I can hardly express in words my profound adoration for this book. Sylvia Plath introduced me to the enchanting world of poetry, both in reading and writing, and I will forever be indebted to her. I must admit that I'm rather tired of hearing how 'dark' and'melodramatic' this collection is. There seems to be a preoccupation with pathologizing Plath and her readers in any discussion of her work. It's an easy way to dismiss her, but I believe far fewer people recognize what an incredibly precise, metaphorically adept, and witty writer she was.
Of course, there is much melancholy here, but people often overlook the remarkable humor. Consider 'The Applicant' or 'A Secret,' where the speaker suggests her husband stuff his lover's lingerie with apple cloves because it "smells of salt cod." Or this wonderful passage from 'Stopped Dead': "We're here on a visit, / with a goddamn baby screaming off somewhere. / There's always a bloody baby in the air. / I'd call it a sunset, but / whoever heard a sunset yowl like that?" And what about the tenderness in poems like 'Nick and the Candlestick' where she addresses her child, saying, "You are the one solid the spaces lean on. / You are the baby in the barn"? Or 'Morning Song,' where the speaker becomes utterly fascinated with her infant's developing language: "now you try / your handful of notes; / the clear vowels rise like balloons." The Restored Edition of Ariel ends on the bee sequence rather than on 'Words' and 'Edge,' and the message becomes one of regeneration rather than of suicidal erasure.
Certainly, there is darkness. By suggesting we remember other aspects of the collection, I do not mean to undermine the power of the monstrous, the suicidal, the bleak, and the stunning violence in this book. In my view, Plath's poems notoriously exclude the other. There is no room for two figures in her work; someone must be annihilated. (Perhaps with the exception of some of the motherhood poems like 'Nick' and 'Morning Song.') Sometimes this occurs in the tearing apart of the self, as beautifully demonstrated in the infamous 'Lady Lazarus.' At other times, the speaker of the poems becomes the woman-monster of Dickinson's 'Dare You See a Soul at the White Heat?' as seen in 'Purdah,' 'Fever 103,' 'Lady Lazarus' again ("I eat men like air"), 'Ariel,' and 'A Birthday Present.' At times, the speaker is murdered by a terrible force, as in 'Tulips' or 'The Rabbit Catcher'; at others, as in 'Daddy' and 'Medusa,' the speaker's murderous impulse backfires and consumes her.
What Plath does, in a way that no one else quite manages (except perhaps Anne Sexton at times), is capture the surreality of modern existence, particularly in the domestic sphere and within the confines of the nuclear family, through violent mythmaking. If Anne Sexton takes the world around her, including fairytales, legends, and biblical texts, and brings them into the most private spaces, Plath takes the most minute experiences and transforms them into myth. I cannot force anyone to like or respect Plath, but her poetry haunts and inspires me constantly, and of course, I would like to share that as much as possible. Forget the cultural baggage surrounding her; read the book and form your own conclusion. Whether you love it or hate it, the experience alone will be worthwhile.
It sticks like a knife from your shelves. “Ariel: The Restored Edition” is a rectification of a previously published edition. I neither possess that former one nor care to. Unless, of course, you are the sort of person willing to revisit her infamous feud with her husband, Ted Hughes, and speak of uncertainties. Perhaps the most fitting introduction to this restored edition is the foreword by their daughter, Frieda Hughes. It serves as a speed bump for readers diving into this with preconceptions of who Plath and Hughes are and the dynamics between them. Her mother is not to be overinterpreted or seen as one-dimensional, and her father is not to be vilified. “We already have a gravestone,” Frieda says, as they insist on decorating Fitzroy Road, the place she stuck her head in the oven, with a Blue plaque. Instead, it now decorates 3 Chalcot Square, where she spent most of her happier days. It, befittingly, celebrates Sylvia’s life and not her unfortunate demise.
However tormented Sylvia Plath appears in her work, her stillness also manifests within some of the poems. I agree that its deeply personal nature is difficult to avoid. Excluding personal relationships with her husband and other family members, most notably her father with poems like “Daddy” or “The Jailor” is impossible. But I also invite anyone picking up this book to actively view Sylvia as a human who also laughed and experienced many normal, happy days. She had the misfortune of allowing her sentiments to cut deep; her sadness cut as deep as her joy, and ultimately deeper. Rather than being labelled as some revengeful feminist or tormented artist, she should be adorned.
Her style is very cerebral and stark, but sometimes endearing. In her opening “Morning Song”, how she wants to be introduced, is very soft, speaking of a birth. “Love set you going like a fat gold watch. The midwife slapped your footsoles, and your bald cry Took its place among the elements.” Her imagery, her cryptic symbolism and her strong female voice are unique. How she borrows seemingly unrelated objects to help her paint a beautiful, unanticipated mosaic of words, that you can adorn only after the process of painting is over. I always pause in awe at “Cut”: “Little pilgrim, The Indian’s axed your scalp. Your turkey wattle Carpet rolls Straight from the heart.” Or this brilliant sentence from “The Courage of Shutting Up” “The courage of the shut mouth, in spite of artillery!” I can hear her recordings for BBC in my head. Her voice is vivid, strong, unlike her inherent weakness. Sometimes, however, the exposure is too much, the revengeful outpour almost too scathing, efficient, but not enjoyable to read through. The allusions to death, to blood, the melodramatic undertones of some of her monologues are akin to childlike sentiments bottled in agitated soda cans, ready to pop.
An accompanying associate to this book is some analysis of her work. Something to un-code some of her more ambiguous reads is needed. I do not have a recommendation for that other than “Google Search”. This won’t be my first read for sure. A re-read is in order sometime later; a conjuring of Sylvia in my study, her mystery, and her anguish.