...
Show More
Full review (below) was originally posted on The Rachel Perspective.
OVERALL . . .
I really wanted this to be good. I really did. I read it with the intention of having a good “staycation” through a book. But it just ended up reminding me that I’m not always fond of reading literature by men. It was really just a hot mess.
____________________
Michael Crichton – the literary marvel that brought us the world of Jurassic Park; the medically minded creator of ER, which was probably the greatest doctoral show of its time; the triple threat author-film director-physician who helped to shape science fiction, medical fiction, and thriller genres both on and off screen…
Michael Crichton the world traveler, the mountain hiker, the deep sea diver…
Michael Crichton the spiritual dabbler?
Yes, all are true about our Michael Crichton and his stories of the latter are at your fingertips in his 1988 non-fiction novel, Travels. Between 1965 and 1986, Travels documents Crichton’s exploits through medical school, his journey out of the medical field, and his adventures around the globe for a multitude of purposes in between. Including the few instances of mystic, psychic, spiritual awakening he took upon himself to experience.
But as great as this may sound, it is the opinion of this reviewer that he should have probably stuck to writing fiction, and likewise, we as readers should turn to those pieces of fiction when searching for Crichton’s best work.
imageWhen I began reading Travels, I found similarities between myself and Crichton when it came to travel and our general purpose for doing so. “I saw everything… I ate everything… I experienced everything” he said. We travel to not only see the world, but to learn more about ourselves and gain perspective of our lives. Furthermore, Crichton and I agree that “traveling” by reading books still “alters your mindset.” But it turns out, as I continued, that was where the similarities stopped – in their most simplified forms.
Crichton can be quoted saying that he had an “obsessive desire for experiences,” but what he had were not true experiences. He limited himself to “learning about himself, and only that.” This literature was not him understanding the cultures he so easily immersed himself into (you know, escapades that only the financially endowed can buy). His book was merely how he perceived these people and places, at face value, and in an incredibly superficial manner. As a male brain (note: I am not stereotyping all men for thinking this way), a great many of his observations were based on the attractiveness of locals, sexual desires, and/or the level of interest he was able to keep in a given location. And let me tell you, Michael Crichton is a man easily uninterested. He is a prime example of what other countries mean when discussing stereotypical American travelers, and he is the most annoying type of tourist, through and through.
Unfortunately his ventures into the metaphysical, of which there were more than I expected in a book about traveling, were not any better. For someone that purposefully put himself in so many situations involving the more supernatural aspects of life – actively visiting psychics, attending week-long seminars in the desert with healers, being self-described as “greedy for spiritual experiences” – I cannot believe how skeptical Crichton remained. Even more so, his reasons for entering into these things were incredibly foolish. The “might as well go along with it because I’m here” mentality, rather than partaking in these things because it was something he believed in, is not the right reason at all.
What I learned from Michael Crichton’s Travels was that Crichton had a bad habit of doing that a lot. I felt as though he wanted to have all of these excursions merely for the sake of saying he did them, with the off chance that he might learn something about himself. It did not feel like he truly assimilated himself into the world around him. It was more that, as a newly successful writer and director at the time, he wanted to use his new financial stability to go places (or sometimes using his profession as a method for travel).
I hate to be so critical considering his fictional works are quite good (I enjoyed reading techno-thriller Prey) and there is a tinge of remorse for criticizing an author who is no longer with us (Crichton died of lymphoma in 2008), but I want to remain an honest reviewer. And the honest truth is that I stalled out (a.k.a. did not read a word for two months) partway through Travels because, ironically similar to Crichton’s escapades, I became bored and uninterested in the material. I grappled through it because I have a personal rule of always finishing the books I start, and do so to always give books a chance to get better. This sadly, was not one of those instances.
But despite the four paragraphs stating the contrary, I give Travels a two-star rating. Dare I say it was because of the select few times he wasn’t entirely erroneous in what he said… or rather, someone he met or worked with amongst his travels said something genius to give his novel relevancy.
While filming The Great Train Robbery in Ireland, Sean Connery said “I’m here for the day, I can enjoy it or not.” A quote suitable for a life motto.
Or Brugh Joy, a physician-turned-psychic healer whom Crichton spent two weeks with for a conference, who states “[You] had the choice of finding something interesting about it or be annoyed by it, but… [you] should know [you] had a choice.”
Or furthermore, Linda, a meditation guru of sorts whom Michael met through one of his many friends, tells: “There is no drug you can take, no trip to another place in the world, no new person to have a relationship with. None of these things will get you where you want to go. What you are looking for isn’t out there. You must stop looking outside. You must go in.”
And believe it or not, Crichton wasn’t entirely without his own strokes of intellect – he not so poetically spoken, but spoken nonetheless. While in Pahang, Singapore (Malaysia), he says “It must be your city, the way we grow up in a city.” As someone who wishes to be less of a tourist when traveling, I found this quite profound; to submerge yourself and live within the location as though you’ve been there your entire life. Funny considering Crichton can say this but doesn’t necessarily follow through during his own ventures.
Or hiking Kilimanjaro, “Any route looks different going and coming.” So simple, but adequately describes how an experience can change you.
But it is the centuries-old words of ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu, quoted by Crichton (in a most confusing postscript chapter) whose words are most profound – “Existence is beyond the power of words to define.” A statement that has enough power to discredit Travels and all that Michael Crichton sought to discover through writing this book; so much so that it begs the question “why do we do it at all”?
Despite the shoddy writing and poor structure, to some extent, Travels helped to discover that. It reminded me that through travel, seeing the world instead of solely living in it, meeting people, learning from one another, understanding one another… we can at least discover more about ourselves and what we want from our lives. What makes us tick. We may not be able to define existence on a grand scale, but on a more personal one, we can at least try. Especially through travel.
OVERALL . . .
I really wanted this to be good. I really did. I read it with the intention of having a good “staycation” through a book. But it just ended up reminding me that I’m not always fond of reading literature by men. It was really just a hot mess.
____________________
Michael Crichton – the literary marvel that brought us the world of Jurassic Park; the medically minded creator of ER, which was probably the greatest doctoral show of its time; the triple threat author-film director-physician who helped to shape science fiction, medical fiction, and thriller genres both on and off screen…
Michael Crichton the world traveler, the mountain hiker, the deep sea diver…
Michael Crichton the spiritual dabbler?
Yes, all are true about our Michael Crichton and his stories of the latter are at your fingertips in his 1988 non-fiction novel, Travels. Between 1965 and 1986, Travels documents Crichton’s exploits through medical school, his journey out of the medical field, and his adventures around the globe for a multitude of purposes in between. Including the few instances of mystic, psychic, spiritual awakening he took upon himself to experience.
But as great as this may sound, it is the opinion of this reviewer that he should have probably stuck to writing fiction, and likewise, we as readers should turn to those pieces of fiction when searching for Crichton’s best work.
imageWhen I began reading Travels, I found similarities between myself and Crichton when it came to travel and our general purpose for doing so. “I saw everything… I ate everything… I experienced everything” he said. We travel to not only see the world, but to learn more about ourselves and gain perspective of our lives. Furthermore, Crichton and I agree that “traveling” by reading books still “alters your mindset.” But it turns out, as I continued, that was where the similarities stopped – in their most simplified forms.
Crichton can be quoted saying that he had an “obsessive desire for experiences,” but what he had were not true experiences. He limited himself to “learning about himself, and only that.” This literature was not him understanding the cultures he so easily immersed himself into (you know, escapades that only the financially endowed can buy). His book was merely how he perceived these people and places, at face value, and in an incredibly superficial manner. As a male brain (note: I am not stereotyping all men for thinking this way), a great many of his observations were based on the attractiveness of locals, sexual desires, and/or the level of interest he was able to keep in a given location. And let me tell you, Michael Crichton is a man easily uninterested. He is a prime example of what other countries mean when discussing stereotypical American travelers, and he is the most annoying type of tourist, through and through.
Unfortunately his ventures into the metaphysical, of which there were more than I expected in a book about traveling, were not any better. For someone that purposefully put himself in so many situations involving the more supernatural aspects of life – actively visiting psychics, attending week-long seminars in the desert with healers, being self-described as “greedy for spiritual experiences” – I cannot believe how skeptical Crichton remained. Even more so, his reasons for entering into these things were incredibly foolish. The “might as well go along with it because I’m here” mentality, rather than partaking in these things because it was something he believed in, is not the right reason at all.
What I learned from Michael Crichton’s Travels was that Crichton had a bad habit of doing that a lot. I felt as though he wanted to have all of these excursions merely for the sake of saying he did them, with the off chance that he might learn something about himself. It did not feel like he truly assimilated himself into the world around him. It was more that, as a newly successful writer and director at the time, he wanted to use his new financial stability to go places (or sometimes using his profession as a method for travel).
I hate to be so critical considering his fictional works are quite good (I enjoyed reading techno-thriller Prey) and there is a tinge of remorse for criticizing an author who is no longer with us (Crichton died of lymphoma in 2008), but I want to remain an honest reviewer. And the honest truth is that I stalled out (a.k.a. did not read a word for two months) partway through Travels because, ironically similar to Crichton’s escapades, I became bored and uninterested in the material. I grappled through it because I have a personal rule of always finishing the books I start, and do so to always give books a chance to get better. This sadly, was not one of those instances.
But despite the four paragraphs stating the contrary, I give Travels a two-star rating. Dare I say it was because of the select few times he wasn’t entirely erroneous in what he said… or rather, someone he met or worked with amongst his travels said something genius to give his novel relevancy.
While filming The Great Train Robbery in Ireland, Sean Connery said “I’m here for the day, I can enjoy it or not.” A quote suitable for a life motto.
Or Brugh Joy, a physician-turned-psychic healer whom Crichton spent two weeks with for a conference, who states “[You] had the choice of finding something interesting about it or be annoyed by it, but… [you] should know [you] had a choice.”
Or furthermore, Linda, a meditation guru of sorts whom Michael met through one of his many friends, tells: “There is no drug you can take, no trip to another place in the world, no new person to have a relationship with. None of these things will get you where you want to go. What you are looking for isn’t out there. You must stop looking outside. You must go in.”
And believe it or not, Crichton wasn’t entirely without his own strokes of intellect – he not so poetically spoken, but spoken nonetheless. While in Pahang, Singapore (Malaysia), he says “It must be your city, the way we grow up in a city.” As someone who wishes to be less of a tourist when traveling, I found this quite profound; to submerge yourself and live within the location as though you’ve been there your entire life. Funny considering Crichton can say this but doesn’t necessarily follow through during his own ventures.
Or hiking Kilimanjaro, “Any route looks different going and coming.” So simple, but adequately describes how an experience can change you.
But it is the centuries-old words of ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu, quoted by Crichton (in a most confusing postscript chapter) whose words are most profound – “Existence is beyond the power of words to define.” A statement that has enough power to discredit Travels and all that Michael Crichton sought to discover through writing this book; so much so that it begs the question “why do we do it at all”?
Despite the shoddy writing and poor structure, to some extent, Travels helped to discover that. It reminded me that through travel, seeing the world instead of solely living in it, meeting people, learning from one another, understanding one another… we can at least discover more about ourselves and what we want from our lives. What makes us tick. We may not be able to define existence on a grand scale, but on a more personal one, we can at least try. Especially through travel.