I am very glad that I read this, even though the essays were diverse. The topics that I expected to like, such as existentialism and literature, I actually didn't entirely enjoy. Her critiques on existentialism, especially regarding the concept of freedom, are quite good. However, that's the aspect of the philosophy that I don't really care about anyway.
Moreover, her view of literature is really different from mine. She has a preference for the classics, which I find rather boring, and dislikes the modern type of neurotic journey to enlightenment novels that I often enjoy. Although I'm sure many of those are as solipsistic garbage as she claims.
What I ended up liking the most was what I initially thought I might skip. Her moral ideas, especially the neo-platonic elements, are really convincing. I like the idea of striving towards a goodness that perceives reality as it truly is and views people as infinitely particular. And the notion that the striving itself could be something that replaces the function of prayer. There is much more to it.
A lot of it was beyond my comprehension, but a great deal of it also changed my perspective and inspired me. Thank you, Iris.
A collection of essays written by Iris Murdoch offers a profound exploration. Her lectures are also incorporated, along with a few pieces initially published as interviews. Murdoch critiques every aspect of literature related to philosophy, delving into the similarities and differences in their genealogies.
Intriguingly, despite its length, this book examines language not just as a scholarly pursuit but as a mode of expression. Murdoch weaves together an intimate understanding of language with experience and imagination, exploring the role of literature and philosophy, how self-expression emerges in literature, and how philosophy bridges literature, poetry, and the characteristic human experience.
She explains that philosophy, though impersonal, comes close to providing clarity and emotional orientation, something literature often struggles with due to its less severe and objective treatment of mental experiences. Reading philosophy requires a different set of eyes, a mental perspective distinct from that of reading literature.
The book also discusses truth and fiction, the fiction within the portrayal of truth and vice versa. There is discourse on morality, art, virtue, goodness, the true meaning of the Sublime in language, and the need for stories and imagination to赋予life and living meaning, purpose, and direction.
Murdoch probes the atmosphere in which literature and philosophy, fact and myth, imitation and reality coexist. Some of the favorite essays include "Nostalgia for the Particular," "The Novelist as Metaphysician," "The Existential Bite," "Mass, Might, and Myth," "Sublime and the Good," and the eponymous essay "Existentialists and Mystics."