Barnaby Rudge

... Show More
Charles Dickens’s first historical novel–set during the anti-Catholic riots of 1780–is an unparalleled portrayal of the terror of a rampaging mob, seen through the eyes of the individuals swept up in the chaos. Those individuals include Emma, a Catholic, and Edward, a Protestant, whose forbidden love weaves through the heart of the story; and the simpleminded Barnaby, one of the riot leaders, whose fate is tied to a mysterious murder and whose beloved pet raven, Grip, embodies the mystical power of innocence. The story encompasses both the rarified aristocratic world and the volatile streets and nightmarish underbelly of London, which Dickens characteristically portrays in vivid, pulsating detail. But the real focus of the book is on the riots themselves, depicted with an extraordinary energy and redolent of the dangers, the mindlessness, and the possibilities–both beneficial and brutal–of the mob. One of the lesser-known novels, Barnaby Rudge is nonetheless among the most brilliant–and most terrifying–in Dickens’s oeuvre.

730 pages, Hardcover

First published July 21,1841

This edition

Format
730 pages, Hardcover
Published
November 8, 2005 by Everyman's Library
ISBN
9780307262905
ASIN
0307262901
Language
English
Characters More characters

About the author

... Show More
Charles John Huffam Dickens (1812-1870) was a writer and social critic who created some of the world's best-known fictional characters and is regarded as the greatest novelist of the Victorian era. His works enjoyed unprecedented popularity during his lifetime, and by the twentieth century critics and scholars had recognised him as a literary genius. His novels and short stories enjoy lasting popularity.

Dickens left school to work in a factory when his father was incarcerated in a debtors' prison. Despite his lack of formal education, he edited a weekly journal for 20 years, wrote 15 novels, five novellas, hundreds of short stories and non-fiction articles, lectured and performed extensively, was an indefatigable letter writer, and campaigned vigorously for children's rights, education, and other social reforms.

Dickens was regarded as the literary colossus of his age. His 1843 novella, A Christmas Carol, remains popular and continues to inspire adaptations in every artistic genre. Oliver Twist and Great Expectations are also frequently adapted, and, like many of his novels, evoke images of early Victorian London. His 1859 novel, A Tale of Two Cities, set in London and Paris, is his best-known work of historical fiction. Dickens's creative genius has been praised by fellow writers—from Leo Tolstoy to George Orwell and G. K. Chesterton—for its realism, comedy, prose style, unique characterisations, and social criticism. On the other hand, Oscar Wilde, Henry James, and Virginia Woolf complained of a lack of psychological depth, loose writing, and a vein of saccharine sentimentalism. The term Dickensian is used to describe something that is reminiscent of Dickens and his writings, such as poor social conditions or comically repulsive characters.

On 8 June 1870, Dickens suffered another stroke at his home after a full day's work on Edwin Drood. He never regained consciousness, and the next day he died at Gad's Hill Place. Contrary to his wish to be buried at Rochester Cathedral "in an inexpensive, unostentatious, and strictly private manner," he was laid to rest in the Poets' Corner of Westminster Abbey. A printed epitaph circulated at the time of the funeral reads: "To the Memory of Charles Dickens (England's most popular author) who died at his residence, Higham, near Rochester, Kent, 9 June 1870, aged 58 years. He was a sympathiser with the poor, the suffering, and the oppressed; and by his death, one of England's greatest writers is lost to the world." His last words were: "On the ground", in response to his sister-in-law Georgina's request that he lie down.

(from Wikipedia)

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
32(32%)
4 stars
37(37%)
3 stars
30(30%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews All reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
"Generally considered," used in the context of critical evaluation to label an author's work, can be a hindrance, a burden. "Barnaby Rudge" has worn that tag in the Charles Dickens canon for a long time: as in, generally considered the least-liked and, hence, the most neglected of the author's work. For me, that designation is unfortunate and, well, not accurate. Though it hardly can be lumped in with Dickens' very best work, the novel certainly is not my least favorite (that would be "The Old Curiosity Shop"), and of the 11 Dickens novels I've read so far, probably four I enjoyed less than "Rudge."

Dickens here goes back more than 60 years to 1775-80, the anti-Catholic Gordon Riots ('80) the centerpiece. You wouldn't dream of the historical-novel aspect of "Rudge" for the first third, however. There's nary a hint that the riots would ever appear, and the book is instead up to this time a rather lean, very effective look at young people, their loves (or not; you might have to wait for it) and the machinations of their families. The shift to a socially relevant, historical tone is jarring, and when that happens the book becomes far less consistent, though its highs — the various riot scenes contain some of Dickens' best writing — are very high indeed.

The lack of a true main character — though this isn't the only Dickens novel with this flaw — doesn't help, and though there are nice touches all around and things are wrapped up satisfactorily, the conclusion lacks excitement and the plot after the riots are over does limp a little. And the constraints of the times don't allow Dickens to really get to the bottom of the Protestant-Catholic animosity.

But I've got to bump this up to four stars; "Barnaby" has been held down so long he deserves an arm around his shoulder. Though many people consider "Martin Chuzzlewit" or even later novels to be the beginning of the more mature Dickens, that might just start right here. And if you're seeking out this book (it's the toughest Dickens novel to find), make sure you get an illustrated version. I think "Rudge" was the most-illustrated (70-plus, I think) of Dickens' novels. The latest Penguin edition — as usual — is a great choice.
April 17,2025
... Show More
A Dickens that's read fairly infrequently compared to some of his other, more popular offerings. And yet his trademark eye for wit, humour and droll characterisation is here, along with his unerring talent with villains. When I first read this years ago I was astonished at the Gordon Riots, I'd never heard of them before. On this reread I found it even more thrillingly horrifying. I'm sure I'll reread this in time and become engrossed it all over again.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Reši tako čovek da pročita neke knjige koje je čuvao dugo u rezervi i razočara se.
Barnabi Radž za mene je bio poslednji nepročitani Dikensov roman i čuvala sam to čitanje ne znam ni ja koliko godina. I onda paf, ništa.
Dobro, deo razočaranja, manji, potiče od toga što sam nekad nekako prespojila neke podatke (koje li?) i decenijama bila ubeđena da je Barnabi iz romana čamdžija s Temze koji vadi leševe iz reke i ima lepu ćerku. Pojma nemam s čime sam to pobrkala ali, budimo realni, to nešto drugo sigurno je bilo bolje.
Pravi Dikensov Barnabi je blag i dobar momak s posebnim potrebama, pitomim gavranom koji govori i nežnom majkom koja čuva strašnu tajnu. I sporedni lik u knjizi. Glavni lik je zapravo londonska rulja koja je izazvala tzv. Gordonove nerede i divljala po Londonu krajem osamnaestog veka. Dikens to centralno zbivanje garnira nekim nažalost ne mnogo privlačnim ljubavnim pričama, dvema-trima spletkama i jednim kao misterioznim ubistvom iz prošlosti. I ništa od toga nije na nivou najboljeg Dikensa, pa ni njegove generalno najjače strane, socijalna kritika, komika i retorički uzleti. Ima nekih trenutaka pri kraju - poslednji sati osuđenika na smrt - ali sve je, zapravo, u njegovim drugim romanima mnogo bolje izvedeno i jadan Barnabi je s danas s pravom gurnut u zapećak.
April 17,2025
... Show More
While Dickens is undoubtedly a master of weaving together an almost absurd number of distinct narratives into one central plot, he may have overreached a bit with Barnaby Rudge. Dickens is truly a magician when it comes to plot - seemingly against all odds, the many threads that run through each of Dickens' tomes typically coalesce seamlessly by the end of the novels. Barnaby Rudge, however, becomes somewhat lost after a five year time jump midway through the narrative and never entirely finds its way back.

Certain characters who are compelling in the introductory chapters - the endearingly guileless and steadfast Joe Willet, the charming and capricious Dolly Varden, and the tiny, spite-filled Simon Tappertit (a simultaneously repulsive and hilarious figure who is almost as fascinatingly vile as Copperfield's slimy Uriah Heep) - essentially disappear for hundreds of pages. Other figures who I found far less intriguing, like the savage Hugh (who is portrayed as some sort of awful intermediary between beast and man) and the bloodthirsty hangman Dennis, dominate the second half of the narrative. And while I often love reading about unlikable characters, the indiscriminately violent and destructive group of miscreants that are the center of the bulk of the novel remain relatively one-note in spite of the tremendous amount of chapters that are devoted to their stories.

A number of the plots that are so engaging at the beginning of the novel, like many of its best characters, also get somewhat lost in the shuffle as the focus of the narrative turns to the Gordon Riots. The mysterious murders, the family secrets, and the forbidden romance that pull you into the novel and anchor the beginning chapters fade almost completely into the background by the middle of the book. To be fair, these dropped plots are revived and cursorily resolved by the end of the novel - most of the loose threads are haphazardly tied up - but not in a way that feels truly complete or satisfactory.

That being said, I still enjoyed the experience of reading Barnaby Rudge and would probably even read it again. It feels like the bridge between the anomalously sombre and concise (for Dickens, that is) A Tale of Two Cities and the rest of Dickens' sprawling, over-the-top, and often grotesquely comic oeuvre - which alone makes it a worthwhile read for any serious fan of Dickens.

As a final note, Barnaby Rudge is probably worth reading solely for Grip the talking raven, an eerily astute bird who goes around muttering ominous things like "I'm the devil!" and "No popery!" and simultaneously amusing and unsettling his enthralled audience. Honestly, I would gleefully devour an entire novel exclusively focused on Grip's exploits. The book may be called Barnaby Rudge, but as far as I'm concerned, Grip steals the show.
April 17,2025
... Show More
This book is different from other Charles Dickens books, as it is not set in the author's Victorian-era Britain. Like A Tale of Two Cities, it was written as a historic novel, weaving in real-life events. Whereas the latter revolved around the French revolution, this book is set in 1780 and involves the Gordon riots against the Catholic Church, something I'd never heard of previously.

The book opens with the arrival of three strangers at an inn, including a highwayman, before the cast of characters is introduced. Strangely, Barnaby Rudge himself hardly appears in the first half and I started wondering early on why the book had been named after him. Thankfully, he does eventually become central to the main plot.

I noticed that Barnaby was referred to as a "village idiot", and I wondered if this was a non very politically correct 19th century term for an autistic person. I found him very easy to sympathise with, and I enjoyed reading the chapters involving him and his talking raven.

The first half of the book was a bit hard to get into, and mostly involved character romances, although I did enjoy the literary style; for example, at times Dickens tells an entire episode more than once, from the point of view of different characters.

The sections of the book I enjoyed most were in the second half where just about every main character got involved in the riots. The vivid portrayal of events was very compelling, and the scene where Newgate prison gets attacked reminded me of the storming of the Bastille in A Tale of Two Cities. At times, the story felt very dark, especially when the subject matter involved executions by hanging, and it felt like there was unlikely to be a happy ending.

Overall, I was glad that I persevered with this book, because I enjoyed it a lot.
April 17,2025
... Show More
The more I think about this one the more I think that I really did love it.
April 17,2025
... Show More
This the story of a half-wit, Barnaby, and how he was tricked into joining the Gordon Riots in London. Barnaby's poor mother has a terrible secret and a dark past that haunts her. Other characters include gruff Mr. Willet, the village innkeeper, and his son, Joe, who is in love with the locksmith's daughter, Dolly. At the same time, delicate Miss Haredale is involved in a forbidden courtship with the son of her uncle's sworn enemy, and the star-crossed lovers ask Barnaby to pass messages and notes for them. The disgruntled apprentice, Simon Tappertit, and the unsavory stableboy, Hugh, are instrumental in inciting the London riots, along with a hangman named Dennis who conceals his true profession from his companions in the riots.

I hated this story so much. I could barely force myself to read to the end. Usually I LOVE Dickens, but this book has so many problems.

First of all, the riots themselves were first boring, then awful and disturbing. I got so bored with all the plotting and secrets from various bad guys throughout the first half of the book, and then I was disgusted with all the atrocities committed by the rioters in the second half. Ugh. Not enjoyable to read.

Secondly, the villains get all the "screen time." In a normal book, you'll usually see about 70-80% of the scenes that feature the heroes, and maybe 10% that feature just the villains, plotting and being dastardly on their own, and then another 10-20% are the heroes and villains interacting and fighting, etc... But this book is very heavily focused on just the villains. I would not be exaggerating to say that 90% of this book is just about the villains, their plotting, their secrets, their evil deeds, their interactions with other villains. With the result that the villains are all fully-defined characters, and the heroes are a bunch of faceless nobodies.

I did not like a single character in this entire book, because none of the heroes (men or women) are developed properly. They are introduced and described and then tossed aside into the background, then they emerge a couple of times just so you don't forget who they are; they do a brief scene and disappear again, and then they come around to do one heroic deed out of nowhere, and they ride off into the sunset. Who the hay are you, hero? What have you been doing in the background all this time?

Even the villains are poorly developed. They are described in detail, and we get to hear all their conversations and dialogue and intrigue, but they don't grow or change or have any development. There is no progress, no maturing. And for a character-driven reader like me, that is the death of the book.

I didn't like this book, because I had no one to cheer for. Did they die? I don't care, because I don't really know them. Did they get kidnapped? Whatevs. Did they get hanged for crimes during the riots? Don't really care.

I'm so glad this is over. I'm beginning to learn that the great masters of the written word follow the "when it was good, it was very very good; but when it was bad, it was horrid" rule of life.
I thought "Hard Times" was my least favorite Dickens novel, but this one takes the prize!
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.