The Flanders Panel

... Show More
While restoring a 15th-century painting which depicts a chess game between the Duke of Flanders and his knight, Julia, a young art expert, discovers a hidden inscription in the corner: Quis Necavit Equitem. Translation: Who killed the knight? Breaking the silence of five centuries, Julia's hunt for a Renaissance murderer leads her into a modern-day game of sin, betrayal, and death.

295 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1990

About the author

... Show More
Arturo Pérez-Reverte Gutiérrez, is a Spanish novelist and ex-journalist. He worked as a war reporter for twenty-one years (1973 - 1994). He started his journalistic career writing for the now-defunct newspaper Pueblo. Then, he jumped to news reporter for TVE, Spanish national channel. As a war journalist he traveled to several countries, covering many conflicts. He put this experience into his book 'Territorio Comanche', focusing on the years of Bosnian massacres. That was in 1994, but his debut as a fiction writer started in 1983, with 'El húsar', a historical novella inspired in the Napoleonic era.

Although his debut was not quite successful, in 1988, with 'The Fencing Master', he put his name as a serious writer of historic novels. That was confirmed in 1996, when was published the first book of his Captain Alatriste saga, which has been his trademark. After this book, he could leave definitely journalism for focusing on his career as a fiction writer. This saga, that happens in the years of the Spanish golden age, has seen, for now, seven volumes, where Pérez-Reverte shows, from his particular point of view, historical events from Spanish history in the 16th century.

Apart from these, he also penned another successful works like Dumas Club and Flanders Panel, titles that, among others, made Pérez-Reverte one of the most famous and bestseller authors of Spanish fiction of our era.

Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
33(33%)
4 stars
41(41%)
3 stars
26(26%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
July 14,2025
... Show More
Half way into this book, I was on the verge of giving it up.

Yet, some strange and morbid curiosity held me back. I still harbored the hope that, perhaps in the final lines, there would be a series of unexpected events, a shocking revelation, or a smarter ending.

But alas, the flat characters followed their predictable paths to the end.

Actually, I was wrong. Not all endings were so foreseeable. For Cesar, the ending was truly horrid.

Throughout the book, it was evident that the author did not hold a very high opinion of gay people or even women. They were always described as being so beautiful, with their physical traits emphasized, and it was implied that they couldn't be good at playing chess because they supposedly cared too much about what others thought.

But to kill the gay antagonist by giving him a rectal tumor? Really? (Well, this wasn't the actual cause of his death, but it was what set the whole charade in motion.)

Now, let's turn back to the plot. It was thin and poorly constructed. I grew tired of all the long paragraphs in which the author seemed to be telling me how I should feel.

Not to mention the numerous phrases describing how Julia was so beautiful and how much she smoked. The scary parts were, at best, rather funny, and the entire writing style was too pretentious for my liking.

If it weren't for the thorough documentation that went into this book, I would have given it just one star.

But to be honest, all those chess-related parts, although well-researched, were sometimes a bit superfluous for those of us who don't play chess.

In conclusion, I would much rather invest my time in other types of murder-mystery books.
July 14,2025
... Show More
I was waiting for more and at some point it was boring.

I had been looking forward to something exciting to happen, but as time passed, nothing significant occurred.

The anticipation had built up within me, but it seemed that my expectations were not going to be met.

I found myself growing impatient and the waiting became tiresome.

I started to wonder if I should just give up and move on to something else.

However, a part of me still held onto the hope that something good would come along.

Maybe it was just a matter of time before the situation changed.

I tried to occupy myself with other things to pass the time, but my mind kept drifting back to what I was waiting for.

Despite the boredom, I remained determined to wait and see what the future held.

July 14,2025
... Show More
Arturo Pérez-Reverte has found a place in my reading heart. When Roman Polanski directed "The Ninth Gate" based on "The Club Dumas", I was deeply impressed. I read the book in one go, returned to it many times, and the emotions it evoked also extended to the author's other works. I had read "The Flanders Panel" before, only remembering that I really liked it. So when @artragepl reissued it, I seized the opportunity.

"Chess has less in common with the art of war, but more with the art of killing."

500 years ago, the master Pieter van Huys painted the picture "The Chess Game", on which he hid the phrase "Quis necavit equitem", meaning "Who killed the knight?". Julia, an art conservator, discovers the inscription and begins a passionate and dangerous adventure, trying to solve the criminal mystery that connects the figures in the picture - the knight, the prince, and his wife. The case from the 15th century surprisingly begins to connect with the present, the interrupted chess game awaits completion, and obsession excludes reason...

Rereading reminded me of what I loved about the author's books. The mixture of history, art, criminal mystery, and characters who authentically intrigue. Julia interested me the least. My favorite became the "unwilling hero", the chess player Muñoz, in the faded cloak, and overall, he was just so faded, pale, and unremarkable. But thanks to his mind, he was able to arouse all my senses. And of course, Cesar, the antiquarian, the subtle dandy connected by a long and complicated bond with Julia.

I don't know how to play chess. It requires logical thinking and considering many decisions "ahead" - it's not for me. Nevertheless, I couldn't tear myself away from the novel. Once again, the author of "The Flanders Panel" managed to charm me because, after all, "Everything is a chessboard of nights and days, on which Fate plays with people like figures"...
July 14,2025
... Show More
I received this as a birthday gift and carried it along on our Thanksgiving journey.

Oh, how I wish I had chosen the Manhattan phone book instead! It would have been filled with far more fascinating characters, and none of them would be as outrageously implausible as the characters in this novel.

The entire structure of the book is so overly contrived that it ultimately crumbles under its own excessive weight.

The novel is constructed around a convoluted metaphor such as "art is chess is life is art," but the more the author labors to make it work, the more tenuous and flimsy it becomes.

The reader seemingly requires a degree in art history and a US Chess Federation rating of Expert or higher to fully understand it.

Even with a full twenty-five pages of explanation at the end (which is always a telltale sign of trouble), I still lack a clear and firm idea of what drove the villain to commit the murders of two people.

I suspect that this novel may be hampered by a rather pedestrian translation. Perhaps it reads significantly better in its original Spanish.

Nonetheless, the author must shoulder the responsibility for the cumbersome and unwieldy structure that detracts from the overall reading experience.
July 14,2025
... Show More

A formidable artistic investigation, along with a suspense due to a part of the chess game which unfortunately I didn't fully understand as I know nothing about the game of chess.


This book was a reread for me, having read the book at its release, but it was like a new reading as I had still forgotten quite a few details.


Although I didn't completely get hooked on the game of chess due to lack of knowledge, I appreciated the artistic-historical-police investigation that involved not only the characters in the painting but also the investigation into the life of the young painting restorer.


It was a beautiful (re)discovery.

July 14,2025
... Show More
The book's main theme revolves around a painting by Peter van Huys. Julia, who is engaged in restoring paintings, has the task of working on a painting that depicts a chess game between the Duke of Flanders and his knight.

During the course of her tests, she makes a startling discovery. Hidden beneath the tablecloth is a message that reads: Who killed the knight? This prompts Julia to embark on a journey to solve the mystery of a murder that occurred centuries ago.

However, things take a dark turn when murders begin to take place around Julia. Suddenly, the chess game transforms into a death threat.

Although the book started off promisingly, it ultimately left a rather strange taste in the reader's mouth. The concept of a puzzle was appealing, and I found myself following the chess game with great interest.

Unfortunately, everything else about the story made it seem strange and, in the end, uninteresting. The medieval murder is赋予了 an inexplicable importance, as if uncovering the identity of Rose d'Arras' murderer would somehow unbalance history.

The nicest character in the book is the chess player. But as the story progresses, the rest of the characters start to become boring. It seems that around the halfway point, the writer decided to prolong the story, resulting in a plethora of endless thoughts.

The whole plot becomes extravagant, and by the time you finish the book and discover what is truly happening, it all just seems exaggerated and unreal.
July 14,2025
... Show More
I really thought I would have a deep affection for Arturo Perez-Reverte's books, especially this one and \n  The Club Dumas\n. The reason being that it appeared to be a wonderful combination of art, mystery, and history. However, to my disappointment, The Flander's Panel just didn't click with me.

Perhaps it wasn't the opportune time to read it. I was in the mood for a mystery, but something rather "quick" and "fast-paced" in a sense, which this novel is not. It is quite slow and has a strong atmosphere. In fact, I really enjoyed imagining Julia's studio, picturing how messy and "cosy" it might be. I also grew fond of some of the characters, like the heroine or César, until something started to bother me a bit.

I also had a hard time with the ending. It seemed original, yet a bit far-fetched and abrupt after such a long build-up.

I will still give other books by this author a try, but this first encounter has left me with a rather bitter taste.
July 14,2025
... Show More
For me, the motivation for the crime is too unconvincing. The characters are like actors in a musical, puckering and pursing their lips.

The only bright spot is the parts about chess.

It seems that the author spent a lot of time and effort on describing the chess scenes, which are quite detailed and vivid.

However, the overall plot and character development are rather weak.

The story lacks depth and fails to engage the reader on a deeper level.

Perhaps the author could have focused more on building the characters' personalities and motives, and making the plot more complex and interesting.

In conclusion, while the parts about chess are good, the rest of the article needs improvement.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.