Unfortunately most of him points are still relevant today. I believe Prof. West is one on the best philosophers of our time.

Read several years ago. Just now entering. I should reread it but I’m busy making face masks.

clear and concise, demonstrates robust philosophical and sociopolitical diversity as well as a keen clarity toward the importance of the human soul; namely, love and passion

This is an excellent book that calls out all the evil of white supremacy and at the same time calls for a common humanity approach to tackling race issues. I highly recommend this book.

As a qualifier to this entire review, I listened to the audio book and I think that likely had a substantial impact on the reading experience. Whether for the worse or the better, I'm not entirely sure. The speaking was rather dry/monotone for the most part, which made me sleepy listening to it sometimes. Now for the content:

Dr. West goes over multiple facets of black identity and lived experience in America, opening every chapter with a reference to another black activist and something they've done or said in the past. While I don't remember any of the openings, I do remember enjoying what was said each time and it served as a reminder of the foundation black activists have built for current activists over quite some time through a variety of obstacles.

Education, work, politics, and race relations intersected often in the points made by West. Unfortunately, I didn't feel like anything really stuck. I definitely believe that, if I was black, I would have connected more with the work and remembered more. However, being a minority of a different race, I often connected with the overall sentiments and experiences West discussed, just not the specifics.

The one conversational point I do remember focused on the obstacles black academics have to deal with in America. You can rebel against the prominent institutions that provide a space for paid academic jobs at the cost of being forced to make your work more palatable to the white establishment, but that relegated you to doing mostly cheap, if not free, academic labor in smaller academic circles. This creates an ideological bubble for black academics at the top of the institutional pyramid, as well as an ideological bubble for those who reject the pyramid.

I appreciated what West had to say and think he's got a great understanding of the world, but I was not informed by this work much more than most other short form media I consume (news and articles).

The way in which Cornel West understands race is unlike anyone else. He brings a layer of honesty and nuance not commonly seen in the American race debate. While many understand race and oppression through the lens of historical, social, and structural violence, West takes these ideas a step further and presents a much more mature critique of how we talk about race in this country.

What makes West special is his willingness to not just criticize American conservatism but also critique the black community itself along with it’s allies. West’s views tend to be centered in anti imperialism and anti consumerism and it’s interesting to see how he relates the effects of these social forces to the growing loss of love and integrity he sees in America at large.

I really enjoyed this one, and as someone who is no stranger to African American philosophy, this still proved at times to be an uncomfortable reading that made me reevaluate how well I think I understand some of these issues.

The only thing I’d like to note before you read this one is that, contrary to what the title may imply, at times this book is less about explaining black oppression and more about laying a blueprint for future black leadership. This isn’t to say that if you’re white you won’t get anything out of this book, I believe I left this work better than when I started it, but it is to say that some sections are definitely more geared towards people of color rather than people trying to understand people of color. This wasn’t much of a surprise to me since I’ve read some of his other essays but this is something to know going into it.

In the end though this is an easy 5 stars. The only criticism I have is for the 25th anniversary edition, which is the one I read. This addition adds a new chapter at the beginning but after finishing I couldn’t help but feel like this new intro would have been better suited as a new epilogue at the end. Otherwise if you are wondering weather or not you should pick this one up and you’ve been interested in Cornel West’s work I highly recommend it. The perspective he gives to the reader is truly valuable and I’m very glad I got the chance to read this before my fall semester started.

While reading Cornel West Reader, I wanted to read his other material (essay format) and some parts I can easily relate to whether it was written to an audience of yesterday still is functional today. "Black people have always been in America's wilderness in search of a promised land. Yet many black folk (people) now reside in a jungle ruled by cutthroat market (US capitalism) morality devoid to any faith in deliverance or hope for freedom (page 25, Nihilism in Black America).

The essay on Malcolm X and Black Rage was pretty good (last chapter or section).

"...these desperate channels will produce a cold-hearted and mean spirited America no longer worth fighting for or living in. (116)" On page 25, West points out that Black American has always been in the wilderness seeking the promised land, except we live in a cutthroat market where morality devoid the hope for freedom, or faith. US is a capitalist country.

I am reading a copy on the shelf of C Library.
3.75/4 stars

Cornel West would probably not be offended if I pointed out that he doesn't quite have the literary talent of a W.E.B. Dubois... Who does? He doesn't have the fiery character of a Malcolm X. He comes across as someone sure of his ideas, but humble as an individual. His ideas are clear and generally well expressed, though his presentation does have a kind of dry style, like an academic essay assignment. The book does not have the kind of rigor to qualify as an analysis, and this isn't really philosophy. It's a plain-talking exposition of ideas, largely asserted or assumed, with a few explanatory examples and references to historical persons and ideas, but it isn't really argued out. Mr. West does his best to play fair by staking out ground that might bring together the right and the left, i.e. he aims to be non-partisan, though ultimately it's clear that he's coming from a Marxist perspective.

For my own purposes I'll try to note some of the controlling ideas that define the various chapters... okay, bullet points:

- The problems of black folks go beyond the narrow focus of liberals and conservatives on social structure or behavioral problems. First, it's not an either or, as structure and behavior go together and influence one another, second because cultural factors exist outside of political and economic structures... e.g., family, churches, etc., and most importantly it's time to face up to the psychological factors of lost hope and spiritual nihilism that dominate the lives of the poorest and most despairing people.

- We need love, self-respect, integrity, leadership, and values that go beyond the commercial values that have come to dominate.

- Black folks can't let the struggle simply be about getting black men the kind of power and dominance that white men have, to the detriment and neglect of black women, gay black men, and lesbians, and race identity and black nationalism can't trump moral and social issues of class, poverty, and human dignity.

- Black folks shouldn't be hornswaggled into supporting someone like Clarence Thomas who isn't qualified to serve on the supreme court, who doesn't represent black interests, who cynically plays the victim of racism to secure his own position and achieve his own ambition while condemning others for exploiting race... and support him just because of "racial reasoning"... i.e., he's black so hold together and support him, even in the face of abuse of black women (Anita Hill and Thomas's own sister whom he falsely blamed for welfare cheating...). Supporting such an unqualified individual represents an insecurity among black folks who unconsciously accept that we can't do better than this.

- Black intellectual and political leadership are at an all-time low, ironically due to the emergence of a larger black middle class (having gone from something like 7% to 25% of the black population), with the middle class seeking white acceptance and affirmation and pursuing their own individual betterment as defined by America's commercial values. Meanwhile what's really needed is community level leaders and grassroots organizers rather than leaders competing to become the voice of a national leader/savior.

- New black conservatives have emerged at least in part due to failures of liberals to directly address the real problems and to find an answer to the destructive despair and nihilism.

- Affirmative action is still supportable because racism is still real and present, the black folks who want to end affirmative action are the ones who have already benefited from it, but they want to win legitimacy among their white peers, and pragmatically, even if the issue relates more to class than race and gender, one can enforce rules that give opportunity to minorities and women, but if you just throw it down to trusting employers to use fair hiring practices with no accountability, racism and sexism can come back with a vengeance while employers claim color and gender blindness. There's no evidence to suggest racism in hiring has really abated.

- Black anti-semitism and Jewish racism against blacks are destructive to both interests, they have a long history, coalitions and cooperation should be fostered, and there are many reasons for recent conflict between Jews and blacks, including the rise of political conservatism among Jews, their opposition to affirmative action, their social and political rise in America which outstripped the rise of blacks in the same time, the failure of black leaders to strongly condemn black anti-semitism, the fact that blacks are somewhat blind to the very long history of European violent anti-semitism, plus Jews support unjust practices of Israel regarding Palestinians while blacks don't understand the Jewish sense of urgency towards self-preservation.... i.e., both blacks and Jews are caught up in racial reasoning rather than larger issues of social justice... heck there's more to this...

And, in an effort to conclude my summary by addressing the final two topics:

-Black sexuality is a taboo topic that should be addressed openly and not feared if progress is to be made. Mythology about black sexuality is damaging. Fear and fascination with black sexuality, and especially interracial sexual relations are at the core of racial conflicts. Black people confront many contradictory problems relating to how they may be degraded, or made to feel ashamed or dirty, while at the same time being objects of sexual fascination for white folks. Black folks have to be proud, not ashamed, and at the same time willing to accept a variety of expressions and sexual identities, without enforcing images of machismo on all black men. Men and women must rise together. Healthy sexual relations should be embraced whether intra-racial, inter-racial, hetero- or homosexual. At the same time, the author cautions in several places about the harmful effects of the commodification of sex, instant-gratification culture, and hedonism. Maybe I'm not getting this quite right, so I'll just quote the final thoughts on this topic from the book:

As long as black sexuality remains a taboo subject, we cannot acknowledge, examine, or engage these tragic psychocultural facts of American life. Furthermore, our refusal to do so limits our ability to confront the overwhelming realities of the AIDS epidemic in America in general and in black America in particular. Although the dynamics of black male sexuality differ from those of black female sexuality, new stylistic options of self-image and resistance can be forged only when black women and men do so together. This is not so because all black people should be heterosexual or with black partners, but rather because all black people—including black children of so-called "mixed" couples—are affected deeply by the prevailing myths of black sexuality. These myths are part of a wider network of white supremacist lies whose authority and legitimacy must be undermined. In the long run, there is simply no way out for all of us other than living out the truths we proclaim about genuine humane interaction in our psychic and sexual lives. Only by living against the grain can we keep alive the possibility that the visceral feelings about black bodies fed by racist myths and promoted by market-driven quests for stimulation do not forever render us obsessed with sexuality and fearful of each other's humanity.

-There's also a fair amount about Malcolm X. The author saw a lot of unfulfilled potential in Malcolm X, whose strong expression of rage was focused on a psychological transformation in black people, but who tragically could not live long enough to mature and examine the implications of his approach. The author saw Malcolm X as starting to transcend national boundaries, and overcoming some of the unfortunate tendency of Nation of Islam to respond to white-nationalist power by adopting the same underlying formula i.e., by focusing too much on white power, it ironically kept white culture as the dominant force and turned black nationalism into a reactionary movement. The author believed Malcolm would have gone beyond this in promoting black pride on its own terms, speaking out with appropriate rage to white abuses, but not allowing white culture to define the movement. He also commented on the fact that, still young, Malcolm in his more orthodox Muslim phase, could not yet transcend racial reasoning enough to be able to see the broader social justice issues, i.e., he could not criticize the patriarchal oppression of women and the anti-democratic culture of Arabia, while he experienced the positive humanizing experience of being accepted as a black man.

Now, this is all my sloppy effort at summarizing, I probably misrepresented something, and if you've read this far and think I got something wrong, tell me!

I had a lot of trouble deciding exactly how I was going to review this book -- Frankly, there's so much material to cover that I won't get to most of it.  First of all, I'm impressed by the density and complexity of the writing -- For that reason alone, I believe the author inherently knows what he's talking about.  I appreciate Dr. West's objective assessments of various past and present states of affairs in the USA -- As well as his overall worldview.  While I did read the entire book and also reread the first chapter ("Nihilism in Black America") -- My comments here mainly concern what I was able to glean from the prefaces, introductions and epilogue of this work.

Here are some highlights with regard to noteworthy content: (1) Imperial meltdown -- And how imperial meltdown = spiritual blackout); (1) (a) How we're living in a soulless time, in which everything has been commodified and monetized -- Particularly due to the inescapable influence of social media); (2) Bernie Sanders as a missed opportunity -- I'm in agreement with the policies promoted by Sanders, but I never voted for him, as I didn't believe he could win in a general election; (3) The grey area of commonality between Obama and Trump -- In terms of actions both presidents have taken in regard to furthering America's endless wars; (4) The obscene pentagon budget -- That could ideally be allocated to fund infrastructure, healthcare, house, education etc.

Dr. West also seems to be very open, fair and compassionate in his understanding and acceptance of the LGBTQ community (I'm saying this as a white LGBTQ person who's always felt like an outsider in the LGBTQ community) & in recognizing how problematic sexism, homophobia and patriarchal attitudes can be -- Within more conservative sectors of the African-American community.

In Closing: Here's a quote from p. ix of this work [which relates to (1) (a) above]: "The major culprit of democratic possibilities here and abroad is the ever-expanding market culture that puts everything and everyone up for sale.  The expansion of corporate power is driven by this pervasive commercialization and commodification ... Market activities of buying and selling, advertising and promoting weaken nonmarket actives of caring and sharing, nurturing and connection.  Short-term stimulation and instant titillation edge out quality relations and substantive community."

A sharp and compassionate take on race relations in the U.S. But somewhat dated.

Like a book about the geopolitical West's troubling relationship with Islam—Islamic extremism, Islamaphobia, and so on—written before September 11, 2001, it is perhaps inevitable that a book about black/white race relations in the United States written before the 2020 murder of George Floyd, as well as the second wave of the BLM movement that followed it, would seem at least somewhat outdated. These are watershed moments in the history of our culture and our politics that, though perhaps they shouldn't, change undeniably the way we use reason to make sense of them. In one of the four introductory sections contained in Cornel West's most recent edition of Race Matters—I forget which—the author, as many black leftists have done both before and since (e.g., Ibram X. Kendi, Ta-Nehisi Coates), associates the (first) presidency of Donald J. Trump with racism, xenophobia, and a political philosophy forever at odds with the—in theory, not praxis—democratic ideals of our founding fathers. It's been a little over a month since Trump was elected for a second, though non-consecutive, term. At the United States Capital, lawmakers on the left continue to interpret just about everything the dominant Republican Party does as an extension of this same political philosophy, whether we're talking about the southern border, trans people in sports, or budgetary cuts to government programs. I don't know if American politics has always been this way, but matters of social justice—of how best to use our representative democracy to, as West writes, "safeguard the rights of the minority and avoid the tyranny of the majority"—seem at this point near-ubiquitous. In other words, whether or not every left-to-right accusation of bigotry is warranted—whether or not these politicians' calls for social justice are nothing over and above unipartisan grandstanding—it is nevertheless becoming increasingly obvious that the questions of race that Cornel West was concerned about in the, I don't know, slightly better '90s are yet to be quelled.

My first exposure to West—well, aside from seeing him in The Matrix Reloaded and not realizing who he was—was from a television special hosted by the late, and truly great, Phil Donahue called The Issue of Race: A Crisis in Black and White that first aired in 1992 and—thankfully for me and thankfully for you—is available on YouTube today. (Seriously, watch it.) This special was organized like a panel discussion/debate with Phil Donahue as moderator and guest witnesses, one of whom was a rather young-looking Cornel West, invited to be "cross-examined" by the panel members and, at times, Phil Donahue himself. In this way, it sort of resembled, at least superficially, a Congressional hearing. My major takeaway from this special—try as I might, I just can't help but think polarly—is that most white progressives are in favor, at least according to their speech acts—about which Kendi might have something particularly scathing to say—of peacefully integrating with black people (i.e., coexisting), which really amounts to a kind optimism: Things are bad now, but, if we work together, they are going to get better. The response from the black community, however, is a bit more varied. There are thinkers like Malcom X and James Baldwin, whose opinions on the desirablity, let alone the practicality, of full black/white integration are, to put it euphemistically, a little less than positive. Then there are those like Martin Luther King, Jr.—nota bene: my including him here is, perhaps wrongly, based on how his ideas are often portrayed today, mostly by white commentators, which is to say I haven't (yet) read anything that King has written—or Cornel West himself, namely that the path to black flourishing in an American context is not to seize power and keep it for oneself, or one's clan, but instead to (peacefully) share it with those who already have it. In fact, according to West, the black pessimism that these days seems rather popular even among certain white progressives is just a symptom of a more pernicious black nihilism—both ultimately feeding into and reinforcing each other.

Despite West's optimism, his criticisms extend further than the race issue itself. West is a political philosopher by trade with a special interest in Marxism. For him, as they were for Marx, issues of race—despite being significant, tragic, and absolutely real—are a manifestation of a bigger problem—that is, class struggle. Race Matters is a short read, and the chapters are disjointed enough in topic to be standalone essays—many of them were published alone in various journals prior to this book's publication—but if there is any common thread that joins these discussions together, some of which touch upon black existentialism, black sex and sexuality, black indignation, affirmative action, and even the moral goodness of a kind of "bidirectional colorblindness" (though West would probably object to the term, especially as it's used today), it is that (1) aligning "the black struggle" with a hypermasculinized, heteronormative, and heterosexual archetype is antithetical to the cause of social justice, which ought to be championed by the members of any disenfranchised minority group (i.e., identity and identity-based prejudice is, to use Kimberlé Crenshaw's term, intersectional; i.e., solidarity via sympathy is better than prominence through dominance), (2) the only way to move forward is as a country unified by love and mutual respect, and (3) white democracy need not be blamed for the crimes of white capitalism. There is, then, something of both the progressive and conservative mindsets within West's approach. For instance, he is willing to concede that affirmative action is imperfect, but he would only approve of its cessation pending other socioeconomic reforms that achieve its aims more effectively. This willingness to attain synthesis through dialectic—something that also comes from Marx, via Hegel, that West cleverly likens to jazz improvisation—is an essential part of resolving the problem of social unrest by means of unabashed inviduality. Now, here, West could probably be accused of being naive—or at the very least of wanting to have his cake and eat it too. There is in this message, excluding the not-so-subtle nods to Marx, the potential for a pandering of sorts to the proverbial white lords of the realm. That said, I'm inclined to withhold such accusations, especially since I think West's point, in this book anyway, is much more nuanced than that of your, it should go without saying, standard black conservative's.

In Race Matters, Dr. Cornel West addresses a number of race-related issues with a collection of eight thought-provoking essays. Published in 1993, many of these explorations focus on case studies of the period. That said, given Dr. West’s progressive analyses and sensibilities, his preponderances were quite ahead of their time.

“Race” may be in the title, but at the heart of each of these essays lies a desire to understand and dismantle any type of unjust power imbalance. Given this framework, in addition to an overview of racism in America, this collection also offers critiques of the black community including: (in)actions to Clarence Thomas, nihilism, what Dr. West considered a lack of black leadership (in the 90s), black conservatism, anti-Semitism, and any type of self-loathing that undervalued black bodies.

"My goal is to be as bold and defiant in my criticism of any type of xenophobia, as honest and candid about the need for civil responsibility and social accountability of each of us, and as charitable and compassionate toward any political perspective from which we can gain insight and wisdom to empower us." (109)

Dr. West is undeniably an academic writer; this combined with his straight-forward honesty makes this collection a compelling read. My only critique would be that given the broad range of topics he covers, I do wish that he would have expanded a bit more upon some of these prompts. This is not to say that anything is underdeveloped, I just wish there was more material.

Overall, this is a great collection that still “matters” immensely today. I definitely recommend it.