...
Show More
When I read a Raymond Chandler novel, I expect to find lines such as:
"I was as empty of life as a scarecrow's pockets."
or "He was a very small man, not much more than five foot three and would hardly weigh as much as a butcher's thumb."
Then, I find, "I got down there about nine, under a high hard October moon that lost itself in the top layers of a beach fog", and I realize what a fine and true writer the man was.
While I was reading The Big Sleep, I thought of a similarity Raymond Chandler had with the gypsy Flamenco guitarist, Manitas de Plata. Flamenco purists criticized Manitas de Plata for not adhering to the strictures of traditional flamenco. The problem with that line of thought is that Manitas de Plata didn't give much of a damn about rules. He was interested in expressing the fire in his soul and, especially in his early recordings, he did just that.
One of the criticisms of The Big Sleep is that there's an unexplained/unsolved murder. When director Howard Hawks was filming the The Big Sleep , he supposedly asked Chandler, who killed the chauffer? Chandler replied that he didn't know, and the implication was that he didn't care. Raymond Chandler didn't write mysteries. By the end of most mysteries all of the loose ends have to be neatly tied up. Chandler wrote detective/crime novels and there may be loose ends, just as in real life where not all crimes are solved. Chandler was interested in people and atmosphere. Any questions about the solutions of mysteries were a secondary concern for him.
I last read The Big Sleep when I was in my early 20's - longer ago than I care to think about. I liked the book very much then and It hasn't lost any of its magic over the years. I enjoyed this reading even more, possibly because I'm a better reader than I was then. At least I hope that I am.
"I was as empty of life as a scarecrow's pockets."
or "He was a very small man, not much more than five foot three and would hardly weigh as much as a butcher's thumb."
Then, I find, "I got down there about nine, under a high hard October moon that lost itself in the top layers of a beach fog", and I realize what a fine and true writer the man was.
While I was reading The Big Sleep, I thought of a similarity Raymond Chandler had with the gypsy Flamenco guitarist, Manitas de Plata. Flamenco purists criticized Manitas de Plata for not adhering to the strictures of traditional flamenco. The problem with that line of thought is that Manitas de Plata didn't give much of a damn about rules. He was interested in expressing the fire in his soul and, especially in his early recordings, he did just that.
One of the criticisms of The Big Sleep is that there's an unexplained/unsolved murder. When director Howard Hawks was filming the The Big Sleep , he supposedly asked Chandler, who killed the chauffer? Chandler replied that he didn't know, and the implication was that he didn't care. Raymond Chandler didn't write mysteries. By the end of most mysteries all of the loose ends have to be neatly tied up. Chandler wrote detective/crime novels and there may be loose ends, just as in real life where not all crimes are solved. Chandler was interested in people and atmosphere. Any questions about the solutions of mysteries were a secondary concern for him.
I last read The Big Sleep when I was in my early 20's - longer ago than I care to think about. I liked the book very much then and It hasn't lost any of its magic over the years. I enjoyed this reading even more, possibly because I'm a better reader than I was then. At least I hope that I am.