Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
34(34%)
4 stars
38(38%)
3 stars
28(28%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
Se questo è un uomo
lettura dal 09 al 15 marzo 2015
La crudeltà dei campi di concentramento non ha eguali nella storia dell'umanità, nonostante tutto ogni volta mi meraviglio ancora di come sia stato possibile per menti umane arrivare a concepire una cosa del genere. E non penso ci sia altro da dire, libri del genere non hanno bisogno di ulteriori commenti.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Una lettura sofferta, che mi ha richiesto mesi per meditare su ogni parola che leggevo, per lasciarla sedimentare. Sorprende la lucidità e l'assenza di condanna da parte dell'autore, che vuole dare testimonianza ma evitare atteggiamenti parziali per l'una o l'altra parte. E' una discesa all'inferno, seguita da una lenta risalita alla normalità. Imprescindibile
April 25,2025
... Show More
Glad to have come across these two in one volume, for The Truce is the logical continuation of If This is a Man. If one is the descent of man into the abyss, the other is his rise from the dead, from where humanity dies, back to humanity itself.n  
"There were twelve goods wagons for six hundred and fifty men; in mine we were only forty-five, but it was a small wagon. Here then, before our very eyes, under our very feet, was one of those notorious transport trains, those which never return, and of which, shuddering and always a little incredulous, we had so often heard speak. Exactly like this, detail for detail: goods wagons closed from the outside, with men, women and children pressed together without pity, like cheap merchandise, for a journey towards nothingness, a journey down there, towards the bottom. This time it is us who are inside."
n

In If This is a Man, Primo Levi is a witness. We never forget that he is actually there, in the Auschwitz camp system, at Buna-Monowitz concentration/labour camp, but he does. He is an objective bystander, reporting to us what he sees, day in and day out. Levi was there for almost a year, from February 1944, until the Soviets liberated the camp. Out of 650 Italians in his transport, only 3 returned home. Once there, Levi introduces us into the camp dynamics, who is who and how the hierarchy looks. He tells us about the ever-present hunger, about the best place in line to get the most consistent soup, about the latrines, emptying the buckets in the middle of the night, about the overcrowded barracks, the cold, the selections and the work kommandos. He does not speak of things that he did not witness, but those he did see are enough to make us question human nature and the limits of human endurance. n  
"But this was the sense, not forgotten either then or later: that precisely because the Lager was a great machine to reduce us to beasts, we must not become beasts; that even in this place one can survive, and therefore one must want to survive, to tell the story, to bear witness; and that to survive we must force ourselves to save at least the skeleton, the scaffolding, the form of civilization. We are slaves, deprived of every right, exposed to every insult, condemned to certain death, but we still possess one power, and we must defend it with all our strength for it is the last the power to refuse our consent. So we must certainly wash our faces without soap in dirty water and dry ourselves on our jackets. We must polish our shoes, not because the regulation states it, but for dignity and propriety. We must walk erect, without dragging our feet, not in homage to Prussian discipline but to remain alive, not to begin to die."
n

In his writing, Levi is methodical. He is lucid and objective. He does not embellish and he does not exaggerate. The horrors happening there speak for themselves. He does not forgive, but he also does not hate, so his story is without revolt. This does not mean that he is cold, quite the contrary: his text is warm, he obviously cares about the people he writes about, even if most of them are fleeting occurrences in his camp life. Even there he preserved his humanity, memory being the only place where he could write. n  
"We do not believe in the most obvious and facile deduction: that man is fundamentally brutal, egoistic and stupid in his conduct once every civilized institution is taken away, and that the Haftling is consequently nothing but a man without inhibitions. We believe, rather, that the only conclusion to be drawn is that in the face of driving necessity and physical disabilities many social habits and instincts are reduced to silence.
But another fact seems to us worthy of attention: there comes to light the existence of two particularly well differentiated categories among men the saved and the drowned."
n

Towards the end of his stay there, in the winter, when most prisoners die, he had the “luck” (if one can talk about luck in such circumstances) of being assigned to a chemical work commando, meaning little hard manual work in the winter cold. He was also “lucky” to be ill when the Soviets were approaching and the Nazis left the camp with all the prisoners (most died). But I think what saved him is his memory and his refusal to give in and give up. In a place where all hope dies, where there is no more humanity, he still saw glimpses of hope, of humans behaving like humans.
n  
"However little sense there may be in trying to specify why I, rather than thousands of others, managed to survive the test, I believe that it was really due to Lorenzo that I am alive today; and not so much for his material aid, as for his having constantly reminded me by his presence, by his natural and plain manner of being good, that there still existed a just world outside our own, something and someone still pure and whole, not corrupt, not savage, extraneous to hatred and terror; something difficult to define, a remote possibility of good, but for which it was worth surviving."

"Kuhn is thanking God because he has not been chosen.
Kuhn is out of his senses. Does he not see Beppo the Greek in the bunk next to him, Beppo who is twenty years old and is going to the gas-chamber the day after tomorrow and knows it and lies there looking fixedly at the light without saying anything and without even thinking anymore? Can Kuhn fail to realize that next time it will be his turn? Does Kuhn not understand that what has happened today is an abomination, which no propitiatory prayer, no pardon, no expiation by the guilty, which nothing at all in the power of man can ever clean again.
If I was God, I would spit at Kuhn's prayer."

"Hurbinek, who was three years old and perhaps had been born in Auschwitz and had never, seen a tree; Hurbinek, who had fought like a man, to the last breath, to gain his entry into the world of men, from which a bestial power had excluded him; Hurbinek, the nameless, whose tiny forearm – even his – bore the tattoo of Auschwitz; Hurbinek died in the first days of March 1945, free but not redeemed. Nothing remains of him: he bears witness through these words of mine."
n

The Truce is his journey back home, lasting almost as long as his imprisonment. He spent a lot of time in different displaced persons camps, in Katowice and then in Starye Dorogi. He travelled east, north, south, before going west, through Romania and Hungary, to Austria, Germany, and at last Italy. These are months of regaining strength and his human form, of vagabondage, of getting by or of abundance. He made friends and he describes them vividly. There are a lot of adventures and the book is more light hearted in tone, the will to live/to feel was more powerful, even in the direst situations, than the memories of Auschwitz.n  
"We had hoped for a short and safe journey, towards a camp equipped to receive us, towards an acceptable substitute for our homes; and this hope formed part of a far greater hope, that of an upright and just world, miraculously re-established on its natural foundations after an eternity of upheavals, of errors and massacres, after our long patient wait. It was a naive hope, like all those that rest on too sharp a division between good and evil, between past and future, but it was on this that we were living. That first crack, and the other inevitable ones, small and large, that followed it, were for us a cause of grief, the more hardly felt because they were unforeseen; for one does not dream for years, for decades, of a better world, without representing it as perfect."
n

The first book is sad and tragic. Primo Levi does not hate, but I do. He does not point fingers, but I do. He doesn’t need to revolt, because the reader does. It is hard to read, to comprehend, to process and to let go. The second book is comforting, for we all want for happy ends, even if we have to rethink the definition of happiness.
n  
"We felt we had something to say, enormous things to say, to every single German, and we felt that every German should have something to say to us; we felt an urgent need to settle our accounts, to ask, explain and comment, like chess players at the end of a game. Did ‘they* know about Auschwitz, about the silent daily massacre, a step away from their doors? If they did, how could they walk about, return home and look at their children, cross the threshold of a church? If they did not, they ought, as a sacred duty, to listen, to learn everything, immediately, from us, from me; I felt the tattooed number on my arm burning like a sore."
n
April 25,2025
... Show More
This should be required reading in today's increasingly populist world. Tinpot demagogues are seeking to prey on the socially and economically disadvantaged by exploiting fears and resentments against foreigners and minorities. It's happened before and Primo Levi gave us an excellent description of what the results were.
Anyone who has been to a concentration camp site comes away with a desolate feeling: part shame, part anger, part sadness. However we are just day visitors and have no concept of what it was like to be a Häftling. Levi describes it in almost clinically simple and unemotional prose, carefully letting the events speak for themselves rather than indulging in what would be perfectly justifiable emotional rants against the Germans or even playing the victim. This is powerful because it forces us to confront the simple, awful day to day reality and also conveys to us the total removal of hope, of emotion, of humanity by the camp system. Levi survived - just one of 3 out of the 650 in his convoy - not because he was special, or especially skillful or anything else controllable. His survival was pure chance.

I found I read avidly, desperate for each of the two books to end, not because I wanted to finish the books, but because I wanted his trials to end; first the end of his imprisonment and then the final return to his home. Of course it didn't end there, he bore the physical and emotional scars forever, but for the reader there's a "happy" ending. Except of course for the millions who never returned, ever.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Um retrato na primeira pessoa, nu e cru da passagem de Primo Levi por Auschwitz.

Nesta leitura não há um antes e um depois, nao há texto acessório, não há uma tentativa de embelezamento da escrita, somente um relato dos acontecimentos decorridos através dos olhos do autor.

Se isto é um homem...
April 25,2025
... Show More
4.5/5
n  'Hier ist kein warum' (there is no why here)

It was a naïve hope, like all those that rest on too sharp a division between good and evil, between past and future, but it was on this that we were living.
n
For reasons obvious to those who have been paying attention, I've been focusing more on Jewish people in my reading than I had been previously. This particular dearth in the past has everything to do with my continued fumbling through the biases of my appetites when it comes to the written word, as sweeping through and categorizing my shelves with the labels of 'people of color' and 'women' left no room for what antisemitism has wrought for millennia. The United States is no Europe, but when looking to its regional history, the concrete if seemingly disparate existences of a settler state, slavery (still legal if one is incarcerated), concentration camps (try 'immigration detention' on for size), the MS St. Louis, WASPS, Catholics, eugenics, and the El Paso 'disinfection' plant make for a potential that, in the century of the drone and the DNA databases, beats the best of both dystopia and science-fiction. There is no 'if' here. There is only a when.
n  In every part of the world, wherever you begin by denying the fundamental liberties of [humanity], and equality among people, you move toward the concentration camp system, and it is a road on which it is difficult to halt.

He told me his story, and today I have forgotten it, but it was certainly a sorrowful, cruel and moving story; because so are all our stories, hundreds of thousands of stories, all different and all full of a tragic, disturbing necessity. We tell them to each other in the evening, and they take place in Norway, Italy, Algeria, and the Ukraine, and are simple and incomprehensible like the stories in the Bible., But are they not themselves stories of a new Bible?
n
If humanity ever figures out a way in which to manipulate a brain into never forgetting without resort to externalized processors, it won't be without breaking most, if not all, of the other functions the average neurotypical takes for granted. As such, I don't understand how Levi remembered all that he did, in such detail, in such times. Research and cross collaboration were not forbidden once a semblance of home had been achieved once again, of course, but as the author stated many times, the vast majority of those who shared his story are dead, and not every survivor wishes to remember what they survived.
n  Now I do not know Polish, but I know how one says 'Jew' and how one says 'political'; and I soon realized that the translation of my account, although sympathetic, was not faithful to it. The lawyer described me to the public not as an Italian Jew, but as an Italian political prisoner.
I asked him why, amazed and almost offended. He replied, embarrassed: 'C'est mieux pour vous. La guerre n'est pas finie.'

[O]nly at first glance does it seem paradoxical that people who rebel are those who suffer the least. Even outside the camps, struggles are rarely waged by Lumpenproletariat. People in rags do not revolt.
n
This isn't a handbook of how to combat what its pages contain in the future. Nor is it a model or an ultimate say on one of the many mass annihilation that have occurred since the time human beings evolved enough to segregate themselves and define the other as a worthy target of extermination. Primo Levi himself says he survived by chance, and so these writings, much as all writings are in the days of academic stagnation and capitalistic popularity contests (it took If This Is a Man eleven years and a republication to become what it is recognized as today), are beholden to chance, if perhaps in higher than average measure when the journey of the author is taken into account. The fact that he chose to target specific mythologies in his afterword (examples being the rise of the angry masses and the lack of courage of Jewish people) arose from even more chance, wherein audiences asked questions about certain topics and Levi responded to a certain few of those questions. Put together, you don't get the finale of the trilogy The Drowned and the Saved, or Levi watching the German translation and publication like a hawk, or his final years before he passed. What you get is a text written before decades of simplification into a trope wiped away the fact that the United States waging war against the Nazis was birthed out of chance, not a sizable difference in ideologies. Simply put, the clues are all there. All that is needed is the murder.
n  They were "charismatic leaders"; they possessed a secret power of seduction that did not proceed from the credibility or the soundness of the things they said but from the suggestive way in which they said them, from their eloquence, from their histrionic art, perhaps instinctive, perhaps patiently learned and practiced. The ideas they proclaimed were not always the same and were, in general, aberrant or silly or cruel. And yet they were acclaimed with hosannahs and followed to the death by millions of the faithful.n
The knocked off half star is for the characterization of various evils and uncanny survival mechanisms as 'madness'. You can get mad at me for it right after you look up "the elimination of the incurably ill", "T-4", Bishop Clemens August Graf von Galen of Muenster, and euthanasia of disabled people up until the present day. In any case, it is not impossible to be both Jewish and disabled. Writings that reject such that occurred during the body of the memoirs, sunk into the present as they are, would have been understandable. Re-occurrences as a final conclusion in the afterword, written long after the diverse background of those condemned to the crematories had been revealed, are dangerously obtuse. As such, I recommend this book to those who are willing to learn from history, but do not equate it to swallowing any particularly history whole.
n  All the same I would not want my abstaining from explicit judgment to be confused with an indiscriminate pardon. No, I have not forgiven any of the culprits, nor am I willing to forgive a single one of them, unless he has shown (with deeds, not words, and not too long afterward) that he has become conscious of the crimes and errors of Italian and foreign Fascism and is determined to condemn them, uproot them, from his conscience and from that of others. Only in this case am I, a non-Christian, prepared to follow the Jewish and Christian precept of forgiving my enemy, because an enemy who sees the error of his ways ceases to be an enemy.n
April 25,2025
... Show More
šausmīgi baisi cik pragmatisks, precīzs un neemocionāls ir šis pārstāstījums par nometnēs notiekošo
piekrītu levī teiktajam, ka baisākais punkts būs tas, kad mēs aizmirsīsim tās šausmas, kas tur notika
tāpēc arī ir vērts šo lasīt
kā arī viņa brīnišķigā rakstības spēja
April 25,2025
... Show More
In the post notes at the end of the book Levi describes how he has elucidated his experience in the camp of Monowitz perfectly, which is a combination of a detached, often objective view of events so as not to condemn any one person or group but keeping in mind to include his own tragic and desperate feelings where necessary.

The first half I found incredibly difficult to maintain reading and digesting, even as much as 5 or 6 pages became full of anguish and horror at what he was made to endure and observe others around him doing, even in his objective way of writing. His description of the type of men who have 'lost their Being' or respond emotionally to nothing, who accept all punishment, who have in essence given up and lose themselves is harrowing - the experience of the timber plank landing on his foot due to the carelessness of the man in front springs to mind.

When Levi writes about the marches they all took and how glorious ephemeral moments could be, that being in their situation there was always something they could wonder at, be grateful for, such as the glimpse of a mountain they hadn't seen for weeks on a bright day was heart-warming to read.

I took all of it in and found the second half of the book 'The Truce' so engaging and easy to follow, willing the characters on and constantly being amazed at Primo Levi ingenuity and passion for life. It's quite a shock to find out about his passing years later, when he'd returned to Italy and I had to look into that further. It seems to those who were closest, who knew him the most intimately that this wasn't a tragic, unexpected end but in harmony with the path he'd envisioned for himself from the moment he'd chosen to share his experience with the world and himself.
April 25,2025
... Show More
If I could I would make this book required reading for everyone over 18. It's not that long and it's not that depressing. Levi recounts events that must not be forgotten, but he does so with a spirit and humanity that I have never found in other prisoner of war type stories.
April 25,2025
... Show More
To give this book any kind of rating seems superficial and besides the point of this moving testimony. Levi’s experiences are painstaking and gut-wrenching. While this wasn’t a pleasant read, it was extremely insightful and an important commemoration of the horrors we have a tendency to gloss over. Yes, we had victory in the war but ‘to deny the Holocaust is to kill the victims a second time.’
A powerful read which I would recommend.
April 25,2025
... Show More
This isn't really a book that can be rated. However, since that's how we catalogue our books here on Good Reads, I'm giving it 4 stars - not 5, but just because I wouldn't want to read it again and I can't honestly say it's one of my favourite ever books. Otherwise it's 10 stars.

I was going to start this review with quotes from the book. However, after telling my Mother how good it was when she called round this afternoon, she appears to have left with it. I text her that its like living in Auschwitz, not being able to put anything down without it being stolen. Obviously a direct comparison with life in the camp.

So how do you review a book like this? If you pick it up, or think of picking it up, or even decide not to try it, I think that decision is based on the content. A book about a concentration camp survivor is never going to be light reading and some people don't want to tackle such heavy topics. Understandably so.

If you choose to read this, then you know what sort of book you're getting into from the outset. You're reading because you want to learn more. Yet what if it doesn't interest you? The introduction of my edition said something along the lines of there being a danger that people not only forget, but become complacent when talking about the holocaust. Everyone in this day and age knows what occurred and so much has been said about the war and concentration camps, that I think we become immune to the horror. We know what happened, we know that many died, we know it was horrific. So why read about it? In Primo Levi's words -

“It is neither easy nor agreeable to dredge this abyss of viciousness, and yet I think it must be done, because what could be perpetrated yesterday could be attempted again tomorrow, could overwhelm us and our children. One is tempted to turn away with a grimace and close one's mind: this is a temptation one must resist"

Yes this book is one man's memoir of 11 months spent in Auschwitz and the follow up story of his long journey home, but it is more than this. Primo Levi purposely wrote with an impassioned voice, so that he could document a true account of conditions, without seeming emotionally biased. He wrote 'If This is Man' within the first year of returning home. Why he decided to write and how he was able to do this, is amazing in every sense of the word. He was not a writer, but a chemist, yet the writing style in this book is extraordinarily beautiful and eloquent. If you have read it, I suspect that you found it tough going at times, it's not a book that can be skipped through in one sitting.

If you haven't read it, for whatever reason. Here's some points that I hope encourage you to pick it up

- The chapters are nice small bite sized chunks
- While harrowing in content, it is not gratuitously graphic
- The writing style is beautiful
- There are interesting facts about camp life, not usually documented
- Characters are well written and fascinating

The second part of the book, Levi's return journey, is an aspect that I had not read about before. I knew that many people were stranded in camps after the war, but the journey home, documented in The Truce, was of a more mammoth undertaking than I had considered. In fact for many of the miraculous survivors, this next stage was even more hellish than the camps.

This book was gruelling to read at times. It was also fascinating, educating, heartbreaking and absorbing, to name but a few adjectives. I would recommend the first story - If This is Man - to everyone who is human. To those who want to know more, continue by reading The Truce.

I want to end with my favourite and most thought provoking passage from the book. I found the quote on GoodReads and 'liked' it, which doesn't seem to quite do it justice -

“It is lucky that it is not windy today. Strange, how in some way one always has the impression of being fortunate, how some chance happening, perhaps infinitesimal, stops us crossing the threshold of despair and allows us to live. It is raining, but it is not windy. Or else, it is raining and it is also windy: but you know that this evening it is your turn for the supplement of soup, so that even today you find the strength to reach the evening. Or it is raining, windy and you have the usual hunger, and then you think that if you really had to, if you really felt nothing in your heart but suffering and tedium - as sometimes happens, when you really seem to lie on the bottom - well, even in that case, at any moment you want you could always go and touch the electric wire-fence, or throw yourself under the shunting trains, and then it would stop raining.”
― Primo Levi, If This Is a Man / The Truce
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.