...
Show More
*** Possible Spoilers ***
I expected this book to be a polemic castigating perceived white racism in North America and it was but that isn't a problem. I was hoping that Mr. West might introduce some new ideas into the discourse regarding race; but instead, he reiterated the tired old tropes that one encounters from groups such as Black Lives Matter.
Simply put, he doesn't much like whites, the 1%, Capitalism, Free Enterprise, White Nationalists, conservatives, Republicans, and Donald Trump. Interestingly, he also doesn't like Hillary Clinton, liberals, most Democrats, Obama and that subset of black people who are in the middle or upper middle class. He doesn't actually use the term 'sell-outs' to describe the latter but that seems to be his opinion. He does like Bernie Sanders although he seems to think that Mr. Sanders views don't go far enough. He likes those black people who are at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. Although he doesn't come out and state it, I received the opinion that he is a Marxist. He does describe himself as a radical-Democrat but that seems just a little vague.
I consider all this interesting because, according to the internet - so perhaps a questionable resource - Mr. West has a net worth of five-hundred thousand. Given his books, teaching at both Harvard and Princeton, his speaking engagements and entertainment roles, I suspect that is on the low side. He is certainly in the middle or upper middle class of black individuals whom he chastises as not providing adequate leadership - which means they are busy living their lives and have neither the time nor inclination to man the barricades.
To a large extent I expected much of the above when I got this book; so that, by itself, didn't disappoint me. What I didn't like - and why I rated the book with only one star - was that he seems to have found a way to use the English language in such a manner as to obfuscate rather than enlighten. Consider the following: "Like liberal structuralists, the advocates for a politics of conversion never lose sight of the structural conditions that shape the lives and sufferings of people. Yes, unlike liberal structuralism, the politics of conversion meets the nihilistic threat head on." I'm convinced there has to be a better way for him to make his point, although frankly I'm not certain just what point his is making. If this book was intended for an audience of his peers - academics within university humanities departments - I think it would be fine; however, he seems to want to address a broad audience and, frankly, this is not the way to accomplish that objective.
Those on the radical left of the political spectrum might enjoy this book although I doubt it contains much that these individuals don't already know. Beyond that, I can't think of anyone who might find it either entertaining or enlightening.
I expected this book to be a polemic castigating perceived white racism in North America and it was but that isn't a problem. I was hoping that Mr. West might introduce some new ideas into the discourse regarding race; but instead, he reiterated the tired old tropes that one encounters from groups such as Black Lives Matter.
Simply put, he doesn't much like whites, the 1%, Capitalism, Free Enterprise, White Nationalists, conservatives, Republicans, and Donald Trump. Interestingly, he also doesn't like Hillary Clinton, liberals, most Democrats, Obama and that subset of black people who are in the middle or upper middle class. He doesn't actually use the term 'sell-outs' to describe the latter but that seems to be his opinion. He does like Bernie Sanders although he seems to think that Mr. Sanders views don't go far enough. He likes those black people who are at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. Although he doesn't come out and state it, I received the opinion that he is a Marxist. He does describe himself as a radical-Democrat but that seems just a little vague.
I consider all this interesting because, according to the internet - so perhaps a questionable resource - Mr. West has a net worth of five-hundred thousand. Given his books, teaching at both Harvard and Princeton, his speaking engagements and entertainment roles, I suspect that is on the low side. He is certainly in the middle or upper middle class of black individuals whom he chastises as not providing adequate leadership - which means they are busy living their lives and have neither the time nor inclination to man the barricades.
To a large extent I expected much of the above when I got this book; so that, by itself, didn't disappoint me. What I didn't like - and why I rated the book with only one star - was that he seems to have found a way to use the English language in such a manner as to obfuscate rather than enlighten. Consider the following: "Like liberal structuralists, the advocates for a politics of conversion never lose sight of the structural conditions that shape the lives and sufferings of people. Yes, unlike liberal structuralism, the politics of conversion meets the nihilistic threat head on." I'm convinced there has to be a better way for him to make his point, although frankly I'm not certain just what point his is making. If this book was intended for an audience of his peers - academics within university humanities departments - I think it would be fine; however, he seems to want to address a broad audience and, frankly, this is not the way to accomplish that objective.
Those on the radical left of the political spectrum might enjoy this book although I doubt it contains much that these individuals don't already know. Beyond that, I can't think of anyone who might find it either entertaining or enlightening.