...
Show More
I was in Paris in October 2018, for the first time in my life (late to the Paris party, I know), and I saw the amazing "Lady and the Unicorn" tapestries in the Cluny Museum on the last day of our visit. The museum was right across from our hotel, and we saved it for the last day (less walking for exhausted legs), not realizing what an incredible treat we had in store.
The tapestries are truly awe-inspiring. They fill a medium-sized, dimly-lit stone room, much as they would have in @1495 when they were finished. Sound is muted, the room is noticeably warmer than the rest of the museum (which is in the restored, 11th century St. Cluny church), and there is a comforting hint of wool in the air, all these centuries later. You understand why expensive and large wool tapestries were so sought-after in chilly, medieval castles and wealthy homes: they helped warm the rooms.
The tapestries themselves are alive, the warm reds, blue, gold, green are still so vibrant and alive that they draw you in, and for a long time you just stand and stare. The flowers ("millefleurs" in the book), the animals, the Ladies, they are truly enchanting. They do tell a mysterious, engaging and alluring story about a young woman and a unicorn. (The museum also has a "history of the unicorn" exhibit alongside the tapestries, which is also pretty fascinating. At the time the tapestries were made, people still believed they were real.)
Even as I write this, I have two large posters from the exhibition and a calendar near me in my office, some of a very few touristy items I purchased on the trip. I had so many questions when I left the Cluny museum that day: who was the Lady in the tapestries, who made them, who commissioned them, how long did it take to make them, what story are they telling?
Anyway, it's hard for any book to live up to the real tapestries, and that may be why I was a little disappointed with this book. Chevalier clearly did A LOT of research, the writing is pretty vivid, and her exploration of the time period, Paris and the weavers guild in Brussels is fascinating. In fact, the story of the weaver and his family was my favourite part of the book.
But I found the story of the main character, the Parisian artist who is commissioned to paint the original ideas for the tapestries, a little disappointing. He's a jerk, all he can think about is his next conquest, and I get that he's supposed to be like the unicorn ... but I guess I wanted more majesty, mystery, more nuances to his character and more story frankly. The book did seem a little short, considering the depth and potential of the delicious material (haha).
Also, the other main character, the "Lady" herself, left me thinking, "What a stupid, spoiled brat." So whether she was a realistic portrait of a possible subject or not, she was tough to like or admire in any way. You don't necessarily have to like the main character, but again I suppose I was hoping for someone slightly more worthy or majestic. The real tapestries made me hope for more, which is perhaps unfair. Maybe the Lady in the tapestries really was a spoiled brat (hey, someone commissioned truly amazing works of art of her, so the potential was definitely there) ...
Still, I did learn quite a bit, and Chevalier's research clearly lead her to some interesting conclusions which did answer some questions for me, like who most likely made the tapestries, where, how and why?
All to say, if you like historical fiction you may enjoy this whether you've seen the tapestries or not (but don't miss them if you're ever in Paris!).
The tapestries are truly awe-inspiring. They fill a medium-sized, dimly-lit stone room, much as they would have in @1495 when they were finished. Sound is muted, the room is noticeably warmer than the rest of the museum (which is in the restored, 11th century St. Cluny church), and there is a comforting hint of wool in the air, all these centuries later. You understand why expensive and large wool tapestries were so sought-after in chilly, medieval castles and wealthy homes: they helped warm the rooms.
The tapestries themselves are alive, the warm reds, blue, gold, green are still so vibrant and alive that they draw you in, and for a long time you just stand and stare. The flowers ("millefleurs" in the book), the animals, the Ladies, they are truly enchanting. They do tell a mysterious, engaging and alluring story about a young woman and a unicorn. (The museum also has a "history of the unicorn" exhibit alongside the tapestries, which is also pretty fascinating. At the time the tapestries were made, people still believed they were real.)
Even as I write this, I have two large posters from the exhibition and a calendar near me in my office, some of a very few touristy items I purchased on the trip. I had so many questions when I left the Cluny museum that day: who was the Lady in the tapestries, who made them, who commissioned them, how long did it take to make them, what story are they telling?
Anyway, it's hard for any book to live up to the real tapestries, and that may be why I was a little disappointed with this book. Chevalier clearly did A LOT of research, the writing is pretty vivid, and her exploration of the time period, Paris and the weavers guild in Brussels is fascinating. In fact, the story of the weaver and his family was my favourite part of the book.
But I found the story of the main character, the Parisian artist who is commissioned to paint the original ideas for the tapestries, a little disappointing. He's a jerk, all he can think about is his next conquest, and I get that he's supposed to be like the unicorn ... but I guess I wanted more majesty, mystery, more nuances to his character and more story frankly. The book did seem a little short, considering the depth and potential of the delicious material (haha).
Also, the other main character, the "Lady" herself, left me thinking, "What a stupid, spoiled brat." So whether she was a realistic portrait of a possible subject or not, she was tough to like or admire in any way. You don't necessarily have to like the main character, but again I suppose I was hoping for someone slightly more worthy or majestic. The real tapestries made me hope for more, which is perhaps unfair. Maybe the Lady in the tapestries really was a spoiled brat (hey, someone commissioned truly amazing works of art of her, so the potential was definitely there) ...
Still, I did learn quite a bit, and Chevalier's research clearly lead her to some interesting conclusions which did answer some questions for me, like who most likely made the tapestries, where, how and why?
All to say, if you like historical fiction you may enjoy this whether you've seen the tapestries or not (but don't miss them if you're ever in Paris!).