A really amazing life is the subject of this good book. Overall, I had a great love for it, especially the latter two-thirds. However, I will first present my negatives.
The cons: I believe the author dedicated an excessive amount of time to Che's early life compared to his political life. Additionally, I had a rather significant problem with the author's politics, which was very明显的 anti-communism, evident both here and in his writing about other Latin American leftists. This made certain parts of the book extremely infuriating.
The way he described Fidel was quite bad. He presented Fidel as being purely a force of personality who manipulated those around him, having no personal politics or beliefs, and using communism to seize power. This is in contrast to what Fidel, his friends, and political leaders have said, which is that he was a caring and charismatic person driven by compassion for the oppressed and an avowed Marxist since college. I am currently reading Fidel's book "My Life" to obtain a different perspective on this story, and it is very good.
But my least favorite aspect of this book was how the author selectively added or omitted context to support his anti-communism. For example, he provided insane detail about the USSR helping Fidel (and really, who cares if they are allowed to trade with countries?), while simply mentioning "right wing Eastern European Mercenaries", "Croatian Anti Communists", and "Recent German immigrants to Bolivia", comically avoiding the fact that these are almost all nazis and fascists hired by the US and the US-backed dictators after WW2 to help destroy communism (and they did, great job everyone, we now live in the world created by the Third Reich). I understand this is a book about Cuba, but this context is crucial when calling Fidel a tyrant or presenting this conflict as "capitalist democracy vs communist dictatorship". "Jakarta Method" and "Blackshirts & Reds" are two very good books that offer this missing context.
Otherwise, I feel that he wrote a very fair and even book. Given how controversial Che is, this was probably not an easy task. I also appreciate reading the most critical accounts I can about such matters to ensure that I know what I am supporting. After reading this, I feel quite confident in that regard, especially regarding his detailed (and I think very reasonable) coverage of the La Cabana tribunals and firing squads that gave Che his murderous reputation. Spoiler: they were mostly fine, everyone received trials, and while I don't love the death penalty, these were very bad people. Considering what happened in Guatemala, I would gladly trade 500 war criminals for the hundreds of thousands of peasants and indigenous people who were slaughtered under the right wing regimes we supported after Cuba.
As soon as the revolution occurs, this book becomes exciting and doesn't really let up. To be fair, the Cuban Revolution is thrilling, and everything I have read about it has been exciting. However, I must admit that this book is my favorite account of it so far. The detail he provided about the rebels killing the drunk slave owner is so good and genuinely funny that I even went to read about it in Che's journal.
Also, despite Anderson's best efforts, he really portrayed the rebels as romantic and fun characters that were impossible not to root for. Of course, both had their issues, and Anderson pays close attention to them here. But even with those, I found myself simply wanting to learn and read more about everyone involved in the story of the Cuban Revolution.
I think this is a great book and would absolutely recommend it, but as a companion to other readings about the Cold War, Fidel, and Cuba (all mentioned above, such as "Jakarta Method", "Blackshirts and Reds", and Fidel or Che's own writing about themselves).
Quoting the author on the last page of the epilogue... "Around the time Che's body was exhumed, a scrawl of graffiti in Spanish had appeared on the wall of the Vallegrande public telephone office. It said: Che - Alive as they never wanted you to be".
This is his legacy. And the proof is, every time we witness a social movement or demonstration anywhere in the world, his ever famous portrait hangs HIGH. They tried so hard to smear his character but to no avail. He was a man who led by example. He was a man who profoundly believed in UNIVERSAL SOCIAL JUSTICE. He was a man who refused positions of power and materialist gains. He was a man who believed that the individual by himself is worthless but being part of a successful society that had shared values and practiced social justice is PRICELESS. He was a man that faced death in the face when it took a corrupt drunkard soldier to assassinate him, saying to him, "Shoot, coward, you are only going to kill a man".
LONG LIVE CHE