...
Show More
TL:DR - it's well worth your time
It's easy to pick faults in a history book (i read the 1965 edition) that was last updated over 50 years ago. It would be easy to take the author to task that the brevity of topics covered leaves out important detail and context. These are both true however what I found fascinating about this book was
a) It was originally published in 1922 and to read an accomplished author look at history a hundred years ago was rare
b) H.G Wells is not known, to me at least, for writing non-fiction, but he does a very good job. Section lengths, topic choices, and links all flow well and feel right
c) the notable absence of the modern affliction of hyperbole and emotive language. I was particularly pleased not to see a single instance of 'literally' or 'unprecedented'
I bought this book over ten years ago but I am very glad I have finally read it. I have learnt so much along the way and had to re-think what I thought about other points in history
It's easy to pick faults in a history book (i read the 1965 edition) that was last updated over 50 years ago. It would be easy to take the author to task that the brevity of topics covered leaves out important detail and context. These are both true however what I found fascinating about this book was
a) It was originally published in 1922 and to read an accomplished author look at history a hundred years ago was rare
b) H.G Wells is not known, to me at least, for writing non-fiction, but he does a very good job. Section lengths, topic choices, and links all flow well and feel right
c) the notable absence of the modern affliction of hyperbole and emotive language. I was particularly pleased not to see a single instance of 'literally' or 'unprecedented'
I bought this book over ten years ago but I am very glad I have finally read it. I have learnt so much along the way and had to re-think what I thought about other points in history