...
Show More
For its time, Wells' history of the world (a somewhat ludicrous endeavor) avoids some of the prejudices that plague similar works--the book includes a significant section on prehistory, acknowledges some of the atrocities of imperial rule, and speaks highly of the accomplishments of non-European peoples. It is still highly problematic, not least for its utter non-treatment of women (who appear in three instances: as the property of neolithic men, and in brief references to Queen Elizabeth and Queen Victoria). Wells' world history promotes the idea that the world, led predominantly by European men, is evolving toward a single, unified organization, to be ruled by some sort of scientist-emperor. In my opinion, this is a mildly interesting work for Wells scholars, but not worth reading otherwise.