Regarding
When the Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded in 1930 for the first time to a writer from the New World - the American Sinclair Lewis - the Swedish Academy justified this choice of Sinclair Lewis by saying that it was "for his powerful and graphic description, and his ability to create a new type of characters with all their richness and lightness of shadow."
This description was very accurate. By that time, Sinclair Lewis had created, with all his might, characters that are unforgettable, from Martin Arrowsmith in the novel "Arrowsmith" - which was presented by the National Center for Translation in 2009 with a translation by Mahmoud Aziz Moussa - to Elmer Gantry in the eponymous novel, which unfortunately has not been translated, to Carol Milford in the novel "Main Street" - which was presented by the Nahdat Misr Publishing House in 1967 with a translation by Aminah El-Saei - and finally George Babbitt in the novel "Babbitt" - which was presented by Dar Al-Tanweer in 2015 with a wonderful translation by Harth Al-Nabhani. All these characters that Sinclair Lewis captured and presented with a scathing satire, once of the middle class, another of the scientific community, and a third of the religious fanatics. Sinclair Lewis, in all this, was following a keen American tradition in discovering and revealing unforgettable human characters. We all know very well the poor lover Jay Gatsby, the confused teenager Holden Caulfield, the crazy old man Humbert Humbert, the ethical lawyer Atticus Finch, the old fisherman Santiago, the dull academic William Stoner, and many other characters that were invented by American novelists.
In "Babbitt," we get to know George Babbitt, a middle-aged man, married with a son and two daughters, working as a real estate agent in the city of Zenith in the 1920s. Lewis uses the character of Babbitt and his ideas and actions to satirize and harshly criticize the American middle class. For this reason, his winning the Nobel Prize was a shock to the Americans, because they considered it a European caricature of the image he presented of them through Sinclair Lewis's characters. But Lewis doesn't care about all this. He even refuses, several years before the Nobel Prize, the Pulitzer Prize that was offered to him for his novel "Arrowsmith."
But Babbitt is not a completely fictional image. He exists among us. He is more like a symbol of the middle class not only in the time period in which the novel was written but even in our time, almost a century after the novel was written. For this reason, we can easily, starting from the novel, coin the term "Babbittism" to describe all these social individuals who act in their work, family, and social lives based on the fairness of facts and mountains of assumptions. The Babbitt is a fictional person at his core, superficial, verbose, with an exaggerated idea of himself and his social values. The Babbitt loves big words and is enthusiastic about new ideas even if he doesn't understand them. We can summarize the Babbitt by saying that he thinks he is living in a fantasy that he will later collide with the facts.
One of the most beautiful events in the novel that shows this Babbittian trait begins when George Babbitt goes on a solo mountain trip to collect the remains of his deceased friend. Babbitt decides on the way that the mountains are for men, and he is a tough man like the guide. So he decides to take a long walk with his guide. It is a heroic trip in which they penetrate the forest on foot. Babbitt imagines the heroic glory that the distance, walking, and heroic feeling will bring him. The guide tries to convince him to take a boat on a river trip that will shorten a lot of the distance to the camp, as many non-Babbitts do. But Babbitt refuses because this definitely goes against his imagined heroism and destroys the carefully drawn illusions. The guide surrenders, and they end up lost in the middle of the forest, with their feet hurting and no heroic conversations. This is how the Babbitt acts and lives his life, and this is how his beliefs, convictions, and political views are.
Lewis tries, in the enjoyable chapters, to explore what would happen if Babbitt tried to break free from his Babbittian state. We see George Babbitt influenced by the ideas of a university professor about workers and their rights. He begins to try to understand what is going on around him instead of being proud of his imagined ideas. He also begins to flee from the boredom of his married life and the burden of society and its dull social occasions. But society is tough and takes responsibility for returning him to the fold. Society always builds itself on thousands of Babbitts, and there is no place in it for those who are outside of Babbittism. So society takes care to make Babbitt feel alienated, rejected, and worthless. This reminds us somewhat of the situation that Albert Camus described in his novel "The Stranger" when Meursault is judged not because of what he did but because of his difference and strangeness. But unlike Meursault, society leaves a door open for Babbitt to return through, which he does happily. This is how Babbitt returns to be even more Babbittian and more miserable.
The importance of recycling truly cannot be overemphasized. It plays a crucial role in multiple aspects. Firstly, it significantly helps in reducing waste. By recycling materials such as paper, plastic, and metal, we can prevent them from ending up in landfills, which are already filling up at an alarming rate.
Secondly, recycling is essential for conserving natural resources. For example, recycling paper can save trees, which are vital for maintaining ecological balance. Similarly, recycling metals like aluminum and steel can reduce the need for mining, thereby conserving precious minerals and reducing the environmental impact of mining activities.
Moreover, recycling has significant economic benefits. It creates jobs in the recycling industry, from collection and sorting to processing and manufacturing of recycled products. This not only provides employment opportunities but also contributes to the growth of the economy.
In conclusion, recycling is a win-win situation for both the environment and the economy. We should all make an effort to recycle as much as possible and encourage others to do the same.