The Big U

... Show More
The New York Times Book Review called Neal Stephenson's most recent novel "electrifying" and "hilarious".  but if you want to know Stephenson was doing twenty years before he wrote the epic Cryptonomicon, it's back-to-school time. Back to The Big U, that is, a hilarious send-up of American college life starring after years out of print, The Big U is required reading for anyone interested in the early work of this singular writer.

Community Reviews

Rating(4.2 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
39(39%)
4 stars
36(36%)
3 stars
24(24%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews All reviews
March 26,2025
... Show More
"What people do isn't determined by where they live. It happens to be their damned fault. They decided to watch TV instead of thinking when they were in high school. They decided to take blow-off courses and drink beer instead of reading and trying to learn something. They decided to chicken out and be intolerant bastards instead of being openminded, and finally decided to go along with their buddies and do things that were terribly wrong when there was no reason they had to. Any who hurts someone else decides to hurt them, goes out of their way to do it...The fact that it's hard to be a good person doesn't excuse going along and being an asshole. If they can't overcome their own fear of being unusual, it's not my fault, because any idiot ought to be able to see that if he just acts reasonably and makes a point of not hurting others, he'll be happier."

Uneven but somehow still consistent and surprising enough to make me keep reading. By the time Sarah Jane Johnson, the Student Government President, speaks the lines above I felt like Stephenson improved on the design of what Ballard established with n  High-Risen as an examination of what happens in enclosed space with different societal groups slowly descending into chaos. Whereas Ballard peaked early with his work, Stephenson slowly drags you along and establishes a world that reminded me of my time in college.

Much like American University, my school was downtown and close to the interstate. Although we didn't have a Plex, the towers I lived in sophomore year always seemed to be at the edge of a chaotic meltdown. However, it was my freshman year in a six-story dormitory that closely mirrored the violence of the book--my floor constantly staged boxing matches in the cramped hallways and by the end of the academic year, there were enough holes in the ceilings and walls that nearly every resident on the floor had over a $500 bill to fix the damage.

I will admit that I am guilty of everything in that above speech. My college time was mostly spent drinking or sleeping off a hangover and it is a minor surprise that I actually graduated in four years. I say minor because once the tuition check cleared, it was in the university's best interest to have me graduate so they can use me as a statistic in their recruitment efforts. Since those days, I have slowly matured as human to know only slightly better, to not view the world the foggy glasses of cheap beer, and only occasionally use my higher thinking skills for less selfish purposes such as not standing idly by when I feel a wrong has been committed (either against myself or a fellow human/animal/external element that is not me yet a part of me on a cosmic level).

That Sarah Jane Johnson has a lot of great wisdom in the book and clearly the character I most identified with. Here's another wonderful nugget:

"I don't need some terrific reason for resigning. If I'm spending time on a useless job I don't like, and I find there are better things to do with that time, then I ought to resign."

That's a statement which I am currently in the process of living out.
March 26,2025
... Show More
Первый роман Стивенсона — чуваку было сколько, 29, когда он вышел? — и совсем непонятно, почему он обойден вниманием руссоидателей, так обильно на Стивенсона фапающих (уважительная причина может быть только в том, что сам Стивенсон не дает его на русский переводить, оберегая нервную систему своих фанов, но переиздавать же дал, так что все равно непонятно).
Т.е. это конечно, не фонтастега для умных, где литературным мальчикам там приятно опознавать знакомые буквы, это натурально грубо сляпанный балаган, шизокомический эпос из студенческой жизни. Там все как бы сметано на живую нитку, но в этом и есть определенная прелесть — видно, как из автора фонтаном бьют придумки.
С виду роман — эдакий гибрид Мэтта Раффа, Линды Джейвин и Тома Шарпа, а в глубине было лень разбираться, Стивенсона я же для развлечения читаю. Ну и карнавал имени Пинчона, конечно. Здесь отлично видно, у кого на самом деле он учился писать.
March 26,2025
... Show More
A true disappointment. Ridiculous to the point of boredom. Impossible to follow characters and pointless plotlines. After stickling through to the very end, I still couldn't quite understand what the point of the book was supposed to be.
March 26,2025
... Show More
The Big U is a good indication of how much Neal Stephenson has grown in his writing. It's an early novel and in some ways it reminds me of Neil Gaiman or Terry Prachett, because it is fun reading. He makes some insightful pokes at the the corporate model of the university, and institution whose face is undergoing remarkable changes since the GI bill went through in the US. Strange because I have been reading Neuman's The Idea of the University, a rather long and ponderous essay written in the mid to late 1800's. It's a chilling shift in the concept of the university, especially in light of the idea of discontinuing tenure to purge schools of bad professors. Yet tenure was designed to give academics liberty to spak their minds without fear of termination, not necessarily to provide them with the ability to coast after publishing. I would like to read more books on this topic, fiction or non fiction, so suggestions welcome.
March 26,2025
... Show More
If you like Neal Stephenson's sense of humor and have read some of his later books, this is a rather fun look into how early that sense of humor manifested itself in his writing.

If you haven't read anything else by Stephenson and are looking for a good book, then you may be disappointed. Start with "Snowcrash" instead, and work your way forward in time from there. (Then, if you like Stephenson, "Zodiac" is fun too. It contains a quite memorable quote about people who shop in hardware stores and the kinds of clerks that might approach them that I have used to explain what I do in hardware stores many times :-))

I enjoyed it.
March 26,2025
... Show More
I may have enjoyed this if I had read it when I was closer to college age and could relate better to the satire. At this point in my life,it was just not interesting or entertaining.
March 26,2025
... Show More
While the prose comes off as smooth and entertaining at the start of the novel, and the story has good momentum and drive, the latter half of this book falls flat because it drags itself down. The prose becomes oversaturated and derivative, and the story nonsensical to the point where I'm wasn't sure exactly what I was reading anymore. I'm a big fan (heh) of Stephenson, but this was a struggle to get through for me. Some neat moments scattered throughout, but overall not something I'll think back on fondly.
March 26,2025
... Show More
I read this for "completeness" (so I could have read all of Neal Stephenson's work), even though he hates it and had tried to suppress it. Not great, not horrible; if it hadn't been a Neal Stephenson book I might not have sought out another by the same author, but it wasn't so bad to have regretted reading it. What was interesting was seeing how some of the elements (plot and character motivations, style) developed in his subsequent books.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.