Honestly, I have to say that I really liked this book. It is indeed erotica, but it is of a classic nature. I have a deep love for everything that was written so many years ago, long before I was even born, and yet people still devour these works as if they were recently published.
However, it's important not to read this book straight through in just a few days. Doing so could potentially numb the senses and cause one to lose the true meaning of the stories. You see, this book is composed of short stories about sexual encounters. Anais Nin was very meticulous in ensuring that each story was different from the others. She delved into various sexual subjects, mostly non-standard ones (and I'm careful not to call them abnormal to avoid attracting haters), such as bestiality, incest, pedophilia, sadomasochism, exhibitionism, or homosexuality. If you're not into these particular themes, your reading experience will likely be one of awe and surprise, realizing that people, even in the 1940s when these short erotic stories were written, were already engaging in such activities. Or perhaps they were doing those things and we no longer do, since we now have easy access to pornography or sensual images on the internet that can quickly satisfy our eyes when it comes to absurd things that we thought didn't exist.
In her preface to this book, written in 1977, Anais Nin revealed that she was commissioned by an unnamed publisher, known only as "The Collector," to write erotic short stories. This was in the 1940s, and she got this job only when Henry Miller became so busy that he couldn't write enough to supply "The Collector." So, Nin sent some samples, and the publisher told her to forget about poetry and focus on the sexual acts. And that's exactly what Nin did, resulting in these stories being published as a book posthumously after her death.
Surprisingly, even though Nin thought she had made the stories devoid of poetry, her natural and beautiful prose still managed to shine through. In particular, Nin gave a distinctive sensual voice to her women characters. What do I mean by this? Well, at some points in our lives, we men (and I apologize if I'm speaking only for myself, but I know I'm not a sexual deviant) enjoy watching porn films, even those XXX-rated movies without any recognizable plot at all. Especially when I was much younger, haha. But women? Like my wife, for example, she loves her X-rated films to have a love story incorporated into the plot. Otherwise, she'll fall asleep while I'm still enjoying the movie.
That's why this book is highly recommended to all erotic fans who appreciate the classic works of the masters. It's not like the filthy Fifty Shades of Grey (which I would rate only 1 star), even though so many people have read and liked it. This one has poetry and that unique feminine sensual voice that only Nin could create.
I dare to say it's a classic, and woe to you, E. L. James.
He was in France without papers, risking arrest. For greater security Elena hid him at the apartment of a friend who was away. They met every day now. He liked to meet her in the darkness, so that before they could see each other's face, their hands became aware of the other's presence. Like blind people, they felt each other's body, lingering in the warmest curves, making the same trajectory each time; knowing by touch the places where the skin was softest and tenderest and where it was stronger and exposed to daylight; where, on the neck, the heartbeat was echoed; where the nerves shivered as the hand came nearer to the center, between the legs.This is typical of her approach, which makes use of a lot of short, simple clauses, either separated into different sentences, fairytale-like, or strung together with semicolons into long, dreamy bouts of poetic description. She applies this ruthless sensuality equally to the sex and to the moments of violence or sadism that crop up in the book. I am far from the world's biggest Anaïs Nin fan, but I do think it is important that we have a woman finally writing about this kind of thing, rather than what we had for hundreds of years previously, viz. men guessing what women thought about it. I'm thinking John Cleland, Pierre Louÿs, et hundreds of al. Nin always prompted a lot of varied reactions from other women, some thinking, Finally someone is saying it, and others being more like, Whoa there, speak for yourself, sister. Meanwhile men's excitement was split between the stuff they recognised (‘women think like us!’) and the stuff that seemed new (‘women don't think like us!’). I do think it's interesting that you can draw a line from Delta of Venus in the 1940s right through to, let's say, Nancy Friday's Women on Top in 1991, and see that most of the themes have barely changed at all. I don't think Delta of Venus is a great book, but I do think it's an interesting and important one and I have a real soft spot for it. Of course, in real life Anaïs Nin was as mad as a box of frogs, but she was the right person at the right time and I like a lot of what's in here. As the reviews show, it still has the power to challenge people today, when you might think the whole thing would have seemed rather passé. ‘Don't burn someone's genitals...it is NOT OK,’ says one reviewer earnestly. Well, yes, fair enough…it's just as well then that this isn't fucking reportage, it's a piece of creative writing. Jesus. Now if you'll excuse me, I'll be in my bunk going over page 117 again.
Each short story outdoes the next one, and it gets always weirder and, to be honest, also more disgusting. It's like a never-ending cycle of strange and unappealing tales. The characters and their actions seem to come from the most twisted corners of the imagination. You can't help but be both intrigued and repulsed at the same time. As you read one story, you think it couldn't possibly get any worse, but then the next one proves you wrong. It's a wild ride through a world of oddities and nastiness.