...
Show More
Disclaimer: As ever, this is just my personal opinion and the way this book strikes me. I'm reiterating that because I don't want anybody else who loves EoNM to read this mini-review and then get that depressing feeling we're all prone to when someone bashes a story we love. I'm not trying to insinuate that you shouldn't love this book if you do.
But I do just have to say, for myself . . . Fam. Uh-uh.
When I first read EoNM as a tween, I loved it. Couldn't put it down. Felt so much more kinship with Emily than with Anne. But now, several years later, my feelings have definitely changed.
This book is positively dripping with superiority complexes and pride of family (which latter, by the by, is simply asinine and I can't even with how ridiculous it is). It reinforces Montgomery's tendency to assign value to secondary characters based on whether or not her heroines happen to approve of them. And it practically slaps you in the face every other page with the "Starry-Eyed and Elfin Wunderkind the Likes of Whom Nobody Has Ever Before Encountered Because They're So Fantastically Unique™" trope. But, see, the problem with trying to apply that trope to Emily Byrd Starr is that she's kind of a vain, spoiled, prideful, entitled little brat. Like, I hate to side with Aunt Elizabeth and to say bad things about Douglas Starr, but . . . her ego really is petted by him more than it should be.
Anyway. Again, just my personal interpretation, but it's no longer "a yes from me". (I got the other two books in the trilogy from the library and I'm going to try them in the hopes that some of Emily's rather glaring flaws are addressed more satisfactorily than in the first.)
But I do just have to say, for myself . . . Fam. Uh-uh.
When I first read EoNM as a tween, I loved it. Couldn't put it down. Felt so much more kinship with Emily than with Anne. But now, several years later, my feelings have definitely changed.
This book is positively dripping with superiority complexes and pride of family (which latter, by the by, is simply asinine and I can't even with how ridiculous it is). It reinforces Montgomery's tendency to assign value to secondary characters based on whether or not her heroines happen to approve of them. And it practically slaps you in the face every other page with the "Starry-Eyed and Elfin Wunderkind the Likes of Whom Nobody Has Ever Before Encountered Because They're So Fantastically Unique™" trope. But, see, the problem with trying to apply that trope to Emily Byrd Starr is that she's kind of a vain, spoiled, prideful, entitled little brat. Like, I hate to side with Aunt Elizabeth and to say bad things about Douglas Starr, but . . . her ego really is petted by him more than it should be.
Anyway. Again, just my personal interpretation, but it's no longer "a yes from me". (I got the other two books in the trilogy from the library and I'm going to try them in the hopes that some of Emily's rather glaring flaws are addressed more satisfactorily than in the first.)