I first read this book 30 years ago. At that time, I was completely immersed in its world. Now, I find myself wondering how it would hold up over time. As it turns out, it has aged rather well. There are a few elements that now seem a bit simplistic, perhaps something I didn't notice as much during my initial reading. However, in terms of storytelling, it remains a good epic fantasy yarn.
One thing that really stood out to me this time around is that the author was clearly a D&D player. A significant portion of this first book reads like a classic D&D adventure, complete with a dungeon crawl. Towards the end, the characters have grown up a couple of years, and there is a slight shift in the storytelling style. What began as simplistic starts to mature into a more complex nature. This reminds me somewhat of the transition that occurs in the Harry Potter books.
The first time I read the complete book, 'Magician', of which this is only the first half. This book ends with one of the main hero's AWOL for several years, so it's a bit like only reading 'The Fellowship of the Ring' and not the entire trilogy. Anyone who only reads this book and doesn't continue with 'Magician :Master' is truly doing themselves a disservice and only getting half of the story. The only reason I can think of for splitting this book into two is greed on the publisher's part. Nevertheless, I am eager to continue on with the second part of the story to see how the adventure unfolds.