Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
36(36%)
4 stars
33(33%)
3 stars
31(31%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
The saddest and funniest Rushdie book I’ve read yet. Heart breaking and thought provoking. Wouldn’t recommend if you’re a first time Rushdie reader but if you loved midnights children you will love this too
April 17,2025
... Show More
ovvero storia del pagliaccio che si nasconde nel fanatico religioso

Shalimar il Clown è la storia della nascita del terrorismo jihadista nel Kashmir, terra di confine prima invasa dai soldati indiani, che stuprano come se non ci fosse niente di meglio per piegare una popolazione, e poi "difeso" dai fondamentalisti islamici, provenienti dal Pakistan, che trasformano una terra di pace e coesistenza in una roccaforte del terrorismo e lasciano le stesse macerie dell'esercito indiano...
il racconto è incentrato su una storia di tradimenti coniugali, impensabili là molto più che nel resto del mondo, e sul destino di un popolo che si piega per non spezzarsi e a metà strada si perde e finisce per scomparire...una storia dura, bella e dolorosa...come il destino triste di quell'area geografica...

consigliatissimo a chi non si fida più del telegiornale della sera e vuole davvero capire
April 17,2025
... Show More
Oh my that was good. I might be addicted to partition literature

Slow burn a bit, took me >1 month to get through the first 200 pages once semester started and then finished it within a couple days
April 17,2025
... Show More
At times, this rambling, rambunctious rollercoaster of a read is feathered by the genius seen in Rushdie's Midnight's Children, at other times it becomes mired in an overload of Indian/Pakistani/Kashmiri political history, which is great for providing context but stems the otherwise rampant flow of this terrific story.
As you would expect from the great man, the humour is irreverent and the human imagery transcendent. To offset this, there is pathos-a-plenty and at times the story is unbearably heart-rending.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Access: Borrowed from my sister

Abandoned Ship: Page 150/398 (37% complete)

I'm deeply sorry Rachel, I couldn't do it. I'm frustrated at myself for not having pushed my way through, but I simply wasn't invested any longer. This one just isn't for me.

There's no denying Rushdie's literary excellence. His body of work and uniquely refined voice are inescapable within the fiction community - with good reason. He's known for his hyperverbal, omniscient approach to controversial topics; I'm generally an advocate for writers willing to push the envelope. Despite this, his ambling, poetic musings are doled in spoonfuls too large to swallow comfortably. If every sentence is a painting, then I've lost sight of the forest for trees. Therein lies the first of my very particular gripes. I'm generally welcoming to meandering asides and plot deviations as a means to colour the world which I briefly occupy (my love for Pynchon being the most glaring example). Yet in the case of Shalimar the Clown, these digressions completely overpower the narrative until the story itself becomes an afterthought. Pages upon pages of Kashmiri history, village politics, and characterisations of ancillary figures who only pass through briefly - it's smotheringly tedious. Perhaps this is the product of my own highly westernised worldview, but the Kashmiri experience was so far removed from anything I could call "relatable", that my only devotion was to the central story. That story was but a small fragment of this multigenerational whole.

For an early-aughts publication, this novel felt unexpectedly dated. I do lend credence to the fact that our 2019 social climate is fundamentally different from the one he experienced while writing this story. And yet I was surprised that a novelist known for progressive inclusivity would entertain such antiquated themes and plot mechanics. The lover-centric revenge tale with men fighting over their "prize"; the western saviour to the exotic object of foreign desire. Rushdie, we are well beyond the era of Shakespearian narrative elements. What are you doing propagating these moth-eaten ideas?

TL;DR: I haven't given up on Rushdie entirely. But the intersection between a familiar story and irritating writing style alienated me from this revered novel. I wish I was in the majority on this one, but who am I performing for?

50

Notable Passages:

The world he knew was disappearing; this blind, inky night was the incontestable sign of the times. [Page 88]

[It] didn't begin to satisfy her hunger, her ravenous longing for something she could not yet name, and that as she grew older her life's insufficiency would only grow harder and more painful to bear. [Page 114]

...get me away from here, away from my father, away from this slow death and slower life, away from Shalimar the clown [Page 115]
April 17,2025
... Show More
Love it.
From the story of the Village, the banquets, the theater and dances that seem so magical. The town rivalries.
The Sad story of Boonyi. The even sadder story of Shalimar.
The different point of view of the conflict, and how it turned everyones lifes around.
The descriptions, the characters.
Everything is told in such an amazing, close, detailed way that you can see and feel the paradise that once was, the pain, the sadness, the anger.

---------------------


Maravilloso
Desde la historia del pueblo , los banquetes, las representaciones teatrales tan magicas. La rivalidad de los pueblos.
La triste historia de Boonyi, y la aun mas tragica de Shalimar.
Los diferentes puntos de vista del conflicto, y el como transforma la vida de todos los involucrados.
Las descripciones, las historias detras de cada personaje, el desenvolvimiento en el tiempo.
Todo narrado de una forma tan maravillosa, tan cercana, tan detallada que uno puede ver y sentir el paraiso que alguna vez fue, el dolor de los personajes, su tristeza y soledad, y hasta su ira.

Perfecto
April 17,2025
... Show More
I honestly think that it would have been much better if I purchased the audiobook instead of reading with my eyes. I thought the story to be intriguing, but by the end of the novel I found myself not really caring for it at all.

The reason why I think I should have opted for audio was the struggle I had with Rushdie's writing style. I know he is of Indian descent, and I think it's evident in his style. It's just not something I'm familiar with at all - I'm completely new to it. When I first picked it up, I thought it was unique. The style was something I'd never seen before and wanted to give him a chance. But after completing the book, I found the style to be really clunky and (at times) difficult to follow. Maybe if I immersed myself in a similar novel by a different writer, I might be used to it and will enjoy it more.

I also think that this story would have been even better as a film. It might translate better.
April 17,2025
... Show More
SO GOOD. Everything about the book is so good. It reads like poetry, I definitely felt a rhythm. It's my first Rushdie since I DNFed Satanic Verses out of sheer boredom, but I'm so very glad I picked it up. But also, who dies?
April 17,2025
... Show More
Може хтось і читає цю книжку, як історії кохання та ненависті, але для мене це книжка про війну, жорстоку, братовбивчу, страшну...
Шаліман ве��е свою особисту війну, яка розгортається на тлі війни у Кашмірі. І у цій війні немає переможців, а лише руїна як окемої людини, так і цілого села і всього Кашміру.
April 17,2025
... Show More

Like some of the post-9/11 literature, Shalimar delves deep into the roots of terrorism and explores the turmoil generated by different faiths and cultures attempting to coexist. How can nations, Rushdie asks, go from near-peaceful ethnic and religious acceptance to violent conflict within a mere generation? Critics agree that Rushdie has brilliantly unraveled the construction of terrorists: some of them fight for ideas; others fight to fulfill vows or, if they are men, to reclaim their wives.

Shalimar is at once a political thriller, folk tale, slapstick comedy, wartime adventure, and work of science fiction, pop culture, and magical realism. In shimmering (if sometimes baroque) language, Rushdie invokes clever satire and imaginative wordplay. Yet, despite its diverse genres and styles, Shalimar is, at heart, a story of love, honor, and revenge__and the global consequences of such emotions and actions. Critics particularly praised Rushdie's shocking description of Shalimar's transformation into a cold-blooded Islamic terrorist, from his participation in training camps to forced humiliations before Taliban leaders. Similarly, wrenching descriptions of pre- and post-war Kashmir, his homage to a paradise lost, confirm Rushdie's brilliant powers of observation and keen social insight. Some reviewers felt that some characters lacked psychological depth or complete plausibility, or were too allegorical, but most described Shalimar as convincingly real__too real, even.

In the 21st century, Shalimar

April 17,2025
... Show More
Shalimar the Clown is Rushdie at his original best. This is why I fell in love with his stories. This is why he is my favorite author.

Shalimar the clown, in trademark Rushdie style, weaves an entire region's history with the interesting lives of his fictional characters. I love how it paints a complete picture of Kashmir: one of the most complicated geopolitical zones of conflict. I am amazed, once again, how Rushdie is able to infuse humor and immersive entertainment into the narration of a difficult history. It's the best fictional stories with the "theme" of Kashmir I've read.

The magical realism, also doesn't fail to disappoint. It's much less "magical" than some of Rushdie's other stories, but his larger-than-life storytelling makes the story seem fantastically competing. Yet, it delivers the necessary impact and head-scratching questions of the Kashmir situation.

The characters are very three-dimensional, almost as if they breathe their lives out of the page. The change in the characters' morality is also handled rather well. Along with Shame and Midnights Children, I'm convinced this is one of Rushdie's best. His terrific trio, if you must, of historical and surreal stories set in the Indian subcontinent.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Truly excellent. I think it's my favorite of his. I think it might also be his best. Most people will probably disagree with me, but I just loved it. It was, perhaps, simpler in style than Midnight's Children or Satanic Verses or even The Ground Beneath her Feet, but this didn't bug me as it did with Fury. He's managed here to capture the best and worst of humans, and how people transform as they grow old, and how they can't escape this. Rushdie also does an excellent job of making truly unsavory people likable (the Filipino terrorist, the Blood King, and even Shalimar). And people I started out liking (Peggy/the Gray Rat, for example)became loathsome by the end (and I guess this goes to one of his Big Themes: betrayed people get ugly).

As usual, the parallels between characters were artful, and again I got all English-major excited about its intertextuality (the second sight of India and the Ground characters...). I kept expecting funtoosh to show up. Also, as usual, his little word trips got on my nerves, but this is always a minor complaint.

A few parts especially struck me with their beauty. Oddly enough, all three were violent, but the writing was amazing:

1) The "why was that?" passage.
2)The crackdown on Pachigam. The repetition was so skillful; I was blown away. Also, "brutality is brutality and excess is excess and that's all there is to it," and "Third and final attempt:the beautiful village of Pachigam still exists" were perfect.
3)Their characters were not not their destinies" was so simple but ended the page with a thud.

This is a gorgeous, violent book.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.