as The Da Vinci Code and even some that are worse three stars, and I meant every star. The truth is that on its own merits, I'd have given The Da Vinci Code a similar rating if not for a repeated experience that led to my backlash.

At the beginning of every semester, in a bid to get to know my students better, I play a memory game wherein the students provide me with their favourite things (books, food, music) and some personal details (people they hate, people they love, things they are proud of), then I connect something about them, something that stands out for me, with their name. It is a good start in getting to know the students, but it has also led to my hatred for Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code.

A good half of the students that enter my courses declare that they don't have favourite books, and/or they've only ever read three books in their lives -- two involuntary (both assigned by an English teacher, and always seeming to include To Kill a Mockingbird) and one voluntary (The Da Vinci Code). What pisses me off most is that even if these people liked The Da Vinci Code, Brown's novel didn't spur them on to read more. They read the The Da Vinci Code, enjoyed it or didn't, then went back to their reading apathy.

Moreover, if I could convince people to read one book voluntarily, one book for their pleasure, it would not be ANY cheesy, pulpy, low grade adventure story. It's like pouring a glass of $9 dollar wine for a person who is trying wine for the first time. They may enjoy the glass, but they're not going to choose wine as their alcohol of choice based on Fortant de France.

And for that reason, I hate The Da Vinci Code. It is the cheap wine that keeps people away from the joy of good wine, and while I admit that it is the fault of popular culture rather than Dan Brown, each reader I find who stops at The Da Vinci Code makes me hate the book a little bit more.
 1 2 3 4 5 下一页 尾页
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.