...
Show More
This isn't really a travel book. Or, rather, it's not a pure travel book; if anything, it's a memoir in which the author's travels are a major subject, along with his experience as medical student during the sixties and his belief in 'psychic phenomena'.
Despite expecting a book solely about travels, I found the author's account of his medical experiences to be the most interesting part of the book. Many of the methods and attitudes of doctors in the sixties seem callous by contemporary standards. By contrast, the actual travel sections are more frustrating. They are too brief, to start, more vignettes than full-bodied accounts.
There's also something grating about Crichton's tendency to turn the focus of the account inwards, towards himself and his inner experiences. Rather than he focusing on the lives and culture of the locals he meets, Crichton tends to dwell on the personal lessons he drew from the incidents that occur while travelling, or, even more banal, the implications of his travels on his relationships at the time. In fact, quite a significant portion of the book is spend alluding to and dissecting the reasons for the breakdowns of Crichton's relationships with women, which often occur while travelling.
The psychic parts... to be honest I skipped these. They don't interest me. I suspect Crichton is displaying here the same contrarian streak that led him to deny climate change.
Like virtually all kids of my generation, I was obsessed with Jurassic Park, the movie. Having finished what is effectively the creator's memoir, I am a little disappointed. I found the author to be a bit self-involved and a bit overly contrarian; not unbearable, but a little grating. It was also frustrating that, despite the title, only 2/3rds of the book was actually about travels.
Despite expecting a book solely about travels, I found the author's account of his medical experiences to be the most interesting part of the book. Many of the methods and attitudes of doctors in the sixties seem callous by contemporary standards. By contrast, the actual travel sections are more frustrating. They are too brief, to start, more vignettes than full-bodied accounts.
There's also something grating about Crichton's tendency to turn the focus of the account inwards, towards himself and his inner experiences. Rather than he focusing on the lives and culture of the locals he meets, Crichton tends to dwell on the personal lessons he drew from the incidents that occur while travelling, or, even more banal, the implications of his travels on his relationships at the time. In fact, quite a significant portion of the book is spend alluding to and dissecting the reasons for the breakdowns of Crichton's relationships with women, which often occur while travelling.
The psychic parts... to be honest I skipped these. They don't interest me. I suspect Crichton is displaying here the same contrarian streak that led him to deny climate change.
Like virtually all kids of my generation, I was obsessed with Jurassic Park, the movie. Having finished what is effectively the creator's memoir, I am a little disappointed. I found the author to be a bit self-involved and a bit overly contrarian; not unbearable, but a little grating. It was also frustrating that, despite the title, only 2/3rds of the book was actually about travels.