Murdoch emphasizes the importance of the unconscious mind in art. She believes that an artist must be at least half in love with it as it provides the motive force and does a great deal of the work. Her own works, such as "Sketch of a Just Man" and others, were influenced by her unconscious. She argues that literature is a disciplined technique for arousing emotions and that art is close to playing with unconscious forces. It is mimesis and good art is anamnesis, a memory of what we did not know we knew. She also discusses the relationship between art and philosophy, stating that art goes deeper than philosophy. Formalists, she believes, want to cure us of the realistic fallacy of imagining we look through language into a separate world beyond. She thinks words should be seen as a medium through which one relates to the world.
Regarding truth in art, Murdoch says that literature is often criticized for being untruthful. She defines truth in art from what falsifies it. She later writes that the good artist is a vehicle of truth as he formulates ideas and focuses attention on facts. The paradox of art is that the work itself may have to invent the methods by which we verify it. She also comments on modern writing, which is more ironical and less confident than that of the nineteenth century. In a novel, the conflict between the representational and formal may appear as that between characters and plot. A bad writer gives way to personal obsession without concern for truth or justice.
Murdoch also touches on morality, stating that it is pictured without a transcendent background. She believes that a man's moral life is not only his choices but also his vision. She defines Sartre's idea of consciousness as being for itself and nothing, yet the source of all meaning. She criticizes Sartre for not accepting that emotion consciousness has an unconscious meaning. She also discusses Hampshire's argument that will is dependent on desires, beliefs, and thinking. She believes that the unconscious will comes first and puts on desire, love, or emotion to make one focus and do what it wants. She gives an example of her experience with Lawrence to illustrate the power of the unconscious will. Finally, she defines love as the imaginative recognition and respect for the otherness of an individual and emphasizes that goodness is a function of the will and is connected to knowledge.
A collection of philosophical essays by one of the greatest British philosophers and novelists of the twentieth century awaits you. This remarkable work invites you to embark on a profound journey of exploration. Delve into this book and discover the sheer delights of Murdoch's prose. Her writing is a masterclass in elegance and precision, captivating the reader from the very first page.
As you turn the pages, you will gain valuable insights into a wide range of philosophical concepts. Murdoch's exploration of Plato offers a fresh perspective on the ancient philosopher's ideas, while her examination of existentialism delves deep into the human condition. With her keen intellect and incisive analysis, Murdoch challenges you to think deeply about the nature of reality, morality, and the meaning of life.
This collection of essays is not only a testament to Murdoch's philosophical prowess but also a source of inspiration and enlightenment. Whether you are a seasoned philosopher or simply someone with a curious mind, this book is sure to leave a lasting impression. So, pick up this book and prepare to be transported to a world of profound thought and intellectual stimulation.
Man is a remarkable creature. He has the unique ability to create a mental picture of himself, an image that represents his ideals, aspirations, and self-perception. And then, through a series of actions, behaviors, and choices, he gradually comes to resemble that very picture he has painted in his mind. This process is both fascinating and powerful. It shows how our thoughts and beliefs can shape our reality and determine who we become.
Really glad I don't have to be seen reading this on the bus for another month. Maybe it's because I feel a bit self-conscious about what others might think. Or perhaps it's just that I'm ready to move on to something new and different. Whatever the reason, it's a relief to know that I won't have to endure the potential scrutiny or judgment of my fellow passengers for a while.
Reading this requires patience and attention, and perhaps that's the whole essence. It's truly worthwhile, and don't anticipate being overly entertained. For me, it was like a workout for the brain.
Telling a story and presenting a logical proof share the same intention: 'I'm going to make it impossible for you not to believe me. And I'll do it in a way that can overcome the common barriers such as language, geography, and time.' You get the impression that Murdoch was conscious that her reader would be looking for logical flaws and unnecessary ambiguity, just as a scientist would. She goes a step further and encourages us to apply this in our personal interactions.
In art, writing, or philosophy, we agree to be deceived. We humor stories in the hope that short-term relative deception will lead to long-term transcendent truth. However, in this book, Murdoch chooses not to use this approach. She is observational and adheres to logical patterns.
Takeaways:
It's impractical to overlook life's mystery, and Murdoch urges us to rein in our egos. She states, "But did I really decide? To examine that question I examine the context of my announcement rather than its private core (13)." Habitually remembering that our opinions are likely the result of our own personal histories (which is basically humility, checking ourselves before we make a mess) is equivalent to living righteously.
Murdoch's approach to relationships is far less romantic and more of a scientific consequence of our situation on earth. For example, on a daily basis, we all hope that nothing terrible will occur, but evidence is everywhere that it's happening constantly. It's a precarious position. We are wired to think that we are the center of the universe and permanent ('they'll die, but not me'). Obviously, this isn't true, and we know it. Murdoch seems to want us to always remember this, which makes sense because we should all strive to quickly and habitually 'elevate ourselves.' Any rational person would desire to do so, and the necessity is profoundly fundamental.
So, in a difficult situation, should we resist or be compassionate? When you think it through, I believe it's the same. If you understand someone in a way that allows them to do evil things, you're not truly understanding them. When we truly consider that anything could happen to any loved one at any time, that our ability to love is so limited and therefore we are incredibly vulnerable, along with the idea that our egos and sense of being separate is actually delusional, attentive patience will be the outcome of any thorough examination of our condition here.