Of Mice and Men

... Show More
“I got you to look after me, and you got me to look after you, and that's why.”

They are an unlikely pair: George is "small and quick and dark of face"; Lennie, a man of tremendous size, has the mind of a young child. Yet they have formed a "family," clinging together in the face of loneliness and alienation. Laborers in California's dusty vegetable fields, they hustle work when they can, living a hand-to-mouth existence. But George and Lennie have a plan: to own an acre of land and a shack they can call their own.

While the powerlessness of the laboring class is a recurring theme in Steinbeck's work of the late 1930s, he narrowed his focus when composing Of Mice and Men, creating an intimate portrait of two men facing a world marked by petty tyranny, misunderstanding, jealousy, and callousness. But though the scope is narrow, the theme is universal: a friendship and a shared dream that makes an individual's existence meaningful.

A unique perspective on life's hardships, this story has achieved the status of timeless classic due to its remarkable success as a novel, a Broadway play, and three acclaimed films.

107 pages, Paperback

First published February 25,1937

This edition

Format
107 pages, Paperback
Published
January 1, 2002 by Penguin Books
ISBN
9780142000670
ASIN
0142000671
Language
English
Characters More characters
  • George Milton

    George Milton

    A quick-witted man who is Lennies guardian and best friend. His friendship with Lennie helps him to sustain his dream of a better future, but it ends with the death of his friend.more...

  • Lennie Small

    Lennie Small

    A gigantic, physically strong imbecile who travels with George and is his constant companion. He dreams of "living off the fatta the lan" and being able to tend to rabbits. His love for soft things is a weakness, mostly because he does not kno...

  • Candy

    Candy

    ...

  • Curley

    Curley

    ...

  • Curley's Wife
  • Slim

    Slim

    ...

About the author

... Show More
John Ernst Steinbeck was an American writer. He won the 1962 Nobel Prize in Literature "for his realistic and imaginative writings, combining as they do sympathetic humor and keen social perception". He has been called "a giant of American letters."
During his writing career, he authored 33 books, with one book coauthored alongside Edward F. Ricketts, including 16 novels, six non-fiction books, and two collections of short stories. He is widely known for the comic novels Tortilla Flat (1935) and Cannery Row (1945), the multi-generation epic East of Eden (1952), and the novellas The Red Pony (1933) and Of Mice and Men (1937). The Pulitzer Prize–winning The Grapes of Wrath (1939) is considered Steinbeck's masterpiece and part of the American literary canon. By the 75th anniversary of its publishing date, it had sold 14 million copies.
Most of Steinbeck's work is set in central California, particularly in the Salinas Valley and the California Coast Ranges region. His works frequently explored the themes of fate and injustice, especially as applied to downtrodden or everyman protagonists.

Community Reviews

Rating(3.9 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
27(27%)
4 stars
39(39%)
3 stars
33(33%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews All reviews
April 16,2025
... Show More
"Yet each man kills the thing he loves..."

Oscar Wilde's prison poem came to mind not only for its literal truth in the context of Lenny and George, but also because it evokes the brutal isolation of the whole cast of characters, each one of them stuck in their separate reality and unable to connect with each other. The young lonely wife has nobody to confide in, and keeps looking for trouble out of sheer isolation. The black man is so utterly alone that he is almost insane, and the barrier of his skin colour is even more impenetrable than the woman's gender. George's loneliness is connected to his responsibility for Lenny, and Lenny himself is in the brutal prison of his intellectual inferiority and herculean strength. Even the boss' son is in a no man's land between privilege and torture.

The dream of sharing a future together keeps the men's spirits alive for a while, and it is contagious. Breaking out of the isolation, enjoying freedom and partnership - those are powerful ideas.

"Yet each man kills the thing he loves..."

The domino effect of Lenny's inability to control his strength or his craving for softness and love makes all dreamers wake up to a nightmare without end. The only solace is finding another human being who understands enough of the pain of killing what one loves to offer a sign of support or friendship in the misery of reality.

Lenny broke my heart, and yet I had to smile at his limited vision over and over again. When I first read this novel, I was a busy teenager, bored and frustrated that school picked my reading materials for me, not willing to enter into the confused minds of men with whom I had seemingly nothing in common. With hindsight, I see myself in a cloud of ignorance, not fully grasping what happened around me, missing a masterpiece in the process - I was very much like Lenny myself, unaware of the bigger picture of what was going on around me. Reading Of Mice and Men now, to prepare a teaching unit for a new generation of fifteen-year-olds, I find myself more in the role of George, gently coaxing, carefully repeating the information I consider crucial, avoiding too much detail out of fear to completely lose the attention of my students. Lenny and George live a life of their own in my head now, and they have transcended their bitter story and become part of mine.

Just what one expects of a great classic!
April 16,2025
... Show More
I decided to up my rating with one star as I still think about this novella more than 2 years after I read it.

I will definitely remember this book because of the ending. It was brutal and heartbreaking.
April 16,2025
... Show More
موش ها و آدم ها حکایت انسانها ست ، حکایت آرزوهای آنها ، امید به آینده و فردایی داشتن ، امید به آرامش داشتن ، خانواده داشتن ، امید به آزادی و در بند ارباب نبودن ، رویایی داشتن ، امید به داشتن زمین و کاری از خود ، در جایی ریشه داشتن ، امید به همدم و هم راهی داشتن ، رفیقی داشتن
امید به برادری و عدالت داشتن ،امید به اتفاقات محال داشتن ،

امید به معجزه داشتن
April 16,2025
... Show More
How does one rate a Holy Tome of English Lit, when one found the reading experience to be extraordinarily average. . . nay, even sub-par?

I suppose the real question is, am I, like some people, a vote whore who will slap the Big Uno on it, and then index all the book's inadequecies, ignoring all the things the author did well? This will probably gain my review the most interest.

Or shall I, like a dignified book reviewer, give it a Trio, and calmly explain both its flaws and its high points?

Uno it is.

Here's why I thought Of Mice and Men sucked balls:

1. WHAT'S UP with the main character who has no personality other than being large and, like the lame interpretation of Frankenstein from the 30's movie, friendly-yet-stupid and unaware-of-his-own-strength? Super-lame.

2. WHAT'S UP with the other main character who seems to like nothing more than shitting on the big dude's self-esteem, and pointing out how much his own life sucks because of his friendship with said stupid friend? He's not an orgasmically charming fellow himself. In fact, he's Eeyore.

3. WHAT'S UP with the most interesting character being in one fraggin' chapter? I found the black character fascinating, and in this one scene he established himself as more intriguing than anyone else in the whole flippin' book. Then? We never hear from him again.

4. YET AGAIN, Steinbeck makes the main female character a sultry temptress. The way he makes all women into sultry temptresses, you'd think he had a Bible fetish or something. She's the least sympathetic character in a book full of characters I didn't sympathize with.

5. I'm now bored with the numbering system, and shall stop doing it.

Two Steinbeck novels have I loved: East of Eden is one of my very favorite books, and The Grapes of Wrath is also terrific. But this reads like a mediocre Tennessee Williams play, and I frikkin' HATE that guy. Why? It isn't just because of weak characters in this book. It's also because the whole premise of this book sucks, and the ending sucks even more than the premise. It's a snowball of suckiness, culminating in a bang that left me confused, yet simultaneously indifferent.

Perhaps it's because similar plotlines have been littered around the modern age like horse shit at a circus, but DID ANYBODY NOT know EXACTLY WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN from page 10 on? Anyone? Beuller?

Get it? Like. . . movie reference? Nevermind.

Anyway, this sucked. There's no Wishbone episode of this'un, and it's because a Wishbone episode of this would've made kids commit suicide. It's depressing, yet depressingly lame as well.

And there wasn't one damn mouse in the whole book. That's false advertising.
April 16,2025
... Show More
4.5 stars

As expected, this book was gorgeously written, intelligent and touching.
The foreshadowing was perfectly executed (not the only thing perfectly executed, if you catch my drift) and held everything together beautifully.

The only criticism I have is the treatment of the only female character: She is essentially the Evil Whore who makes a Good Man do bad things, and everyone blames her and is sorry for the guy, even though she clearly gets the short end of the stick.

But yeah, definitely a classic for a reason.
April 16,2025
... Show More
С препрочитането на „За мишките и хората“, открих много нови неща и задълбочени послания в тази кратка и мрачна книга на Джон Стайнбек! На пръв поглед обикновената, макар и любопитна история на психопата Лени далеч не е най-важното, заради което тази чудесна творба си заслужава вниманието!
На нейния фон, големият писател всъщност изгражда цялостна, ярка и многопластова картина на живота и обществените нрави от началото на 20-ти век. Тежкият фермерски начин на живот, расовите предразсъдъци и насилието сред хората, утопичните мечти на работниците... това са част от важните теми, засегнати в книгата. Преди сякаш не бях обърнал внимание на Крукс, но вече ми е най-любимият герой от „За мишките и хората“! Освен единствен чернокож, той е и единственият четящ човек сред персонажите...
Книгата несъмнено представя силата на приятелството, но също така и самозаблудите, породени от него.



„Колко съм ги виждал аз такива — скитат по пътищата и по фермите с вързопи на гръб и все имотец им в главата. Един ли е, двама ли са... Дойдат, поработят, па си отидат; и все петимни за парче земя. Всеки за туй си мисли. Ама ни един не си е купил. То е като рая. Аз доста книжки съм попрочел, та знам: парчето земя е като рая — не можеш стигна до него. Но от главите им не излиза.“
April 16,2025
... Show More
"Hey Tim, old buddy… I hear you've been depressed recently. A book should cheer you up, right?"
"Why yes Tim, that sounds delightful. Got any good ideas?"
"How about a classic?"
"Brilliant idea Tim! One I haven't read?"
"Of course! How about Steinbeck?"
"I don't know… I hear he's a bit depressing."
"Come now, it's only 105 pages! How depressing could it be?"



Should I just end the review there? Nah, of course not.



Of Mice and Men is one of those books that pretty much everyone has read. I once saw an article that said it was one of the most commonly read books in High School classes in America. Somehow it is another one of those classics that I managed to never have assigned to me in both High School or College (and I majored in English). Well, I've read it now. My thoughts?

Well, it's a wonderfully well told story, frequently feeling more like a play than a novel, but I mean that as a compliment as it makes for a fast paced conversational tone. It's depressing as all hell mind you, but wonderfully told.

Did I enjoy reading it? No, no I sure as hell did not. I mean the writing is well done, Steinbeck created one of the best literary pairs ever written and managed to have the most perfect moment of foreshadowing I've ever read (in the form of a dog, so animal lovers beware!). I'm very glad I read it and genuinely liked the book. Enjoyment though? No, no and no.

Do I have anything else to add? Not really. It's a short review, because there's really not much I can say that hasn't already been said. I could address how Curley's wife is annoyingly only called Curley's wife despite being a main character, and the treatment she's given in the book… but I think this is entirely because Steinbeck is showing her only from the point of view of his characters. This is further reinforced by an article I saw in which it discussed how he wrote to Claire Luce, the actress who originated the role on stage saying the following about the character: "She is a nice, kind girl and not a floozy. No man has ever considered her as anything except a girl to try to make... As to her actual sex life — she has had none except with Curley and there has probably been no consummation there since Curley would not consider her gratification and would probably be suspicious if she had any." So I guess mission accomplished in showing how others viewed her, but also a bit of a failure if that was his real aim for the character (though I do love his jab at Curley there).

Will I read more Steinbeck in the future? Sure! I apparently like sliding down the rain slick precipice of despair, so why the hell not? 4/5 stars.

"Tell me what you told me before...about them rabbits"
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.